GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 19:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Librarian: Some argue that the preservation grant we received should

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1159

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2018, 08:23
3
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:55) correct 28% (01:54) wrong based on 130 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Librarian: Some argue that the preservation grant we received should be used to restore our original copy of our town’s charter, since if the charter is not restored, it will soon deteriorate beyond repair. But this document, although sentimentally important, has no scholarly value. Copies are readily available. Since we are a research library and not a museum, the money would be better spent preserving documents that have significant scholarly value.

The claim that the town’s charter, if not restored, will soon deteriorate beyond repair plays which one of the following roles in the librarian’s argument?

(A) It is a claim that the librarian’s argument attempts to show to be false.
(B) It is the conclusion of the argument that the librarian’s argument rejects.
(C) It is a premise in an argument whose conclusion is rejected by the librarian’s argument.
(D) It is a premise used to support the librarian’s main conclusion.
(E) It is a claim whose truth is required by the librarian’s argument.

_________________
Non progredi est regredi
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 1140
Re: Librarian: Some argue that the preservation grant we received should  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2018, 08:43
1
Akela wrote:
Librarian: Some argue that the preservation grant we received should be used to restore our original copy of our town’s charter, since if the charter is not restored, it will soon deteriorate beyond repair. But this document, although sentimentally important, has no scholarly value. Copies are readily available. Since we are a research library and not a museum, the money would be better spent preserving documents that have significant scholarly value.

The claim that the town’s charter, if not restored, will soon deteriorate beyond repair plays which one of the following roles in the librarian’s argument?

(A) It is a claim that the librarian’s argument attempts to show to be false.
(B) It is the conclusion of the argument that the librarian’s argument rejects.
(C) It is a premise in an argument whose conclusion is rejected by the librarian’s argument.
(D) It is a premise used to support the librarian’s main conclusion.
(E) It is a claim whose truth is required by the librarian’s argument.

Let's break down our passage.
1. preservation grant should be used to restore charter
2. (because) if charter not restored --> it will deteriorate beyond repair
3. charter has sentimental but not scholarly value + many copies avaiable
4. we are research library --> spend money on scholarly documents

We're asked what role (2) above plays in the argument. Looking at out breakdown, it is clear that (1) is a claim, (2) is a reason underlying the claim and (3),(4) form a counterargument against (1).
We'll look for an answer reflecting this breakdown, a Logical approach.

This is exactly what (C) tells us and it is therefore our answer.
_________________
Re: Librarian: Some argue that the preservation grant we received should   [#permalink] 18 Oct 2018, 08:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by