It is currently 27 Jun 2017, 03:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1657
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2010, 21:16
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

29% (01:39) correct 71% (00:40) wrong based on 25 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

His campaign for sanitary conditions in operating rooms finally successful, Sir Joseph Lister lent his name to the company that developed Listerine, the first antibacterial liquid.

(A) His campaign for sanitary conditions in operating rooms finally successful
(B) Since his campaign for sanitary conditions in operating rooms had been eventually successful
(C) Because of the eventual success of his campaigning for sanitary conditions in operating rooms
(D) His campaign for sanitary conditions in operating rooms being eventually successful
(E) Campaigning, eventually successfully, for conditions to be sanitary in operating rooms

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Hi,
I have been using the Manhattan GMAT SC book, and they suggest to use the "Splits and Re-splits" method. Through this system, you have to scan the answer choices vertically - without read them - looking for differences that split the answer choices.
After that, you have to eliminate the splits which are wrong.

Ok, probably that method is Ok when you have a question in which the answer choices only are different in certain words, but what to do when you face a question like this? Anyone who is using the MGMAT SC, please? How effective is that approach when the choices are totally different?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

 Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes Math Revolution Discount Codes e-GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Posts: 91
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2010, 23:49
1
KUDOS
Basically, for these kind of questions and the questions where there are totally different wordings, first of all try to understand the given sentence.
Look out for the errors in the options. Most of the time you would be able to remove 3 options. Now, judge based on conciseness, active/passive, etc rules which you already know.

By the way, Here I guess the answer is A.
"His campaign for sanitary conditions in operating rooms finally successful" is an absolute phrase and it modifies the followed independent clause.

D, E easy to eliminate.
B,C -> change the meaning.
Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 177
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 00:38
2
KUDOS
This scanning method many times goes wrong for me because most of the time instead of looking for the best answer and without understanding question completely, I go for differences in the options and end up with some wrong answer. Here Choice A has perfect grammar but it is not going with the remaining sentence.

According to me one has to understand the what part is underlined portion is playing and what does it mean

For example, In the given question the underlined part is an dependent clause and it is also a cause for some information mentioned after underlined part.

Therefore, we have to search for an answer that will show reason. Now if we scan the answers we can understand that choices A, D, and E can stand there own except pronoun, but they are independent clauses and not really forming a reason for why Sir Joseph Lister lent his name to the company that developed Listerine.
So, we can short list choices B and C

Now, if we scan further then we can make out that choice C contains "success of his campaigningfor sanitary" .... Unnecessary use of progressive tense .... so we can finalize on choice "B"

Also, Choice "B" is forming a cause or reason for the further statement and it is using perfect past tense that shows us that this action is happened before Sir Joseph Lister give his name to antibacterial liquid.
A rule is mentioned in manhattan sentence correction that "If more than one action in a sentence occurred at different times in the past, you must use the past perfect tense for the earlier action and simple past for later action".

This is my view, please correct me if i m wrong. And please mention OA of the question.
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
Posts: 214
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.59
WE: Corporate Finance (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 02:28
1
KUDOS
I picked C as well.

OA is A.

(C) Because of the eventual success of his campaigning for sanitary conditions in operating rooms

Here is a subordinate clause. C seems to be past progressive, while A looks to be simple present tense. Given the context of the Sentence Construction, A is correct.

sc-campaign-for-sanitary-conditions-65575.html

Metallicafan,

For these types of problems, I don't think you can split/resplit. I use MGMAT and split/resplit is highly effective at the lower level questions. At these levels, pure knowledge has to be the key in identifying the error.

However, there are two splits you can make note of, Campaign and Campaigning, and Eventually Successful and Finally Successful. Mix and match.
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1657
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 04:31
Thanks buddies! Kudos for you
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 184
Schools: MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 07:51
Really great question here, metallicafan!

The scanning method does tend to work a little bit better when you have just a word or two that is changed. In this problem, you have a large part of the sentence that gets changed or shifted around. I would argue that:

1) This is often indicative of a modifier issue, so you might want to be on the lookout for modifier problems.

2) The split-resplit method doesn't work particularly well here not because you have a large part of a sentence underlined, but because you have a five-way split. This happens every now and then, and as others in this forum have shared, it's why we need to bother learning the grammar rather than trying to rely purely on tricks.

Great question! I love that you're thinking about the limitations of the strategies you see!

Brett
_________________

Brett Beach-Kimball | Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 195
Schools: Kelley Class of 2013
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 14:56
USCTrojan2006 wrote:
I picked C as well.

OA is A.

(C) Because of the eventual success of his campaigning for sanitary conditions in operating rooms
\

Note that C is wrong for an additional reason as well. "because of" introduces nouns/pronouns, and "because" introduces clauses. In this answer, "because of" is introducing a clause.

Tom
Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 167
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 18:47
C is also wrong because you are starting a sentence with Because. I don't think B can be right in this case because the past perfect does not seem to make sense either.

I selected A. Choices such as B and C change the meaning of the sentence in suggesting that it was because of his campaigns that he decided to lent his name.
Intern
Status: Application submitted
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 38
Location: NYC
Schools: Stern
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2010, 19:06
I think correct answer should be B.
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 184
Schools: MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2010, 10:30
Quick note here about the "meaning" issue mentioned in several posts on this thread:

Keep in mind that "meaning" is not as important on SC as "grammar." Grammar is king, and meaning is only a secondary consideration. For those of you who rule out answer choices because of a meaning issue: Did you find grammatical issues wrong with them first? If not, beware of crossing them off.

Furthermore: While I agree that B and C change the meaning by making a more explicit causal link between the successful campaign and the naming right, the real deal with "meaning" on SC is not "does it change in meaning?" as much as it is "Is the meaning logical?"

For example, if A says:

"Yesterday, I walked to that pizza restaurant that was built in 1947."

"In 1947, I walked to new pizza restaurant that was built yesterday."

Then you have a problem because it's illogical and nonsensical to say you walked to something that wasn't yet built.

Brett
_________________

Brett Beach-Kimball | Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2010
Posts: 90
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2011, 06:27
I think the answer is B. In this option, we can easily see the cause and conclusion. Since=because

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10147
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2016, 03:19
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Manhattan GMAT: Split and re-split method   [#permalink] 29 Jul 2016, 03:19
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 Common splits on GMAT sentence correction 2 13 Aug 2016, 07:48
5 GMAT OG-SC Q' s Break-up/ Split 2 28 Jul 2015, 22:20
4 Manhattan GMAT Ch.12 question 5 25 Nov 2013, 11:24
Grammar Fundamentals For Magoosh or Manhattan GMAT 0 30 Aug 2013, 13:45
7 According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect. 7 06 Jan 2017, 08:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by