Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
In general, for absolute values, you must have \(AA\) to happen. Thus, if you can take the 1st step of the variable approach and modify the original condition and the question, you get from \(| a - b + c | - a + b - c > 0\), \(| a - b + c | > a - b + c\), to \(a - b + c < 0\)?, and then to \(a + c < b\).
Therefore, con 1) is yes and sufficient, and in the case of con 2), \((a, b, c) = (1, 3, 1)\) is yes, and \((a, b, c)=(1, 1, 1)\) is no, hence it is not sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.