━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━STEP 1: IDENTIFY THE TWO VIEWPOINTS━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━► Political Scientists' View:The party uses traditional media instead of digital → This doesn't serve the party's interests
First Boldface = Their CONCLUSION► Journalist's View:"However..." → Party is strong in rural areas, base is
50+, opponents are digital-heavy
Second Boldface = Journalist's CONCLUSION━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━STEP 2: MAP THE ARGUMENT STRUCTURE━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━BACKGROUND:"For several years, the centrist party has been exhorting its wealthy donors..."
"The party has not invested much into reaching out to voters through digital media..."
FIRST BOLDFACE:"many political scientists argue that the centrist party's actions do not serve even its own political interests"
→ Political Scientists' CONCLUSIONSHIFT SIGNAL:"However..."
→ Journalist is about to COUNTER
JOURNALIST'S EVIDENCE:• Party strongest in rural areas (low digital connectivity)
• Party's base is
50+ voters (don't use digital media)
• Party's opponents ARE the digital-heavy demographics
SECOND BOLDFACE:"Therefore, the political scientists' conclusion is likely incorrect"
→ Journalist's CONCLUSION━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━STEP 3: DETERMINE THE ROLES━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━First Boldface:• Introduced with "argue that" = conclusion indicator
• This is what the journalist
OPPOSES• Role:
Political Scientists' CONCLUSIONSecond Boldface:• Introduced with "Therefore" = conclusion indicator
• This is what the journalist is arguing FOR
• Role:
Journalist's CONCLUSION━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━STEP 4: ELIMINATE WRONG ANSWERS━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━(A) First supports journalist's conclusion; second questions it
✗ Wrong: First is what journalist OPPOSES, not supports
(B) First is journalist's conclusion; second supports it
✗ Wrong: First is political scientists' conclusion, not journalist's
(C) First supports political scientists' conclusion; second IS their conclusion
✗ Wrong: First IS their conclusion (not support), second is JOURNALIST'S conclusion
(D) Each supports journalist's conclusion
✗ Wrong: First is what journalist OPPOSES
(E) First is political scientists' conclusion; second is journalist's conclusion
✓ Correct!━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━KEY TAKEAWAY FOR BOLDFACE QUESTIONS━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Always identify:• How many viewpoints exist (usually
2)
• Whose conclusion is whose
• Signal words: "argue that" / "However" / "Therefore"
In opposing-viewpoint passages:• One boldface = the
OPPOSING conclusion
• Other boldface = the
AUTHOR'S conclusion
Answer: E