It is currently 22 Feb 2018, 16:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Jane: Professor Harper s ideas for modifying the design of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 75
Jane: Professor Harper s ideas for modifying the design of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2010, 23:27
4
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

36% (01:20) correct 64% (01:32) wrong based on 242 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Jane: Professor Harper’s ideas for modifying the design of guitars are of no
value because there is no general agreement among musicians as to what a
guitar should sound like and, consequently, no widely accepted basis for
evaluating the merits of a guitar’s sound.
Mark: What’s more, Harper’s ideas have had enough time to be adopted if
they really resulted in superior sound. It took only ten years for the Torres
design for guitars to be almost universally adopted because of the
improvement it makes in tonal quality. Which one of the following most
accurately describes the relationship between Jane’s argument and Mark’s
argument?

A Mark’s argument shows how a weakness in Jane’s argument can be
overcome.

B Mark’s argument has a premise in common with Jane’s argument.

C Mark and Jane use similar techniques to argue for different conclusions.

D Mark’s argument restates Jane’s argument in other terms.

E Mark’s argument and Jane’s argument are based on conflicting suppositions.

ANY TAKERS?
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2009
Posts: 12

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2010, 23:56
1
KUDOS
I ll say E....

Even though they are coming to similar conclusions. Jane believes there is no accepted quality of tone whereas the other says there is a accepted quality but prof harper is not the one
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 114
Location: Mumbai

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2010, 19:35
I would go with B. Since both of them are reaching to a same conclusion that Prof Harper is not successful in modifying guitar design.
Retired Moderator
Status: Darden Class of 2013
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 1834
Schools: University of Virginia

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2010, 22:45
I'm leaning towards (E).

Jane's argument is describing how there's no universally-adopted sound for guitar.
Mark's argument somehow pointed out that it took less than 10 years for Torres to finally discovery a (more-or-less) universally-adopted sound.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 269

### Show Tags

26 Jan 2010, 16:52
Why isn't D the correct answer. Mark's argument starts with "What More" which seems like a continuation of Jane's argument. Mark goes on to argue that there is no consensus on the sound adoption and even after 10 years the design is still not adopted.

I think D is the correct answer
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 60

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 02:04
1
KUDOS
serbiano wrote:
Jane: Professor Harper’s ideas for modifying the design of guitars are of no
value because there is no general agreement among musicians as to what a
guitar should sound like and, consequently, no widely accepted basis for
evaluating the merits of a guitar’s sound.
Mark: What’s more, Harper’s ideas have had enough time to be adopted if
they really resulted in superior sound. It took only ten years for the Torres
design for guitars to be almost universally adopted because of the
improvement it makes in tonal quality. Which one of the following most
accurately describes the relationship between Jane’s argument and Mark’s
argument?

A Mark’s argument shows how a weakness in Jane’s argument can be
overcome.

B Mark’s argument has a premise in common with Jane’s argument.

C Mark and Jane use similar techniques to argue for different conclusions.

D Mark’s argument restates Jane’s argument in other terms.

E Mark’s argument and Jane’s argument are based on conflicting suppositions.

ANY TAKERS?

My ans is E
Jane: harper's has no value since no widely accepted basis for evaluating the merits of a guitar’s sound.
Mark: it can have value, if time and superior sound.
So Jane and Mark base their conclusions on different suppositions.
_________________

I am not born to be a GENIUS nor a GMATTER. If you are struggling, we are in the same boat. Fight to the last!!

Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 51
Schools: Cambridge

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 02:21
One more E.
_________________

No Execuse..

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 183

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 05:00
A Mark’s argument shows how a weakness in Jane’s argument can be
overcome.
Marks arg doesnot show any weakness in Janes since they are based on different suppositions
B Mark’s argument has a premise in common with Jane’s argument.
none common..totalkly different premises
C Mark and Jane use similar techniques to argue for different conclusions.
conslcusion remians same
D Mark’s argument restates Jane’s argument in other terms.
conclusion is same,argument isnt
E Mark’s argument and Jane’s argument are based on conflicting suppositions.
CORRECT
Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 140

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 09:28
IMO D ..
Jane argues that Harper's Ideas are not of a value because there is no consensus among the musicians on the modifications advised by Harper

Now.. Continuing this stand Mark adds "Harper’s ideas have had enough time to be adopted if they really resulted in superior sound."
Marks says that the Harper's Ideas would have been adopted if they were Good , means the Ideas are not so Good.. He adds on and gives example of Torres that his Ideas met consensus among musicians in ONLY 10 YEARS as they improved Quality.
"It took only ten years for the Torres design for guitars to be almost universally adopted because of the improvement it makes in tonal quality."

In a way Mark and Jane says the same thing that HARPER'S IDEAS WERE NOT GOOD TO IMPROVE SOUND QUALITY OF GUITAR

Thus,i think answer should be D "Mark’s argument restates Jane’s argument in other terms."not E... PLEASE PROVIDE OA & explanation if any
Retired Moderator
Status: Darden Class of 2013
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 1834
Schools: University of Virginia

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 10:45
I think this question/thread has been opened for too long. Can we get the OA, and OE if possible?

Thanks.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 323

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 20:31
One more vote for D
Manager
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 75

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2010, 23:46
15
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
OA is E.

This is one of the greatest Method of Reasoning questions of all time. First
take a close look at the statements made by Jane and Mark. In the majority
of GMAT questions with two speakers—one identifiably male and the other
identifiably female—the male makes a mistake or an error of reasoning and
the female uses sound reasoning. This does not occur in every problem, but
it occurs enough to be more than random. Why? The thinking goes that in
order for GMAC to protect themselves against accusations that they are
biased against women, they create problems where the male is clearly the
one using faulty reasoning. Jane’s position: Jane concludes that Professor
Harper’s ideas are valueless because there is no way to evaluate a guitar
sound and determine what constitutes a better-sounding guitar. Mark’s
position: Mark also agrees that Professor Harper’s ideas are valueless, but
Mark’s reasoning is that if Harper’s ideas really worked, then they would have
been adopted by now. In making this analysis, Mark reveals that he believes
there is a way to determine that one guitar sounds better than another. Like
all GMAT questions, you must lock down the exact nature of the premises
and conclusions! Mark’s initial comment of “What’s more” leads most people
to believe he is in complete agreement with Jane. Yes, he agrees with her
conclusion, but his reason for doing so is completely contrary to Jane’s
reason. Mark actually misinterprets Jane’s claim, and this is why he says
“What’s more,” as if he is adding an additional piece of information that
supports her position. He is not; the premise that he uses contradicts Jane’s
premises. If you simply accept “What’s more” to mean that he is in complete
agreement with Jane, you will most certainly miss the question, and have no
idea you have done so. The problem becomes even more challenging
Mark does not address a weakness in Jane’s argument or show how one
could be overcome. Do not mistake the use of “What’s more” to automatically
This is an answer chosen by many people, and it has Shell game aspects.
Mark’s argument does not have a premise in common with Jane’s argument;
rather, Mark’s argument has the conclusion in common with Jane’s
argument. Before you select this answer, use the Fact Test and ask yourself,
“Which premise do the two arguments have in common?” You won’t be able
to find one, and that would instantly disprove the answer. Answer choice (C):
This is a very clever Reverse Answer choice. The answer states: “Mark and
Jane use similar techniques to argue for different conclusions.” In fact, the
following happens in the stimulus: “Mark and Jane use different techniques to
argue for similar conclusions.” If you had any doubt that the makers of the
GMAT put the same amount of work into the wrong answers as the correct
choice (D): An argument is the sum of the premises and conclusion. Although
Mark restates Jane’s conclusion, he does not restate her premises.
Therefore, he does not restate her argument and this answer is incorrect.
Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer. As discussed in the argument
analysis, Jane believes that there is no way to evaluate the merit of a guitar’s
sounds. On the opposite side, Mark’s response indicates he believes that
there is a way to evaluate the merit of a guitar’s sound (“because of the
improvement it makes in tonal quality”) and thus the two have conflicting
positions.
This is another great example of a separator question: one that
scorers in a certain range will get and scorers in a lower range will not get.
This is also a dangerous question because many people think they have
chosen the correct answer when in fact they have missed it. The lesson here
is that you must be an active, prepared reader. Do not allow yourself to be
lured by Mark’s comment of “What’s more” into believing that he
automatically is in agreement with Jane. The test makers use that phrase to
see if you will read closely enough to discern his real argument or if you will
simply gloss over his comments on the basis of how they are introduced. The
GMAT always makes you pay if you gloss over any section of a stimulus.
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 4

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2010, 00:09
Option E.

Guitar Sounds.

One supposes there is nothing like widely accepted.

The other gives an example of a case where it was widely accepted
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 304
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2010, 00:44
serbiano

Great question. Where is it from?
VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1437
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2010, 00:22
Serbiano - Thanks a lot. Your post is informative in the truest sense of the word...thank you so much!
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 154

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2010, 02:57
Bravo
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 140

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2010, 10:14
Yeah right.. this time i got it while reading again.. Your explanation is great .
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 89

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2010, 10:47
E
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amar
http://amarnaik.wordpress.com

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 413

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2010, 20:20
I chose E ..thankfully ...great post serbiano
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 140

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2010, 22:28
E
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Re: CR: Prof. Harper   [#permalink] 11 Jul 2010, 22:28

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 37 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by