Last visit was: 23 Jul 2024, 11:41 It is currently 23 Jul 2024, 11:41
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2023
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [15]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Schools: Kellogg (A)
GMAT Focus 1:
745 Q90 V88 DI83
GPA: 7.8
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Posts: 3125
Own Kudos [?]: 5148 [0]
Given Kudos: 1859
Location: India
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2023
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: India
Schools: Kellogg (A)
GMAT Focus 1:
745 Q90 V88 DI83
GPA: 7.8
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy [#permalink]
GMATNinja MartyMurray what is the issue with E? If the managers are not good at hiring shouldn't that be a challenge? Please help, thanks!
Tutor
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Posts: 429
Own Kudos [?]: 1204 [4]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Re: Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Vaishvii wrote:
GMATNinja MartyMurray what is the issue with E? If the managers are not good at hiring shouldn't that be a challenge? Please help, thanks!

Vaishvii Important question! It's essential to focus on finding a challenge with the EXACT plan in the passage, which is a prediction about a future outcome of a certain action. We are not looking for just any "challenge"; it must connect to the future goal and action specified by the plan.

In general, on a "Plan" question, we want to make sure we understand the Goal and the Action:

Goal: "gradually improve average employee productivity"

Action: "a new policy of filling permanent positions in the company only with people who have already worked for the company in temporary positions. ...workers who proved less productive in the temporary positions will not be hired for the permanent positions."

In summary, the plan is to test out the workers first, and make them prove themselves, before promoting them from temporary positions to permanent positions.

Therefore, E is actually a strengthener for this plan, and an Opposite trap. E is a challenge with how things have been done in the past — managers have been unsuccessful at predicting a worker's productivity "before hiring them", so this plan of making the workers prove themselves in a temporary position makes a lot of sense as a future improvement.

In general, it's helpful to be aware of tenses and timelines.

Please let me know if this helps or if you have further questions!
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2023
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Re: Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy [#permalink]
1
Kudos
GMATCoachBen wrote:
Vaishvii wrote:
GMATNinja MartyMurray what is the issue with E? If the managers are not good at hiring shouldn't that be a challenge? Please help, thanks!

Vaishvii Important question! It's essential to focus on finding a challenge with the EXACT plan in the passage, which is a prediction about a future outcome of a certain action. We are not looking for just any "challenge"; it must connect to the future goal and action specified by the plan.

In general, on a "Plan" question, we want to make sure we understand the Goal and the Action:

Goal: "gradually improve average employee productivity"

Action: "a new policy of filling permanent positions in the company only with people who have already worked for the company in temporary positions. ...workers who proved less productive in the temporary positions will not be hired for the permanent positions."

In summary, the plan is to test out the workers first, and make them prove themselves, before promoting them from temporary positions to permanent positions.

Therefore, E is actually a strengthener for this plan, and an Opposite trap. E is a challenge with how things have been done in the past — managers have been unsuccessful at predicting a worker's productivity "before hiring them", so this plan of making the workers prove themselves in a temporary position makes a lot of sense as a future improvement.

In general, it's helpful to be aware of tenses and timelines.

Please let me know if this helps or if you have further questions!

Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2024
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 40
Re: Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy [#permalink]
Can someone comment on my thinking?

Technically, the argument is about improving the average productivity of the workers. This means average of full-time and temporary workers.

Answer choice B is saying that most of the temp workers would be more highly motivated and that they are not as highly motivated as they would be as permanent worker.

Does this not mean that by having more temp workers as part of this new temp-to-permanent requirement, that the average productivity will be lower?

Think of it as a weighted average questions.

Temps are less productive than permanent. If we increase ratio of temps in the workforce, then average productivity will be lower.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2024
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 7.72
Re: Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy [#permalink]
GMATCoachBen wrote:
Vaishvii wrote:
GMATNinja MartyMurray what is the issue with E? If the managers are not good at hiring shouldn't that be a challenge? Please help, thanks!

Vaishvii Important question! It's essential to focus on finding a challenge with the EXACT plan in the passage, which is a prediction about a future outcome of a certain action. We are not looking for just any "challenge"; it must connect to the future goal and action specified by the plan.

In general, on a "Plan" question, we want to make sure we understand the Goal and the Action:

Goal: "gradually improve average employee productivity"

Action: "a new policy of filling permanent positions in the company only with people who have already worked for the company in temporary positions. ...workers who proved less productive in the temporary positions will not be hired for the permanent positions."

In summary, the plan is to test out the workers first, and make them prove themselves, before promoting them from temporary positions to permanent positions.

Therefore, E is actually a strengthener for this plan, and an Opposite trap. E is a challenge with how things have been done in the past — managers have been unsuccessful at predicting a worker's productivity "before hiring them", so this plan of making the workers prove themselves in a temporary position makes a lot of sense as a future improvement.

In general, it's helpful to be aware of tenses and timelines.

Please let me know if this helps or if you have further questions!

­Hi, could you please help in eliminating option C. My thinking was that since fewer permanent positions are available than productive workers then the productive workers who are not selected for the permanent jobs will be demotivated and not be as productive.

As I am writing this I realise I made a bit of a leap.
Re: Managers at the Empresa corporation plan to implement a new policy [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6991 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts