Last visit was: 08 Aug 2026, 14:48 It is currently 08 Aug 2026, 14:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
805+ (Hard)|   Graphs|         
User avatar
FrozenDragon
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2023
Last visit: 08 Aug 2026
Posts: 409
Own Kudos:
571
 [16]
Given Kudos: 497
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Posts: 409
Kudos: 571
 [16]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
FrozenDragon
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2023
Last visit: 08 Aug 2026
Posts: 409
Own Kudos:
571
 [1]
Given Kudos: 497
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Posts: 409
Kudos: 571
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sydneyxinning
Joined: 10 Jun 2020
Last visit: 08 Aug 2026
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Posts: 6
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
FrozenDragon
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2023
Last visit: 08 Aug 2026
Posts: 409
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 497
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Posts: 409
Kudos: 571
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sydneyxinning
FrozenDragon

Sorry, where do you get these "the blue bars in the graph show that these five percentages are 98% for 1989, 99% for 1990, 106% for 1991, 105% for 1992, and 108% for 1993."?
Hey there, blue bar shows the percentage difference here; so if blue bar indicate 1% difference, it means that --- now original value is 99% instead of 100%. I hope this helps.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 07 Aug 2026
Posts: 6,134
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 714
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,134
Kudos: 33,787
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi sydneyxinning,

Good question. Those five percentages come straight from the blue bars, but with one translation step that the official explanation skipped over.

Read the height of each blue (city home) bar first. On the graph they are:

- 1989: -2
- 1990: -1
- 1991: +6
- 1992: +5
- 1993: +8

Those are percent changes - how much the price went up or down that year, not the price itself.

Turning a change into a multiplier

To compound prices, you need each year's ending price as a percent of its starting price. That is just 100% plus the change:

- -2% change - 100% - 2% = 98%
- -1% change - 100% - 1% = 99%
- +6% change - 100% + 6% = 106%
- +5% change - 100% + 5% = 105%
- +8% change - 100% + 8% = 108%

That's where 98%, 99%, 106%, 105%, 108% come from - each is "the whole price (100%) after the bar's change is applied." Written as decimals, they become 0.98, 0.99, 1.06, 1.05, 1.08, which is what you multiply together.

Quick rehearsal with easy numbers: if a price rises +10% in a year, it ends at 110% of where it started, i.e. a multiplier of 1.10. If it falls -10%, it ends at 90%, i.e. 0.90. Same rule for every bar: start from 100%, add the bar's percent change.

So the graph never gives you the multipliers directly - you build each one by adding the bar's percent change to 100%.

Answer: increased by a larger percentage

sydneyxinning
FrozenDragon

Sorry, where do you get these "the blue bars in the graph show that these five percentages are 98% for 1989, 99% for 1990, 106% for 1991, 105% for 1992, and 108% for 1993."?
User avatar
VenkataSai
Joined: 21 Jul 2025
Last visit: 08 Aug 2026
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V80 DI78
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V80 DI78
Posts: 41
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FrozenDragon

The second question is asking about the change of prices for the period 1989 ~ 1993. which means if the price of house was 100 in 1989 what is its price difference from that of in 1993. So I think the first 0.98 that you multiplied should not be considered because that 2% reduction is from 1988 to 89 and the second question doesn't ask about 1988.
FrozenDragon
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

The graph only shows annual percent changes in average prices of city homes and of country homes. It doesn’t show whether country homes cost more or less than city homes on average in any year. But it does show that in each of the years 1989, 1990, and 1991, the average prices of country homes increased by a larger percentage than the average prices of city homes.

To find the overall compounded percent increase in average prices for city homes in the period 1989 through 1993, first find the average price at the end of each year as a percentage of the average price at the beginning of that year. The blue bars in the graph show that these five percentages are 98% for 1989, 99% for 1990, 106% for 1991, 105% for 1992, and 108% for 1993. Next, multiply these five percentages as decimal amounts and round to the nearest 1 percent: 0.98 × 0.99 × 1.06 × 1.05 × 1.08 ≈ 1.17 = 117%. This means that rounded to the nearest 1 percent, the overall percent increase in average prices of city homes in the period 1989 through 1993 was 17%.

The correct answers are “increased by a larger percentage” in the first drop-down menu and 17 in the second drop-down menu.
User avatar
FrozenDragon
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2023
Last visit: 08 Aug 2026
Posts: 409
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 497
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q83 V81 DI78
Posts: 409
Kudos: 571
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VenkataSai
FrozenDragon

The second question is asking about the change of prices for the period 1989 ~ 1993. which means if the price of house was 100 in 1989 what is its price difference from that of in 1993. So I think the first 0.98 that you multiplied should not be considered because that 2% reduction is from 1988 to 89 and the second question doesn't ask about 1988.

Hey there , you are treating the 1989 bar as a change that happened before the period, whereas it actually represents the change during 1989. Therefore, the period 1989 through 1993 includes all five annual changes (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1993), so the 1989 −2% must be included in the compounding.
Moderators:
Math Expert
112619 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts