Hi SlowtoBoot,You've spotted the exact trap this question is built on, so let's zoom in on that one line:
"The culprit? Texting and internet chat rooms, of course."The key question is: is the author stating
their own belief here, or
repeating someone else's? Look at the sentences wrapped around it:
- Opening line: "It is the
same old tired argument trotted out once again."
- Closing line: "This kind of
conservative stand has accompanied every evolution in communication."
Those two lines tell us the author thinks the whole blame-the-technology story is stale and wrong. So "The culprit? Texting..., of course" is
sarcasm - the author is mockingly voicing the government's view, not endorsing it. That little "of course" is the tip-off; it's an eye-roll, not agreement.
This is the classic split between what an author
reports and what an author
endorses. The government blames technology; the author is making fun of that blame.
Once you see that, choice
C actually lines up
with the author: it says even if teens' skills did drop, technology may not be the cause - which is exactly the author's point. So the author would
agree with C, making it a wrong pick for a "least likely to agree" question.
E is the real answer because it calls the change "degrading" - the very conservative position the author is ridiculing.
Quick way to feel the tone flip:
- "The culprit? Texting,
of course." - dripping with sarcasm; author disagrees.
- "The culprit is
clearly and truly texting." - now the author owns the claim; your reading would be right.
Same words about texting - but the surrounding attitude decides whether the author means it. Here, everything around it says they don't.
Answer: ESlowtoBoot
C. Even if one were to assume that the cognitive skills of teenagers have deteriorated in recent times, the causes could well be elsewhere than the adoption of new technology.
Doesn't this mean that something else than technology is responsible for deterioration of cognitive skills of teenagers.
In text: "... The culprit? Texting and internet chat rooms, of course." which indicates new tech as culprit,
Doesn't hat mean the author would least agree with "C"