Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 16:21 It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 16:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,594
Own Kudos:
741,978
 [3]
Given Kudos: 98,202
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,594
Kudos: 741,978
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,768
Own Kudos:
1,841
 [2]
Given Kudos: 656
Posts: 1,768
Kudos: 1,841
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATWhizTeam
User avatar
GMATWhiz Representative
Joined: 07 May 2019
Last visit: 14 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,384
Own Kudos:
2,078
 [1]
Given Kudos: 68
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Posts: 3,384
Kudos: 2,078
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Feb 2023
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 305
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatophobia

Any suggestion to think of values in a particular manner so that when combining both the information, it doesn’t take much time to solve the question
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Products:
Posts: 3,150
Kudos: 9,025
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rickooreo
gmatophobia

Any suggestion to think of values in a particular manner so that when combining both the information, it doesn’t take much time to solve the question

Rickooreo - I know that you're not looking for this answer, so my apologies upfront if the reply disappoints and doesn't answer your question.

I avoid picking up numbers as much as possible and try to solve questions based on inequalities (or quant in general) purely based on reasoning (first because GMAT is a test of reasoning, and second because I am very bad in picking up numbers :lol: ). That being said, this is how I would solve this question.

Question

y - x < 0

y < x

Inference : : Does "y" lie to the left of "x" on a number line. At this point, I would probably even draw one on my sheet as I did while working on this question.

Statement 1

y > \(\sqrt{x}\)

The first thing that pops out of the page here is \(\sqrt{x}\). Hence, x has to be non negative, and we know that y > \(\sqrt{x}\), i.e. y lies to the right of \(\sqrt{x}\) on the number line.

Let's see which region(s) can x lie and on the basis of the position of x, how can we possibly infer the positions of \(\sqrt{x}\) and y.

Case 1 : 0< x <1

If x lies between 0 and 1, \(\sqrt{x}\) lies to the right of x.

We know that y lies to the right of \(\sqrt{x}\), hence the y is to the right of x. This is shown by the red arrow.

Case 2 : 0< x <1

If x lies beyond 1, \(\sqrt{x}\) lies to the left of x.

We know that y lies to the right of \(\sqrt{x}\). But there can be two positions now that y can have-

y can be between \(\sqrt{x}\) and x - in this case y is to the left of x

OR

y can lie to the right of x

These two positions are shown using blue arrow.

As we are getting two positions of y, we can eliminate A and D.

Statement 2

y - \(x^2\) < 0

y < \(x^2\)

Inference: y lies to the left of \(x^2\)

Just as in statement 1- the first thing that I observe is \(x^2\). \(x^2\) is non - negative, so I will first begin by plotting that. As I have already analyzed for positive values of x in statement 1 (and have determined that knowing x > 0, doesn't help), my focus will be on negative values of x. We will come to positive values of x if need be.

Case 1 : 0< \(x^2\) <1

If \(x^2\) is between 0 and 1, x is between -1 and 0.

We know that y lies to the left of \(x^2\), so y can be at any positions as shown by the red arrow.

So it can lie to the left of x or y can lie to the the right of x.

This is enough to reject the statement 2. However, one can also observe the same behavior when \(x^2\) > 1

So eliminate B.

Combined

When we combine the statements we still have the entire positive region of x. The region between 0 and 1 can be rejected as in that region statement 1 and statement 2 cannot together hold true.

When x > 1 -
  • \(\sqrt{x}\) lies to the left of x
  • \(x^2 \) lies to the right of x.

On the basis of the information presented in St.1 & in St2, we still can have two position of y as shown by the red arrows. In one position, x is to the right of y and in other position x is the left of y.

Hence the ambiguity remains and the answer is Option E

My final take- This may seem a lot (looking at length of the explanation) and one may doubt that if all the analysis can be done under 2 mins. My answer to that - Yes !

I took 1:18 seconds to solve the question (of course the typing took way too long :lol:). I am sure I would have taken way longer if I had to pick up numbers.

Hope this helps !
Attachments

Screenshot 2022-11-19 121731.png
Screenshot 2022-11-19 121731.png [ 97 KiB | Viewed 1595 times ]

User avatar
JoeAa
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 08 Apr 2024
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 43
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can I put it this way?

Statement 1
y > √x
square both side
y^2>x, meaning y can be +/-

Statement 2
y - x^2 < 0
y < x^2, meaning x can be +/-

so 1/2 alone is insufficent, and combining both since x & y can be both +/-, also insufficient?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,594
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,202
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,594
Kudos: 741,978
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JoeAa
can I put it this way?

Statement 1
y > √x
square both side
y^2>x, meaning y can be +/-

Statement 2
y - x^2 < 0
y < x^2, meaning x can be +/-

so 1/2 alone is insufficent, and combining both since x & y can be both +/-, also insufficient?

No, that's not correct. The statement y > √x implies that y is positive because it is greater than the square root of a number, and the square root is always nonnegative.
Moderator:
Math Expert
102594 posts