Hi Jane. I realized after reading/solving the PR book that I wasn't being prepared as good as I needed in order to achieve the score I'm looking for. It helped a lot in understanding the way the GMAT works, but I find some of their ways to work only on intermediate problems. Also, I find it faster to solve a lot of problems by traditional techniques, ie, quant.
After I finished, I found out that this is somewhat a generalized opinion.
That's why I'm was curious to see if there was a step up from the OG.
But that's just my opinion, of course.
I'm about to start solving their cats, though, since I've read they are pretty accurate. Question, though. I have also some from the 2005 edition. Do you think those work too?
Have a good one.