alexn49
Hey guys,
could you help me with that CR ?
Thx
So the following is what I get from the stimulus:
Premises -
Degree jobs pay more than non degree
No. of Kravonians enrolled has been growing steadily
Conclusion - Therefore, there will be significantly more degree holders in the job market.
When we weaken the argument, we focus on the conclusion. That is what we have to weaken. So think why there may not be significantly more degree holders in the years to come.
Options (A), (C), (D) and (E) are irrelevant to our conclusion.
(D) could be a reason why more people are enrolling in college. But it doesn't say why there may not be significantly more degree holders in the job market.
(B) says that people are taking longer and longer to get their degrees. Hence, there may not many degree holders in the job market in the years to come because people may still be enrolled.
(I do not like the word 'eventually' in the question because that implies after whatever years it takes, but out of these 5 options, I have to look for best suitable answer so I will go with (B))