It is currently 20 Apr 2018, 19:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44588
Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2018, 04:48
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

68% (01:17) correct 32% (01:26) wrong based on 21 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 309
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.64
WE: Business Development (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2018, 06:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
Statement 1: (-3,1) or (1,-3) both satisfy statement 1 but in one case y>z, in other z>y.
NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: (-1,4) or (4,-1) both satisfy statement 2 but in one case y>z, in other z>y.
NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combibg statement 1 & 2, we get..
-y-2z>0 (statement 1)
z+2y>0 (statement 2)
Adding both inequalities, we get
y-z>0 or y>z. Hence SUFFICIENT.

Answer C

Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

SC: Confusable words
All you need for Quant, GMAT PS Question Directory,GMAT DS Question Directory
Error log/Key Concepts

Appreciate my post by giving kudos .

SVP
SVP
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1612
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2018, 12:20
Bunuel wrote:
Is y > z?

(1) -y > 2z
(2) z > -2y


(1) -y > 2z

Let y = 1 & z = -1..........-1 > -2............Answer is Yes

Let y = -1 & z = 0...........1 > 0..............Answer is NO

Insufficient

(2) z > -2y

We can make it: -2y < z

Let y = 1 & z = -1.............-2 < -1..............Answer is Yes

Let y = -1 & z = 10............2 < 10..............Answer is NO

Insufficient

Combining 1 & 2

-y > 2z

z > -2y
----------------Sum the two inequality as sign in same direction

z - y > 2z -2y

y > z.........we reached certain answer

Answer: C
Expert Post
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
User avatar
D
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 5255
GMAT 1: 800 Q59 V59
GPA: 3.82
Re: Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2018, 23:03
Bunuel wrote:
Is y > z?

(1) -y > 2z
(2) z > -2y


Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. For DS problems, the VA (Variable Approach) method is the quickest and easiest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember that equal numbers of variables and independent equations ensure a solution.

Since we have 2 variables (y and z) and 0 equations, C is most likely to be the answer. So, we should consider conditions 1) & 2) together first. After comparing the number of variables and the number of equations, we can save time by considering conditions 1) & 2) together first.

Conditions 1) & 2)

Since z > -2y and -y > 2z, we have z > -2y > 4z and z < 0.
And -2y < z < 0 and y > 0.
Thus y > z
Both conditions together are sufficient.

Since this question is an inequality question (one of the key question areas), CMT (Common Mistake Type) 4(A) of the VA (Variable Approach) method tells us that we should also check answers A and B.

Condition 1)
If y = 1 and z = -2, the answer is "yes".
If y = -2 and z = -1, the answer is "no".
Since we don't have a unique solution, condition 1) is not sufficient.

Condition 2)
If y = 2 and z = 1, the answer is "yes".
If y = 1 and z = 2, the answer is "no".
Since we don't have a unique solution, condition 1) is not sufficient.

Therefore, the answer is C.

Normally, in problems which require 2 equations, such as those in which the original conditions include 2 variables, or 3 variables and 1 equation, or 4 variables and 2 equations, each of conditions 1) and 2) provide an additional equation. In these problems, the two key possibilities are that C is the answer (with probability 70%), and E is the answer (with probability 25%). Thus, there is only a 5% chance that A, B or D is the answer. This occurs in common mistake types 3 and 4. Since C (both conditions together are sufficient) is the most likely answer, we save time by first checking whether conditions 1) and 2) are sufficient, when taken together. Obviously, there may be cases in which the answer is A, B, D or E, but if conditions 1) and 2) are NOT sufficient when taken together, the answer must be E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only $79 for 3 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"

Re: Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y   [#permalink] 11 Apr 2018, 23:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Is y > z? (1) -y > 2z (2) z > -2y

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.