Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 8

Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 20 Sep 2013, 00:39
Question Stats:
54% (01:13) correct 46% (01:03) wrong based on 153 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Is ad > bc ? (1) a/b > c/d (2) b/d >0
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by josemarioamaya on 19 Sep 2013, 19:32.
Last edited by Bunuel on 20 Sep 2013, 00:39, edited 1 time in total.
RENAMED THE TOPIC.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47983

Re: Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2013, 00:43



Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Posts: 376

Re: Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2018, 10:39
So this is a very interesting DS question!! Statement 2 is easier to evaluate. All we can infer from this statement is either both b & d are positive or negative. Clearly insuff Statement 1 is difficult to evaluate. Considering many scenarios could be time consuming. All we need to come up with two scenerios which lead to both a "yes" and a "no". So if b & d are having same sign then the answer is "yes" but if they have apposite sign then the answer is "no" to the question Is ad > bc ? If we combine Statement 1 & 2 we get a definite yes hence the correct answer is C.
_________________
"Please hit +1 Kudos if you like this post"
_________________ Manish
"Only I can change my life. No one can do it for me"



SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1783

Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2018, 14:29
CAMANISHPARMAR wrote: So this is a very interesting DS question!! Statement 1 is difficult to evaluate. Considering many scenarios could be time consuming. All we need to come up with two scenerios which lead to both a "yes" and a "no". So if b & d are having same sign then the answer is "yes" but if they have apposite sign then the answer is "no" to the question Is ad > bc ?
Hi CAMANISHPARMARSometimes pluggingin values is time consuming but we can easily fix numbers and play with others, for example in statement 1 \(\frac{a}{b} > \frac{c}{d}\) Let a=0, b=1, this will make LHS =0.......So choose any small numbers c= 1 & d=2.......0 > 1.......Answer is Yes Let a=0, b=1, this will make LHS =0.......So reverse numbers above c= 2 & d=1.......0 > 2.......Answer is No Insufficient Sometimes we tricked to find nice numbers and spend long time to make it fit. I hope it helps yo maybe in other questions.



Manager
Joined: 22 Jan 2014
Posts: 172
WE: Project Management (Computer Hardware)

Re: Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2018, 08:14
Bunuel wrote: Is ad > bc ?
(1) a/b > c/d. If b and d have the same sign, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad > bc but if they have the opposite signs, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad < bc. Not sufficient.
(2) b/d >0. b and d have the same sign but no info about a and c. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that b and d have the same sign, then from (1) we have the firs case: ad > bc. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel Can you explain where am i going wrong, i am getting E. Is ad>bc? 1) a/b > c/d if (a,b,c,d) = (2,1,1,1) > ans is yes if (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4) > ans is no insuff. 2) b/d > 0 insuff. (1) + (2) if (a,b,c,d) = (2,1,1,1) > ans is yes if (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4) > ans is no insuff.
_________________
Illegitimi non carborundum.



SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1783

Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2018, 11:56
thefibonacci wrote: Bunuel wrote: Is ad > bc ?
(1) a/b > c/d. If b and d have the same sign, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad > bc but if they have the opposite signs, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad < bc. Not sufficient.
(2) b/d >0. b and d have the same sign but no info about a and c. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that b and d have the same sign, then from (1) we have the firs case: ad > bc. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel Can you explain where am i going wrong, i am getting E. Is ad>bc? 1) a/b > c/d if (a,b,c,d) = (2,1,1,1) > ans is yes if (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4) > ans is noinsuff. 2) b/d > 0 insuff. (1) + (2) if (a,b,c,d) = (2,1,1,1) > ans is yes if (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4) > ans is no insuff. Hi, I'm happy to help. When b =2 & d=4 , then the highlighted past above does not satisfy the condition in statement 1 because 1/2 < 1/4.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47983

Re: Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2018, 21:04
thefibonacci wrote: Bunuel wrote: Is ad > bc ?
(1) a/b > c/d. If b and d have the same sign, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad > bc but if they have the opposite signs, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad < bc. Not sufficient.
(2) b/d >0. b and d have the same sign but no info about a and c. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that b and d have the same sign, then from (1) we have the firs case: ad > bc. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hi Bunuel Can you explain where am i going wrong, i am getting E. Is ad>bc? 1) a/b > c/d if (a,b,c,d) = (2,1,1,1) > ans is yes if (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4) > ans is no insuff. 2) b/d > 0 insuff. (1) + (2) if (a,b,c,d) = (2,1,1,1) > ans is yes if (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4) > ans is no insuff. If (a,b,c,d) = (1,2,1,4), then (a/b = 1/2) < (c/d = 1/4), so this set violates (1).
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2018
Posts: 5

Re: Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2018, 22:39
Bunuel wrote: Is ad > bc ?
(1) a/b > c/d. If b and d have the same sign, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad > bc but if they have the opposite signs, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad < bc. Not sufficient.
(2) b/d >0. b and d have the same sign but no info about a and c. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that b and d have the same sign, then from (1) we have the firs case: ad > bc. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hi Buenel, Why cant A be sufficient for this question: please find my explanation below and rectify me if I am going wrong any where: a/b>c/d; a/bc/d>0; (adbc)/bd>0; ad/bdbc/bd>0; ad/bd>bc/bd since,denominator in both the cases are same ,we can say that the numerators decides everything and hence A alone is sufficient. Regards, Parth Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47983

Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2018, 23:16
parthkar wrote: Bunuel wrote: Is ad > bc ?
(1) a/b > c/d. If b and d have the same sign, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad > bc but if they have the opposite signs, then when crossmultiplying we'll get ad < bc. Not sufficient.
(2) b/d >0. b and d have the same sign but no info about a and c. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that b and d have the same sign, then from (1) we have the firs case: ad > bc. Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Hope it's clear. Hi Buenel, Why cant A be sufficient for this question: please find my explanation below and rectify me if I am going wrong any where: a/b>c/d; a/bc/d>0; (adbc)/bd>0; ad/bdbc/bd>0; ad/bd>bc/bd since,denominator in both the cases are same ,we can say that the numerators decides everything and hence A alone is sufficient. Regards, Parth Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile appConsider the following: \(\frac{2}{(2)} > \frac{3}{(2)}\). The denominators are the same but is 2 > 3? No. The same in \(\frac{ad}{bd}>\frac{bc}{bd}\). ad would be greater than bc if and only bd is positive. In this case we could reduce the inequality by it and get ad > bc. But if bd is negative, then by reducing by it, since it's negative, we should flip the sign and we;d get ad < bc. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 580

Re: Is ad > bc ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jul 2018, 13:40
parthkar wrote: please find my explanation below and rectify me if I am going wrong any where:
a/b>c/d; a/bc/d>0; (adbc)/bd>0; ad/bdbc/bd>0; ad/bd>bc/bd
since,denominator in both the cases are same ,we can say that the numerators decides everything and hence A alone is sufficient.
The last statement you made (in red) is where you went wrong. All of your math is correct, but you can't make that assumption. A good guideline is to think through the math you're doing, rather than making assumptions about how the math will work out. (That's how you avoid careless mistakes.) ad/bd > bc/bd If you want to 'ignore' the denominators, what you're actually doing is multiplying both sides of the inequality by bd. However, you can't do that, because you don't know (without using statement 2) whether bd is positive or negative. So, you don't know whether or not to flip the inequality. You wouldn't know whether it would come out to ad > bc, or ad < bc! Since you don't know, the statement you used is insufficient.
_________________




Re: Is ad > bc ? &nbs
[#permalink]
30 Jul 2018, 13:40






