It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 10:28

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the United States, vacationers account for more than half

Author Message
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

In the United States, vacationers account for more than half [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2005, 19:44
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called â€œpure aquariumsâ€

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2005, 20:08
B it is. It is hard to imagine that people will go on a vacation to a metropilitan city!!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2005, 21:51
rahul, can you explain this one more in depthly? thanks!

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1701

Kudos [?]: 471 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2005, 01:31
I think It is C

A is out because the paragraph talks about visitiors not the locals.

B is out of scope zoo and â€œpure aquariums" both can be in metropolitan city or country side.

D. is making an analogy by argument, which is a fallacy

E. it is also out of scope, because the size hasn't been an issue.

only C remains and explains the difference.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 471 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2005, 07:35
B for me. If only few cities have pure aquariums, the proportion of people from other cities visitting these aquariums will be greater than the proportion of people visitting zoos if zoos are in almost every city.

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2005, 13:22

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5207

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2005, 02:52
Going to a pure aquarium is more of a novelty attraction for travelers, because of their rarity. On the other hand, zoos are a dime a dozen available in most large cities.

Agree with (B)

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1701

Kudos [?]: 471 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2005, 15:13
What is the OA here?
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 471 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2006, 04:55
OA is B

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

14 Jun 2006, 04:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by