I've come to the conclusion that Kaplan's tests do not score quant accurately (have read several threads about this as well). Despite not finishing on quant for one CAT and guessing for the last several questions on another, I still scored 50 and 49 (respectively). Yes, I got a higher score when I did not finish a section. Does anyone have an idea of how I should adjust my quant score?
For quant on Princeton Review I was getting 49, 43, 41, 47, and 51, in that order. I got 44 on Manhattan's free CAT all the way back when I had just started studying, so I think I am high 40s. I just don't think my performance on Kaplan merits the relatively high scores I've been getting.
Also, is this table still accurate?
gmat-scores-83890.htmlThe combined scores on my last few CATs for Princeton and Kaplan should equate to about 740-750, but I was scoring 700-730, so 30-50 below per test. The Kaplan scores being low makes sense if they know their scaled scores are flawed, but I don't know what's up with Princeton. I haven't seen any recent Princeton threads, so I don't know what the consensus is these days.
Any advice much appreciated.