Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
16 Jul 2005, 01:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
I'm wondering whether GMATclub has a list of errors in sample questions for the most commong study guides. I've browsed the lists and it seems that most people focus on a few books - Cracking GMAT, Official Guide, Kaplan... Well I've just started "Cracking the GMAT" from Princeton Review and I've come across a few sample questions that seem to be wrong. But I don't know where to look up if the answers given in the book are mistaken, or are misprints. It seems like this would be a good addition to the GMATclub site if it doesn't already exist here.
So, here is what I propose - two new threads (sticky?). One of threads would be a place for people to propose errors and misprints in the most common study guides. People would then comment on the proposed errors and the proposed error would be either accepted as a misprint, or the proper solution would be explained to the poster, telling him why it is not an error and explaining how to solve the problem. Then, if it was agreed to be an error or misprint in the book, the misprint/error would be moved to the second thread. This would provide a very organized way to catalog the errors in the most common study guides. Let me know what you think of this idea.
So, here is what I propose - two new threads (sticky?). One of threads would be a place for people to propose errors and misprints in the most common study guides. People would then comment on the proposed errors and the proposed error would be either accepted as a misprint, or the proper solution would be explained to the poster, telling him why it is not an error and explaining how to solve the problem. Then, if it was agreed to be an error or misprint in the book, the misprint/error would be moved to the second thread. This would provide a very organized way to catalog the errors in the most common study guides. Let me know what you think of this idea.
Moderator:
