sperumba wrote:
allabout ,
I have not yet taken the
MGMAT test. will post my experience and scores as soon as i take them.
I was asking those questions because i was not sure if I should take the test or not. I have a loads of tests with me ..so was just being picky. I did not want to waste time on a test that is not representative.
Looks like form your experince, this might be a good test to take.
Will keep you posted.
Thanks for all the feed back.
Since you've asked about the
MGMAT practice exams, here's my experience.
I've taken 3 so far and they are reasonably close to the actual ETS practice exams. They are adapative and timed right down to the breaks (you only get 5 min between quant and verbal and test will start w/o you). I think the difficulty is about the same as the actual exam.
The only complaint I have is their quant questions (which are licensed from Cambridge Software) were WAY heavy on Geometry. I estimate
MGMAT's tests give you 30 to 40% of geometry compared to actual GMAT exam %'s being far lower.
One benefit of
MGMAT's exams is a decent explanation of answers though it's pretty clear Cambridge is probably a British company given some of the rare colloquial phrases used (X gets on well with Y vs X relates to Y). Nothing major.