Thanks for the responses. I presume that I concluded the GMAT was more heavily weighted toward the quantitative because it seems almost 2/3 of study materials, discussion boards, etc have been on this topic, not verbal. However, this may be because, like me, most feel least prepared to excel at the quantitative portion. It is good to know that (a) I'm not the only one feeling this way (b) if I don't do as well as I would like on the quant, I have a bit of "make up" room on the verbal section. With that said... what is the best diagnostic test to take (that gives you the best benchmark, but is also "reasonable" in difficulty and length- as I presume a diagnostic that is too hard may scare away or demoralize some and one that is too easy may not give a proper diagnosis of one's skill. Regarding study schedules- fortunately/unfortunately, I do have a demanding full time job, and family which both demand a significant amount of time. With that said, I have scheduled 20hrs per week to devote to GMAT. Last night, I decided the following daily schedule would be best for me:
M-F, AM- 1hr study guides
M-F, PM- 1hr practice questions & review
Sat, AM- 2hr practice test
Sat, PM- 2hr practice test review
Sun, AM- 2hr
error log review
Sun, Mid- 2hr as needed review by topic
Sun, PM- 2hr practice questions by topic to make sure I am ready to move on.
This equates to 20hrs per week, 1 full length practice test a week, 1-topic per week (meaning 1
MGMAT book), and 1
error log review per week. This seems organized, and inclusionary of all major preparation review elements.
Again, thanks for the comments. I think I was a bit hysterical in my previous post. Definitely felt overwhelmed. But, a bit of organization, and good sleep, and reading through some positive posts seems to have cured me.