Last visit was: 13 May 2026, 02:57 It is currently 13 May 2026, 02:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
 [13]
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
814,613
 [2]
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
buddyisraelgmat
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Last visit: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 67
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
bazu
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 81
Posts: 37
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Note that:

A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.

B. \(0!=1\).

C. Only two factorials are odd: \(0!=1\) and \(1!=1\).

D. Factorial of a number which is prime is \(2!=2\).

(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number. This implies that \(b!=odd\). Thus \(b\) is 0 or 1. But if \(b=0\), then \(a\) is a negative number, so in this case \(a!\) is not defined. Therefore \(a=0\) and \(b=1\), so the set is \(\{0!, \ 1!, \ c!\}=\{1, \ 1, \ c!\}\). Now, if \(c=2\), then the answer is YES but if \(c\) is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number. This implies that \(c=2\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we have that \(a=0\), \(b=1\) and \(c=2\), thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.


Answer: C

Hi Bunuel, why c=2 is not enough? if a and b are integers and a<b<c with c = aren't we sure b=1 and a=0? What else could it be? Could you please clarify this?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
814,613
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bazu
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Note that:

A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.

B. \(0!=1\).

C. Only two factorials are odd: \(0!=1\) and \(1!=1\).

D. Factorial of a number which is prime is \(2!=2\).

(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number. This implies that \(b!=odd\). Thus \(b\) is 0 or 1. But if \(b=0\), then \(a\) is a negative number, so in this case \(a!\) is not defined. Therefore \(a=0\) and \(b=1\), so the set is \(\{0!, \ 1!, \ c!\}=\{1, \ 1, \ c!\}\). Now, if \(c=2\), then the answer is YES but if \(c\) is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number. This implies that \(c=2\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we have that \(a=0\), \(b=1\) and \(c=2\), thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.


Answer: C

Hi Bunuel, why c=2 is not enough? if a and b are integers and a<b<c with c = aren't we sure b=1 and a=0? What else could it be? Could you please clarify this?

Why is it necessary if c=2, a and b to be 0 and 1? Why cannot a be -100 and b be -17?
avatar
bazu
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2020
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 81
Posts: 37
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
bazu
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Note that:

A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.

B. \(0!=1\).

C. Only two factorials are odd: \(0!=1\) and \(1!=1\).

D. Factorial of a number which is prime is \(2!=2\).

(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number. This implies that \(b!=odd\). Thus \(b\) is 0 or 1. But if \(b=0\), then \(a\) is a negative number, so in this case \(a!\) is not defined. Therefore \(a=0\) and \(b=1\), so the set is \(\{0!, \ 1!, \ c!\}=\{1, \ 1, \ c!\}\). Now, if \(c=2\), then the answer is YES but if \(c\) is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number. This implies that \(c=2\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we have that \(a=0\), \(b=1\) and \(c=2\), thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.


Answer: C

Hi Bunuel, why c=2 is not enough? if a and b are integers and a<b<c with c = aren't we sure b=1 and a=0? What else could it be? Could you please clarify this?

Why is it necessary if c=2, a and b to be 0 and 1? Why cannot a be -100 and b be -17?

Thanks Bunuel, I hope I was only tired, I don't know why but I had in my mind that a b c where positive integers.
avatar
alexlovesgmat
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 29 Aug 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
With all respect
As it is mentioned factorial of a negative is undefined. Then how can the -17 ! be in scope?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alexlovesgmat
With all respect
As it is mentioned factorial of a negative is undefined. Then how can the -17 ! be in scope?

Where do you see factorial of negative number there?

For (2) we only know that c cannot be negative but you cannot use info from (1) when considering (2).
avatar
alexlovesgmat
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 29 Aug 2020
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 13
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Omg thanks bunuel
User avatar
shashankism
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Last visit: 19 Feb 2026
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Affiliations: IIT Dhanbad
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 608
Kudos: 714
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) are integers and \(a \lt b \lt c\), are \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) consecutive integers?


(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number.

Given : a,b,c are integers and a<b<c.

DS : What needs to be checked is whether a,b,c are consecutive integers.

Now lets start checking the options :
(1) median of {a!,b!,c!} is odd number. So b =1. Because if b=0, a will become -ve, if b=2, a will become even
a<b<c. Hence, a=0, b=1, we don't know anything about c. can be 2,3,4,.... So NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) c! is a prime number. So c can be 2 only because if c=3,4,.... c! wont be a prime number.
Now a<b<c and a,b,c are integers So, we know that c=2 , but we can't say anything about a,b can be 1,0,-1,-2.............. NOT Sufficient

Combined : a=0, b=1, c=2.

Answer C.
User avatar
shashankism
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Last visit: 19 Feb 2026
Posts: 608
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Affiliations: IIT Dhanbad
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 608
Kudos: 714
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alexlovesgmat
With all respect
As it is mentioned factorial of a negative is undefined. Then how can the -17 ! be in scope?

By option (2) you can't say anything about a or b. Its just we know that a,d<c i.e.2
So a,b can be 1,0,-1,-2,-3.....................,-100,...................., -infinity.
User avatar
tinyinthedesert
Joined: 26 Feb 2018
Last visit: 14 Jun 2021
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Location: United Arab Emirates
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V41
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47
Products:
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V47
Posts: 59
Kudos: 70
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Does anyone know if the GMAT tests that 0! is 1? I've never seen this on an OG question
avatar
srishti02
Joined: 31 Jan 2018
Last visit: 22 Nov 2018
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Note that:

A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.

B. \(0!=1\).

C. Only two factorials are odd: \(0!=1\) and \(1!=1\).

D. Factorial of a number which is prime is \(2!=2\).

(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number. This implies that \(b!=odd\). Thus \(b\) is 0 or 1. But if \(b=0\), then \(a\) is a negative number, so in this case \(a!\) is not defined. Therefore \(a=0\) and \(b=1\), so the set is \(\{0!, \ 1!, \ c!\}=\{1, \ 1, \ c!\}\). Now, if \(c=2\), then the answer is YES but if \(c\) is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number. This implies that \(c=2\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we have that \(a=0\), \(b=1\) and \(c=2\), thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.


Answer: C

Hi Bunuel,

From the following Note, Point A: it was derived that in a<b<c, 'a' cannot be negative . For the Condition 1.
But if b=0, then a is a negative number, so in this case a! is not defined.

If we were to not take Point A in consideration then 'a' can very well be -17!

Note that:
A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.
B. 0!=10!=1.
C. Only two factorials are odd: 0!=10!=1 and 1!=11!=1.
D. Factorial of a number which is prime is 2!=22!=2.


Using Point A in the Note, why can't the same('a' and 'b' cannot be negative) be derived for Condition 2?
Condition 2 states that 'c' is prime. 2! is prime. Therefore, c=2.
Since a<b<c, therefore a and b can take 0 and 1 only iff Point A is considered here.

So why can't Point A be considered for Condition 2?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
srishti02
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Note that:

A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.

B. \(0!=1\).

C. Only two factorials are odd: \(0!=1\) and \(1!=1\).

D. Factorial of a number which is prime is \(2!=2\).

(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number. This implies that \(b!=odd\). Thus \(b\) is 0 or 1. But if \(b=0\), then \(a\) is a negative number, so in this case \(a!\) is not defined. Therefore \(a=0\) and \(b=1\), so the set is \(\{0!, \ 1!, \ c!\}=\{1, \ 1, \ c!\}\). Now, if \(c=2\), then the answer is YES but if \(c\) is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number. This implies that \(c=2\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we have that \(a=0\), \(b=1\) and \(c=2\), thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.


Answer: C

Hi Bunuel,

From the following Note, Point A: it was derived that in a<b<c, 'a' cannot be negative . For the Condition 1.
But if b=0, then a is a negative number, so in this case a! is not defined.

If we were to not take Point A in consideration then 'a' can very well be -17!

Note that:
A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.
B. 0!=10!=1.
C. Only two factorials are odd: 0!=10!=1 and 1!=11!=1.
D. Factorial of a number which is prime is 2!=22!=2.


Using Point A in the Note, why can't the same('a' and 'b' cannot be negative) be derived for Condition 2?
Condition 2 states that 'c' is prime. 2! is prime. Therefore, c=2.
Since a<b<c, therefore a and b can take 0 and 1 only iff Point A is considered here.

So why can't Point A be considered for Condition 2?

For (2) we only know that c cannot be negative but you cannot use info from (1) when considering (2).
avatar
pinguuu
Joined: 07 Oct 2014
Last visit: 06 Sep 2020
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 268
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please rewrite the question as it's hard to tell what the numbers represent in this format... thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pinguuu
Can someone please rewrite the question as it's hard to tell what the numbers represent in this format... thanks

Everything looks fine for me. Could you please try refreshing the page? If it does not help, please post a screenshot. Thank you.
avatar
PhilipLimantara
Joined: 11 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Mar 2021
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
srishti02
Bunuel
Official Solution:


Note that:

A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.

B. \(0!=1\).

C. Only two factorials are odd: \(0!=1\) and \(1!=1\).

D. Factorial of a number which is prime is \(2!=2\).

(1) The median of \(\{a!, \ b!, \ c!\}\) is an odd number. This implies that \(b!=odd\). Thus \(b\) is 0 or 1. But if \(b=0\), then \(a\) is a negative number, so in this case \(a!\) is not defined. Therefore \(a=0\) and \(b=1\), so the set is \(\{0!, \ 1!, \ c!\}=\{1, \ 1, \ c!\}\). Now, if \(c=2\), then the answer is YES but if \(c\) is any other number then the answer is NO. Not sufficient.

(2) \(c!\) is a prime number. This implies that \(c=2\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we have that \(a=0\), \(b=1\) and \(c=2\), thus the answer to the question is YES. Sufficient.


Answer: C

Hi Bunuel,

From the following Note, Point A: it was derived that in a<b<c, 'a' cannot be negative . For the Condition 1.
But if b=0, then a is a negative number, so in this case a! is not defined.

If we were to not take Point A in consideration then 'a' can very well be -17!

Note that:
A. The factorial of a negative number is undefined.
B. 0!=10!=1.
C. Only two factorials are odd: 0!=10!=1 and 1!=11!=1.
D. Factorial of a number which is prime is 2!=22!=2.


Using Point A in the Note, why can't the same('a' and 'b' cannot be negative) be derived for Condition 2?
Condition 2 states that 'c' is prime. 2! is prime. Therefore, c=2.
Since a<b<c, therefore a and b can take 0 and 1 only iff Point A is considered here.

So why can't Point A be considered for Condition 2?

For (2) we only know that c cannot be negative but you cannot use info from (1) when considering (2).

Hi Bunuel,
For statement 2, c! is a prime number and we know from the information initially that a, b, and c are integers and a<b<c. If we are using the common concept that the factorial of a negative number is undefined, why cant we conclude that when C=2, b=1 and a=0? Why do we need to consider the possibility of a negative integer for a and b when the common concept that we know is that the factorial of a negative number is negative?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 110,322
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 106,218
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,322
Kudos: 814,613
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Duplicate of D01-20. Unpublished.
Moderators:
Math Expert
110322 posts
Founder
43270 posts