Last visit was: 12 May 2026, 05:26 It is currently 12 May 2026, 05:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
paeagain
Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Last visit: 27 Jan 2009
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17
Kudos: 254
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
Posts: 1,226
Kudos: 967
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
duuuma
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Last visit: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
Schools:UCLA Anderson '12
GPA: 3.5
Posts: 83
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
Posts: 1,226
Kudos: 967
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The first time around I just used a few Kaplan books and didn't even really look at them very closely. I didn't read any of them straight through. It may not have been taking it blind, but maybe taking it legally blind.

Second time around, I used this forum, Powerscore CR BIble, MGMAT SC Guide, OG11 (all 3 books), GMATPrep 1 & 2. and a few other CAT's but I forget the names of them. I studied on my lunch breaks, and at night. Total time spent studying was about 200 hours or so from late April to late July. I put in about 25 hours a week. It was nuts, but it paid off.

duuuma
My friend was killing the GMATprep practices on math (high 40's-50) and felt the real test was much harder. She still scored a 44, so it might just be her perception or nervousness.

jallenmorris - that's a great score you improved to. I scored a 670 on my first attempt last year and am looking to break into the 700's also. I'm curious to know, what did you use to study the 2nd time around and what was your regiment?
avatar
shurashura
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Last visit: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 6
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I always thought it had to do with the idea that ppl tend to do better on the math than the verbal part, so for example, 5 q's wrong on math might get you a lower percentile than 5 q's wrong on the verbal.
User avatar
amitdgr
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Last visit: 21 May 2013
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 534
Kudos: 3,226
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shurashura
I always thought it had to do with the idea that ppl tend to do better on the math than the verbal part, so for example, 5 q's wrong on math might get you a lower percentile than 5 q's wrong on the verbal.

i think it is the other way round for percentiles ... each verbal question seems to carry more weight than a quant question ....
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
amitdgr
shurashura
I always thought it had to do with the idea that ppl tend to do better on the math than the verbal part, so for example, 5 q's wrong on math might get you a lower percentile than 5 q's wrong on the verbal.

i think it is the other way round for percentiles ... each verbal question seems to carry more weight than a quant question ....

I've seen similar results GMATPrep. Of course the difficulty of the question and proximity of wrong answers to one another will skew the results, but here's the results of one GMATPrep:

Quant 47 (missed 10 -> 73.0% correct)
Verbal 34 (missed 12 -> 70.7% correct)

Based on this non-scientific analysis of one exam, I would submit that Verbal questions are weighted more heavily than Quant questions. However, many other factors may have contributed to these results.
avatar
maruti81
Joined: 24 May 2008
Last visit: 05 Feb 2009
Posts: 9
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yep looks like Verbal is comparatively heavily weighted than Quant. Also a lower raw verbal score puts you in a higher percentile as compared to the raw quant score.
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
Posts: 1,226
Kudos: 967
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think that it's because lots of people think the most important thing with b-school is being able to crunch the numbers, but it does no one any good to crunch the numbers if that person cannot communicate the results to anyone else in an effective manner. Verbal skills will always outweigh raw techincal ability in math or science. You can save the economy or cure cancer with technical science and math, but you can get elected president with great verbal skills. (Obama)

maruti81
Yep looks like Verbal is comparatively heavily weighted than Quant. Also a lower raw verbal score puts you in a higher percentile as compared to the raw quant score.
User avatar
amitdgr
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Last visit: 21 May 2013
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 534
Kudos: 3,226
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jallenmorris
but you can get elected president with great verbal skills. (Obama)

:lol:

He is definitely one of the best orators in the trade ....
User avatar
jallenmorris
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Last visit: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1,226
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
Posts: 1,226
Kudos: 967
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree that he's an amazing orator, but in my opinion, the substance is lacking. (Sorry I'm hi-jackign the thread)

amitdgr
jallenmorris
but you can get elected president with great verbal skills. (Obama)

:lol:

He is definitely one of the best orators in the trade ....
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jallenmorris
I agree that he's an amazing orator, but in my opinion, the substance is lacking. (Sorry I'm hi-jackign the thread)

amitdgr
jallenmorris
but you can get elected president with great verbal skills. (Obama)

:lol:

He is definitely one of the best orators in the trade ....

While we're at it: I agree.

If you haven't seen this yet, Arnold's speech is hillarious. At 1:40 Arnold makes fun of Obama's physique.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWZuhGb6ux4
Moderators:
200 posts
General GMAT Forum Moderator
474 posts