Hi ananya88888888888,I can see where this is coming from. You're looking at affalcon12's post, where the
5-minute gap (
12 -
7) shows up, and thinking: if I also grab the
8 mph gap (
48 -
40), can't I just multiply them to get the distance? It's a natural instinct, but it slips on one thing.
Why the shortcut breaks: distance = speed x time only works for one
real trip - a rate you actually travel at, for a time you actually travel. But here:
-
8 mph is not a speed Jeff ever drove. It's just the
gap between two averages.
-
5 minutes is not a trip time. It's the
gap between two travel times.
Multiplying a speed-gap by a time-gap gives a number with no meaning. (Try it:
8 mph x
5/
60 hr approximately
0.67 miles - nowhere near any answer.)
What actually makes the 5-minute idea valid: the distance is the
same both days. That's why you can write
d/40 - d/48 = 5/60
The two terms are the two real travel times for the
same d, and their difference is
5 minutes. Notice the
8 does appear when you combine the fractions - d/40 - d/48 = 8d/1920 - but it lives
inside the structure; it's not something you multiply by
5 directly.
Quick check to feel itTake an easy case: distance
60 miles, speeds
20 and
30 mph.
- Time at
20 =
3 hr, time at
30 =
2 hr - time gap =
1 hr- Speed gap =
10 mphSpeed gap x time gap =
10 x
1 =
10 - but the real distance is
60. The shortcut clearly fails.
Therefore, stick with d/40 - d/48 = 5/60, which gives
d = 20.
Answer: Aananya88888888888
Here what if we do that in 8 miles per hour speed, time is 5 mins (diff between times) so we get total distance and total timw from there