November 14, 2018 November 14, 2018 08:00 PM MST 09:00 PM MST Join the webinar and learn timemanagement tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today! Nov. 14th at 7 PM PST November 15, 2018 November 15, 2018 10:00 PM MST 11:00 PM MST EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299)
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50543

Question Stats:
57% (00:46) correct 43% (01:10) wrong based on 123 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50543

Re M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Sep 2014, 23:35
Official Solution: Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. Let's pick numbers: if the sides of \(ABC\) are 1, 1 and \(\sqrt{2}\) (a half of a square with sides equal to 1), the area equals \(0.5\) and t perimeter is \(2+\sqrt{2}\). The perimeter is much greater than the area of a triangle with these values. However if the sides of \(ABC\) are 10, 10, and \(10\sqrt{2}\); then the perimeter is \(20+10\sqrt{2}\) and the area is 50. The perimeter is much smaller than the area. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. All it tells us is that both triangles are similar or proportionate to each other, but nothing about their size. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Combining the two statements, we still cannot determine whether the triangles have small values of their sides that yield greater perimeters or large values that yield greater area measurements. Answer: E
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 145
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT Date: 01142015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2015, 11:10
Hi Bunnel , In stmt 1 where does triangle DEF come in to play , the solution only mentions ABC ? Could you elaborate stmt 1 .
Thanks and Regards , Shelrod007



Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2015
Posts: 3

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2015, 00:11
Hello Bunuel,
I am confused on statement1, can you please explain it more clearly?
Thanks



Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 15
GPA: 3.35
WE: Marketing (Education)

Hi, Bunuel. I answered correctly but I just have a question. Is the solution below a right application of the properties of a triangle? or was I just lucky to arrive at the correct answer?
My approach:
Statement 1: Area ABC < Perimeter of DEF To maximize the area of ABC, let's assume that it's an equilateral triangle with side x. The area becomes [x^2(√3)]/4
To maximize the area given a perimeter, let's assume that the triangle DEF is also an equilateral triangle with side, y. The area DEF becomes [y^2(√3)]/4
Since we don't know the length of the sides, x and y, the statement is insufficient.
Statement 2: Angles of ABC = Angles of DEF This only tells us that the triangles are similar.
Combining both: Since we already assumed that both are equilateral triangles, and therefore similar, statement 2 doesn't add any additional information. We still don't know the length of the sides and therefore, the both statements taken together are insufficient.



Current Student
Joined: 14 May 2014
Posts: 43
GPA: 3.11

Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statement (1) by itself is insufficient. Let's pick numbers: if the sides of \(ABC\) are 1, 1 and \(\sqrt{2}\) (a half of a square with sides equal to 1), the area equals \(0.5\) and t perimeter is \(2+\sqrt{2}\). The perimeter is much greater than the area of a triangle with these values. However if the sides of \(ABC\) are 10, 10, and \(10\sqrt{2}\); then the perimeter is \(20+10\sqrt{2}\) and the area is 50. The perimeter is much smaller than the area. Statement (2) by itself is insufficient. All it tells us is that both triangles are similar or proportionate to each other, but nothing about their size. Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. Combining the two statements, we still cannot determine whether the triangles have small values of their sides that yield greater perimeters or large values that yield greater area measurements.
Answer: E Hi Bunuel , I am little confused about explanation for stmnt 1. In your explanation, you are talking about ABC only but the given stmnt talks about comparison of triangles. for stmnt 1 to be insufficient, it shd lead to 2 contradictory results. can you pls elaborate a little.



Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2014
Posts: 11
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Other, Strategy
GPA: 3.95
WE: Consulting (Education)

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Aug 2015, 09:22
Hi guys,
Since we know that a triangle can have an area > perimeter or perimeter > area, we can infer two scenarios: while, in the first, the area of DEF is bigger than perimeter of DEF, so area of DEF is bigger than area ABC, in the second, the perimeter of DEF is bigger than area of DEF, so we can have area of DEF > area of ABC and area of ABC > area of DEF. Therefore, statement 1 is insufficient.



Manager
Joined: 28 Oct 2015
Posts: 52

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jun 2016, 02:24
Can someone please explain the solution since the official solution is a bit unclear as it only talks about the ABC triangle and does not mention DEF triangle. I am clear with the statement 2 but not sure about statement 1.



Manager
Joined: 24 Apr 2014
Posts: 101
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38 GMAT 2: 750 Q48 V45
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2016, 23:52
from statement 1) assume perimeter of DEF is 30 ( so that we can find the max area of DEF for equilateral triangle) As per statement area of ABC < perimeter of DEF area ABC < 30 From DEF , perimeter = 30 > each side is 10 (equilateral) area DEF = 100 * (1.73/4) = 25*1.73 = value is greater than 30. now we know area of ABC < Max area of DEF . can we find the Max area of ABC ..... NO we dont know the perimeter or any side . Not sufficient . Statement 2) only tells about 2 similar angels . we can't prove the triangles are congruent . Not sufficient . E
_________________
way to victory .....



VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 1000

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Sep 2016, 03:38
goGMAT2015 wrote: Hello Bunuel,
I am confused on statement1, can you please explain it more clearly?
Thanks For statement (1) plz consider attached fig. case 1 : both areas equal case 2: DEF<ABC............not suff.... (2) angles in attached fig. is 90deg. combined also insufff.. Ans E
>> !!!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.



Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2016
Posts: 7
Concentration: International Business, Sustainability

Re M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2016, 22:05
I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. i could'nt find the solution clear.please provide a better one



Intern
Joined: 03 Feb 2016
Posts: 9

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jan 2017, 06:51
Consider for ABC, A1 is the area and P1 is the perimeter.
Similarly consider A2 and P2 for DEF.
Now statement 1 gives A1< P2
And asks us if A1> A2?
Is is not hard to imagine A1< P2< A2 and therefor A1< A2 (if area of one triangle is smaller than the perimeter of another, we can easily imagine the latter to be infinitely big).
But can we imagine A2< A1< P2 (or A2< A1)?
The official solutions says that for triangles with small sides, perimeter> area. So we take smaller triangles to see if we can find an example.
Try with smaller sets (1, 1, √2/ 2, 2, 2√2 and 1, 1, √2 / 0.5, 0.5, 0.5√2) and you will find that statement goes both ways. Hence, insufficient.



Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2017
Posts: 21

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Feb 2017, 14:05
I have a question how can we compare a perimeter with an area?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50543

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Feb 2017, 21:24



Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 81

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 May 2017, 03:23
This question can be solved easily by using only 2 cases : Fact 1  Area of ABC < Perimeter of DEF Consider both ABC and DEF as right angled triangles with 3, 4, 5 combination Area of ABC (3,4,5) = 1/2 * 3 * 4 = 6 Perimeter of DEF (3,4,5) = 3+4+5 = 12 So Is Ar. of ABC > Ar. of DEF ? [Is 6 > 6?] ........ NO Consider both ABC and DEF as equi triangles ABC sides 3,3,3 and DEF sides 2,2,2. Area of ABC (3,3,3) = \(x^2\) \(\sqrt{3}/4\) = 9\(\sqrt{3}/4\) ~ 4.25 Perimeter of DEF (2,2,2) = 2+2+2 = 6 So Is Ar. of ABC > Ar. of DEF ? ........ Clearly YES Fact 2  Angles of ABC = Angles of DEF We already proved in Fact 1 that its INSUFFICIENT. Combining Fact 1 and Fact 2 , we have nothing new. Hence E
_________________
Sortem sternit fortem!



Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2017
Posts: 19

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Mar 2018, 12:21
The question can also be solved by applying the property of similar triangles, i.e, When two triangles (lets say Triangle ABC and Triangle DEF) are similar, the the ratio of the area of the triangles is equal to the squares of their respective perimeter, sides, medians, heights etc. So, Area(ABC)/Area(DEF)=[Perimeter(ABC)]^2/[Perimeter(DEF)]^2 Now, from St.(1) The value of area of ABC is less than that of perimeter of DEF>We cannot conclude anything>insufficient. from St.(2) Angles of ABC = Angles of DEF>Can only conclude that the triangles are similar(using the AAA property)>Insufficient from St.1 and St.2: Since ABC and DEF are similar triangles, thus, Area(ABC)/Area(DEF)=[Perimeter(ABC)]^2/[Perimeter(DEF)]^2eqn1 Now, St. 1 says area of ABC is less than that of perimeter of DEF.Applying this logic on eqn1 nd taking some integer values, we can see that the Perimeter(DEF)>Perimeter (ABC); thus Area (ABC)<Area(DEF). [No] On taking decimal values on eqn1, we get that the Perimeter(DEF)<Perimeter (ABC); thus Area (ABC)>Area(DEF)....[Yes] Thus insufficient.
_________________
Thanks, Rnk
Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful



Intern
Joined: 08 May 2018
Posts: 7

Re M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Aug 2018, 03:17
I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate.



Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 49
Location: Azerbaijan
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V21 GMAT 2: 600 Q42 V31 GMAT 3: 700 Q47 V38

Re: M0722
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2018, 11:00
I solved this question like this.
Drew two equal right triangles ABC and DEF with sides 3, 4 and 5. Area of each triangle is 6 and perimeter of each triangle is 12.
(1) says that value of area of ABC is less than value of perimeter of DEF.
If we change nothing, area of ABC will be equal to the area of DEF and (1) will be satisfied, i.e. 6 is less than 12. In this case answer to the question is no
However, if we multiply each side of DEF by 0.99999999 then, area of DEF will be less than area of ABC. After multiplying each side by 0.9999999 perimeter of DEF will be slightly less than 12. Therefore statement (1) will be satisfied, because value of perimeter will definitely be greater than 6. In this case answer to the question yes
insufficient
(2) above mentioned example is valid for statement 2 as well,
(1) and (2) together. Above mentioned example satisfies both statements, and we get both yes and no, therefore answer is E










