Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 17:09 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 17:09 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
30 Jun 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
47% (01:42) correct
53%
(01:52)
wrong
based on 339
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Incumbent candidate for governor: As the people of our great state know, my administration has created unprecedented economic prosperity and job growth. Just look at the unemployment rate, which has reached its lowest point in nearly twenty years!
Opposing candidate for governor: That’s preposterous. You overlook the fact that the unemployment rate is just as much a function of the number of people in the labor market as much as it is of the number of people employed. Your greatest contribution to the economy has been a series of retirement parties and moves to other states!
The opposing candidate’s reply to the incumbent proceeds by:
(A) Supplying a statistic that undermines the incumbent’s conclusion.
(B) Suggesting that the incumbent’s statistic is factually inaccurate.
(C) Offering a statistic that sheds additional light on the statistic supplied by the incumbent.
(D) Claiming that the incumbent used a statistic irrelevant to his conclusion.
(E) Pointing out that the incumbent cited a statistic that does not necessarily support his conclusion.
Opposing candidate for governor: That’s preposterous. You overlook the fact that the unemployment rate is just as much a function of the number of people in the labor market as much as it is of the number of people employed. Your greatest contribution to the economy has been a series of retirement parties and moves to other states!
The opposing candidate’s reply to the incumbent proceeds by:
(A) Supplying a statistic that undermines the incumbent’s conclusion.
(B) Suggesting that the incumbent’s statistic is factually inaccurate.
(C) Offering a statistic that sheds additional light on the statistic supplied by the incumbent.
(D) Claiming that the incumbent used a statistic irrelevant to his conclusion.
(E) Pointing out that the incumbent cited a statistic that does not necessarily support his conclusion.
01 Jul 2026, 01:20
Kudos
Bookmarks
Key Trap:
Don't confuse "irrelevant" with "insufficient." The unemployment rate is certainly relevant to the economy, but by itself it does not establish that the administration created economic prosperity and job growth. The opposing candidate attacks the link between the evidence and the conclusion, not the accuracy or relevance of the evidence.
A. Incorrect The opposing candidate does not introduce a new statistic. Instead, the reply explains why the incumbent's unemployment statistic can be misleading.
B. Incorrect The opposing candidate never claims the unemployment rate is incorrect. The statistic is accepted as accurate; only its interpretation is challenged.
C. Incorrect No additional statistic is provided. The reply offers an alternative explanation for the reported unemployment rate, not another numerical measure.
D. Incorrect The unemployment rate is relevant to economic performance. The opposing candidate argues that it is insufficient evidence, not irrelevant evidence.
E. Correct The opposing candidate argues that a low unemployment rate does not necessarily prove economic prosperity or job growth. The rate could also fall because fewer people remain in the labor force (e.g., retirements or people moving away), so the statistic does not necessarily support the incumbent's conclusion.
Don't confuse "irrelevant" with "insufficient." The unemployment rate is certainly relevant to the economy, but by itself it does not establish that the administration created economic prosperity and job growth. The opposing candidate attacks the link between the evidence and the conclusion, not the accuracy or relevance of the evidence.
A. Incorrect The opposing candidate does not introduce a new statistic. Instead, the reply explains why the incumbent's unemployment statistic can be misleading.
B. Incorrect The opposing candidate never claims the unemployment rate is incorrect. The statistic is accepted as accurate; only its interpretation is challenged.
C. Incorrect No additional statistic is provided. The reply offers an alternative explanation for the reported unemployment rate, not another numerical measure.
D. Incorrect The unemployment rate is relevant to economic performance. The opposing candidate argues that it is insufficient evidence, not irrelevant evidence.
E. Correct The opposing candidate argues that a low unemployment rate does not necessarily prove economic prosperity or job growth. The rate could also fall because fewer people remain in the labor force (e.g., retirements or people moving away), so the statistic does not necessarily support the incumbent's conclusion.
01 Jul 2026, 04:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
Answer E
The opponent does not deny the unemployment statistic. Instead, they argue that a low unemployment rate can result from fewer people being in the labor force instead of new jobs being created. So E exactly describes the response. The unemployment rate alone doesn't prove that the administration caused economic prosperity or job growth.
The opponent does not deny the unemployment statistic. Instead, they argue that a low unemployment rate can result from fewer people being in the labor force instead of new jobs being created. So E exactly describes the response. The unemployment rate alone doesn't prove that the administration caused economic prosperity or job growth.
02 Jul 2026, 21:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Premise - Low unemployment during his term
Conclusion - economic prosperity / job growth -> Low unemployment
To weaken this gap we need to prove that low unemployment could be because of other factors. So citing a real statistic does not necessarily support his conclusion.
Premise - Low unemployment during his term
Conclusion - economic prosperity / job growth -> Low unemployment
To weaken this gap we need to prove that low unemployment could be because of other factors. So citing a real statistic does not necessarily support his conclusion.
