stgantayetI believe there's a crucial perspective on the GMAT that was overlooked in the original write-up. I'm here to provide a more comprehensive understanding of how GMAT scores are evaluated.
Assess your GMAT score (690) by looking at the quantitative and verbal sections separately. Admissions committees use a bell curve or normal distribution to evaluate your performance on the Q & V compared to peers within your demographic. For instance, a Q49 score, which falls around the 75th percentile, is generally considered borderline elite for overrepresented demographic groups at top business schools.
Your quantitative score reflects your ability to handle the academically rigorous curriculum of 1year MBA/PGP programs. If your quant score is close to or exceeds this threshold, the admissions committee is likely to be confident in your ability in this area.
On the other hand, your verbal score signifies your capacity to engage in discussions within a diverse and global cohort. As an Indian applicant, you might typically perform better on the quant section, which aligns with the expectations of adcoms, as MBA/PGP programs tend to emphasize analytical and quantitative skills.
If your verbal score is the culprit, do your best to explain this is not a representative of your communication skills and that you can very well hold a conversation in a formal set up including the classroom discussions and pedagogy. Your interview performance will matter a lot.
Feel free to connect for further discussion.
Aanchal Sahni (INSEAD alum, ex MBA admissions interviewer)MBAGuideConsulting
LinkedIn |WEBSITE:
https://mbaguideconsulting.com/ | Message: +91 9971200927| email-
[email protected]