Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 12:07 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 12:07
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
37,015
 [5]
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,015
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sachbash14
Joined: 12 Jan 2022
Last visit: 28 May 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 5
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,754
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,856
Posts: 4,754
Kudos: 37,015
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


B

(I) is supported by Lauck's opinion expressed in the fifth sentence and is correct. If the works were "misunderstood," then they were "misread." (II) is also correct. This choice is supported by the third sentence, where it's said that Van Doren, one of the critics responsible for the discussions that led to the formation of the American canon of literature, called these works "the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States." Since a canon of literature is a list of the most important or influential books, and since Van Doren's comment is cited in reference to the creation of the American canon, it is inferred that "Van Doren and other Eastern critics" thought the works of the "revolt" school were the most important literature from the Midwestern United States. (III) is not supported by the text. While Foote does criticize Lauck's omission of a crucial definition, she also considers Lauck's book "a triumph of research" and so likely supports his assessment of these works. Her criticism is directed toward an issue that is peripheral to the literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.
User avatar
shubhim20
Joined: 03 Feb 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 113
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 113
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
didn't get how II is correct?
carcass
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


B

(I) is supported by Lauck's opinion expressed in the fifth sentence and is correct. If the works were "misunderstood," then they were "misread." (II) is also correct. This choice is supported by the third sentence, where it's said that Van Doren, one of the critics responsible for the discussions that led to the formation of the American canon of literature, called these works "the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States." Since a canon of literature is a list of the most important or influential books, and since Van Doren's comment is cited in reference to the creation of the American canon, it is inferred that "Van Doren and other Eastern critics" thought the works of the "revolt" school were the most important literature from the Midwestern United States. (III) is not supported by the text. While Foote does criticize Lauck's omission of a crucial definition, she also considers Lauck's book "a triumph of research" and so likely supports his assessment of these works. Her criticism is directed toward an issue that is peripheral to the literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.
User avatar
PSKhore
Joined: 28 Apr 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 175
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
Products:
Posts: 175
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
carcass
Van Doren described the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States as that which could be characterized as a "revolt from the village." He celebrated authors who portrayed local life as stifling rather than satisfying and considered them artistic innovators and political visionaries.

From this we infer the II

sachbash14
Wondering why this is (B) and not (A)?
I see why I. applies, but I am struggling with II.
TYIA
But how is interesting equivalent to important?
I rejected II because of this reasoning
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17302 posts
189 posts