Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 00:46 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 00:46

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Geometryx               
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618870 [8]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 1050
Own Kudos [?]: 1777 [8]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 202
Own Kudos [?]: 361 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 15 Aug 2017
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 597 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
GMAT 1: 780 Q49 V51
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectan [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Bunuel wrote:
Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectangular field G ?

(1) The area of F is greater than the area of G.
(2) The width of F is less than the width of G.


DS96502.01
Quantitative Review 2020 NEW QUESTION


In this case, individually, we are able to fairly quickly discern that just the area of F being greater (statement (1)) - or just the width of F being less (statement (2)) cannot be enough information, as we can both answer the question "yes" and "no" within those parameters. So, we'll want to think about whether both statements together are sufficient or neither is sufficient.

When we take the statements together, in order to have a larger area, the (length)*(width) will need to be larger.

So, if we know we have a smaller width - we can conceptually conclude that the length of rectangular field F will need to be greater than the length of rectangular field G

(smaller length)*(larger width) must be true in order to be > (larger length)*(smaller width)

Basically, the length must be larger to outweigh the smaller width and create a greater outcome for (length)*(width).

So, since the length of F must be greater in order for the statements combined to hold true - together, the statements are sufficient! (C)

Since the overlap of the two statements creates a situation such that the length must be larger, we are able to conclude sufficiency. David makes a great point above in that this would not be the case if we were told that the width of F was greater, this would not be enough information - even together - as we could still answer the question "yes" and answer it "no."

It is specifically because we have the must be true parameter around the length being greater that we are able to conclude sufficiency. We know the answer must be "yes."

Hope this helps! :)
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3726
Own Kudos [?]: 16833 [3]
Given Kudos: 165
Send PM
Re: Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectan [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply

Solution


Steps 1 & 2: Understand Question and Draw Inferences
In this question, we are given:
    • Two rectangular fields: F and G.

We need to determine:
    • Whether the length of rectangular field F is greater than rectangular field G or not.

Let us assume that
    • length of field F = Lf and width = Wf
    • Similarly, length of field G = Lg and width= Wg

So, to answer this question, we need the length of both the rectangular fields or a relation between them.

With this understanding, let us now analyse the individual statements.

Step 3: Analyse Statement 1
“The area of F is greater than the area of G.”
    • Area of field F = Lf × Wf
    • Area of field G = Lg × Wg

Area of field F > Area of field G
    • Hence, Lf × Wf > Lg × Wg

However, this does neither give us the value of Lf and Lg nor any relation between them.

Hence, statement 1 is not sufficient to answer the question.

Step 4: Analyse Statement 2
“The width of F is less than the width of G.”
    • Wf < Wg
    • From this statement, we cannot find the relation between Lf¬ and Lg.

Hence, statement 2 is not sufficient to answer the question.

Step 5: Combine Both Statements Together (If Needed)
From Statement 1:
    • Lf × Wf > Lg × Wg ---------(1)

From Statement 2:
    • Wf < Wg -----------(2)

If we multiply Lg in the above inequality, we get: Lg × Wf < Lg × Wg ---------(3)

From (1) and (3) inequality, we get:
    • Lf × Wf > Lg × Wg > Lg × Wf
    • Lf × Wf > Lg × Wf
      o Since Wf is positive, we can divide it on both the sides of the inequality and sign will not change.
         Thus, Lf > Lg

Hence, we can find the answer by combining both the statements together.

Thus, the correct answer choice is option C.

Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Posts: 972
Own Kudos [?]: 4927 [0]
Given Kudos: 690
Concentration: Accounting
Send PM
Re: Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectan [#permalink]
Top Contributor
Bunuel wrote:
Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectangular field G ?

(1) The area of F is greater than the area of G.
(2) The width of F is less than the width of G.



(1) Length can be greater or smaller, For example

Area of the rectangle = Length x Width

Area of F=12*10=120; Area of G=10*8=80, but

Area of F=12*10=120; Area of G=13*8=104

Yes or No; Insufficient.

(2) No information about length; Insufficient.

Considering Both:
Area of F=12*10=120; Area of G=10*8=80

Area of F=12*10=120; Area of G=15*8=120; Contradictory with the statements

So, Both statements together give a certain answer.

The answer is C.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32662
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectan [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is the length of rectangular field F greater than the length of rectan [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92901 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne