Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I don't want to get into such complex solution my only query is ...

S 1 : tells 5n/18 is an integer - 5 is prime, hence it must be clear that "n" will be divisible by 18 , in that case n/18 will be an integer .

then why some folks are not mentioning A wrong ??

Is i am missing any logic plz explain ?

You are missing that we are NOT told that n is an integer. So, 5n/18=integer, does not necessarily mean that n is a multiple of 18, if for example n=18/5, then it's not so.

From F.S 1, we know that \(\frac{5n}{18}\) is an integer. For\(\frac{n}{18} = 1\), we have a YES. Again, for \(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{1}{5}\) , we have a NO.Insufficient.

From F.S 2, we know that\(\frac{3n}{18}\) is an integer. For \(\frac{n}{18} = 1\), we have a YES,but for \(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{1}{3}\) , we have a NO.Insufficient.

Taking both together, we know that from F.S 1, either\(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{k}{5}\) or \(\frac{n}{18} = p\) , where k,p are integers and k and 5 are co-primes.

But, for \(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{k}{5}\), \(\frac{3*n}{18} = \frac{3*k}{5}\) and it will not be an integer. Thus, \(\frac{n}{18} = p\) can the only be form possible.

C.

I am absolutely stumped on understanding the above explanations. My thought process was to break down the denominator into its primes --> 3^2 and 2, then identify whether N has those same characteristics, leading my to choose A.

I know this is a vague response, but any chance you could help me understand how A is wrong and how the 2 combined MUST form an integer.

I don't want to get into such complex solution my only query is ...

S 1 : tells 5n/18 is an integer - 5 is prime, hence it must be clear that "n" will be divisible by 18 , in that case n/18 will be an integer .

then why some folks are not mentioning A wrong ??

Is i am missing any logic plz explain ?

You are missing that we are NOT told that n is an integer. So, 5n/18=integer, does not necessarily mean that n is a multiple of 18, if for example n=18/5, then it's not so.

Hope it's clear.

Than you very much for giving me an insight...i will take care this in future.
_________________

From F.S 1, we know that \(\frac{5n}{18}\) is an integer. For\(\frac{n}{18} = 1\), we have a YES. Again, for \(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{1}{5}\) , we have a NO.Insufficient.

From F.S 2, we know that\(\frac{3n}{18}\) is an integer. For \(\frac{n}{18} = 1\), we have a YES,but for \(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{1}{3}\) , we have a NO.Insufficient.

Taking both together, we know that from F.S 1, either\(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{k}{5}\) or \(\frac{n}{18} = p\) , where k,p are integers and k and 5 are co-primes.

But, for \(\frac{n}{18} = \frac{k}{5}\), \(\frac{3*n}{18} = \frac{3*k}{5}\) and it will not be an integer. Thus, \(\frac{n}{18} = p\) can the only be form possible.

C.

I am absolutely stumped on understanding the above explanations. My thought process was to break down the denominator into its primes --> 3^2 and 2, then identify whether N has those same characteristics, leading my to choose A.

I know this is a vague response, but any chance you could help me understand how A is wrong and how the 2 combined MUST form an integer.

If \(\frac{5n}{18}=0\), then \(n=0\) and \(\frac{n}{18}=0=integer\); If \(\frac{5n}{18}=1\), then \(n=\frac{18}{5}\) and \(\frac{n}{18}=\frac{1}{5}\neq{integer}\).

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) 3n/18 is an integer --> \(\frac{3n}{18}=\frac{n}{6}=integer\) --> \(n=6*integer=integer\). So, this statement implies that n is a multiple of 6.

If \(n=0\), then \(\frac{n}{18}=0=integer\) If \(n=6\), then \(\frac{n}{18}=\frac{1}{3}\neq{integer}\).

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that n is an integer, then from (1) it follows that it must be a multiple of 18. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

If we were told in the stem that n is an integer, then the answer would be A.

This was my reasoning as well but I don't get how 'C' can be the answer. I mean for 5n to be divisible by 18 it must have the same prime factors as 18. In which case shouldn't 'n' have the same prime factors as 18 thereby making n/18 an integer?

mikki0000 wrote:

I've used just common sense here, since I'm not getting anywhere with traditional ways.

(A) St 1 is sufficient. Because, since 18 = 3*3*2, 5 and 18 have no factors in common.

Which means for 5n/18 to be an integer, n must be a multiple of 18! Hence sufficient.

(B) is not sufficient because 3 and 18 have common factors, so n may be a multiple of 18, the only thing certain here is that it will be a multiple of 6. Therefore not sufficient.

Since 5 and 3 are co primes to each other n will have to be a multiple of 18 for 5n/18 and 3n/18 to be an integer.

Answer is C

I can see how these statements alone are insufficient.

Just testing numbers gives that. For 5n/18 to be an integer 5n has to be a multiple of 18, but for instance if 5n equals 18 then n equals 3, something so that wont be divisible by 18. Same goes for the second statement.

But i cant find any clear explanation that i understand why these 2 taken together are sufficient. Can someone use examples please? thank you in advance.

Bunuel does an excellent job explaining it earlier in the thread, but I'll give it a shot (I find it helps my own understanding).

In statement 1, we are told that 5n/18 = Int. n = (18/5) * Integer. We do not know if this results in n being an int or not. Insufficient. In statement 2, we are told that 3n/18 = Int. n = 6 * integer. In this statement, we know that n is an integer (int * int = int). However, that doesn't mean that n/18 is an integer (question stem). This can be illustrated by picking n = 6 and n = 18; one yields 1/3 (not int), and one yields 1 (integer).

When we combine 1 + 2, it is sufficient: From statement 2, we know that n MUST BE an integer (recall n = 6 * int, which must yield an int). Now by looking at statement 1, we notice that 5n/18 = integer. If n is an integer, it MUST BE a multiple of 18, because 5 itself does not share any prime factors with 18. Therefore, the only way that 5n/18 can be an integer with n being an integer is for n to be a multiple of 18.

If the qustion says division result (n/18) is an integer (no fractional part) , shoul we consider decimal values also?

Hi SoumiyaGoutham,

Integers by definition are Non-Fractional and Non-Decimal type Numbers. So (5n/18) should be an Integer doesn't ascertain the value of n which theoretically can be a fraction of two integers (or Decimal value) as well e.g. for n= 18/5, (5n/18) will be an Integer

"An integer (from the Latin integer meaning "whole")[note 1] is a number that can be written without a fractional component. For example, 21, 4, 0, and −2048 are integers, while 9.75, 5½, and √2 are not.

The set of integers consists of zero (0), the natural numbers (1, 2, 3, …), also called whole numbers or counting numbers,[1] and their additive inverses (the negative integers, i.e. −1, −2, −3, …). This is often denoted by a boldface Z ("Z") or blackboard bold \mathbb{Z} (Unicode U+2124 ℤ) standing for the German word Zahlen ([ˈtsaːlən], "numbers").[2][3] ℤ is a subset of the sets of rational and real numbers and, like the natural numbers, is countably infinite.

The integers form the smallest group and the smallest ring containing the natural numbers. In algebraic number theory, the integers are sometimes called rational integers to distinguish them from the more general algebraic integers. In fact, the (rational) integers are the algebraic integers that are also rational numbers."

Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

From 1: 5n/18 = a (an integer) => n/18 = a/5 (we cannot be sure if this is an interger) From 2: 3n/18 = b (an integer) => n/18 = b/3 (we cannot be sure if this is an interger) Combining 1&2: 2*(statement 2) - (statement 1) => 6n/18 - 5n/18 = 18*2*b - 18*a => n/18 = 18(2b-a) {this we know for sure is an integer} Thus, Option C

Thanks for the solution, really simple. But I tried to make your solution more understandble.

Let n/18=p, (we don't know if p is integer), 1) 5p=a, a is integer, but p=a/5 not necessarily interger 2) 3p=b, b is integer, but p=b/3 not necessarily interger equation 2*2-equation 1: on the left: 2*3p-5p=p on the right: 2b-a so we have the equition p=2b-a, which is clearly integer.

Condition 1: n is a multiple of 18 like 36, e.g.: (5 x 36)/18 ==> n/18 = 36/18 ==> is an integer.

Condition 2: n is a fraction with the numerator a multiple of 18 and denominator 5 like 36/5, e.g.: (5x(36/5))/18 ==> n/18 = (36/5)/18 ==> not an integer.

Condition 3: n =0.

INSUFF.

St 2: 3n/18 is an integer. True only if

Condition 1: n is a multiple of 18 like 18, e.g.: (3 x 18)/18 ==> n/18 = 18/18 ==> is an integer.

Condition 2: n is a fraction with the numerator a multiple of 18 and denominator is 3 like 18/3, e.g.: (3 x (18/3))/18 ==> n/18 = (18/3)/18 ==> not an integer.

Condition 3: n = 0.

INSUFF.

Combined: Since Conditions 2 of statements 1 and 2 are mutually exclusive(denominator of n can't be 3 and 5 simultaneously), either condition 1 or condition 3 is true, in either case, n/18 is an integer.

If \(\frac{5n}{18}=0\), then \(n=0\) and \(\frac{n}{18}=0=integer\); If \(\frac{5n}{18}=1\), then \(n=\frac{18}{5}\) and \(\frac{n}{18}=\frac{1}{5}\neq{integer}\).

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) 3n/18 is an integer --> \(\frac{3n}{18}=\frac{n}{6}=integer\) --> \(n=6*integer=integer\). So, this statement implies that n is a multiple of 6.

If \(n=0\), then \(\frac{n}{18}=0=integer\) If \(n=6\), then \(\frac{n}{18}=\frac{1}{3}\neq{integer}\).

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that n is an integer, then from (1) it follows that it must be a multiple of 18. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

If we were told in the stem that n is an integer, then the answer would be A.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel,

Just to get more clarity, what would be your answer if the second statement is changed to- 7n/18 is an integer?

Actually i had a different approach to the answer:

Take n/18 as a constant R

Now, since 5R is an integer, the only way R is not an integer is when R itself is a simplified fraction with only 5 as denominator, which is a possibility. Similarly for 3R, a fraction with only 3 as denominator

Using both, i know it is not possible that both 5R and 3R are integers when R is not, because my above cases can only be true by having only one digit (5 or 3) as denominator. Thus, R has to be an integer itself.

5n/18 = K (K considered as some Integer). Therefore n = 18k/5. Hence if k = 1, then n = 18/5 i.e. 3.6. Hence n/18 is not an an integer. Hence insufficient. But if we consider k as 5, the n = 18 x 5/18 = 18. Then n/18 = 18/18 = 1.

3n/18 = K (K considered as some Integer). Therefore n = 6K. Therefore if K = 1 or 2, Then 6 x 1/18 or 6 x 2/18 is not an integer. Hence insufficient., But if we consider k as 3, then n = 6 x3 = 18 and hence n = 18/18 = 1.

Considering both the stamens we know that n = 18, 36, 54 etc Hence "C"

I think it can be explained in an even more straightforward fashion-- tell me if i'm wrong.

is n/18 an integer is equivalent to asking is x an integer.

1. 5x is an integer. For this to be case, x can either be an integer, or be equal to 1/5-- if it were to be a non integer. X can here take integer, or non integer characteristics. Not enough.

2. 3x is an integer. For this to be case, x can either be an integer, or be equal to 1/3-- if it were to be a non integer. X can here take integer, or non integer characteristics. Not enough.

1&2: The two given information would contradict another if x were to be a non integer. if X were to be 1/5, the 3x would not be an integer, and vice versa.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Statement 1: 5n is a multiple of 18 or n is a multiple of 3.6. Not sufficient Statement 2: 3n is a multiple of 18 or n is a multiple of 6. Not sufficient

Both 1 and 2. n is a multiple of both 3.6 and 6 i.e, n is a multiple of 18. Sufficient

First condition To 5n/18 an integer, n must be multiple of 18. Hence, n/18 is always integer and sufficient to espouse the conclusion.

Second condition To 3n/18 an integer, n must be multiple of 6. Hence, n/18 is not always integer and insufficient to espouse the conclusion. Therefore, I went with A. Where am I wrong?

First condition To 5n/18 an integer, n must be multiple of 18. Hence, n/18 is always integer and sufficient to espouse the conclusion.

Second condition To 3n/18 an integer, n must be multiple of 6. Hence, n/18 is not always integer and insufficient to espouse the conclusion. Therefore, I went with A. Where am I wrong?