Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 17 Jul 2019, 10:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 497
Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 11 Feb 2019, 18:03
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question, so we can narrow the options down to get the to right answer quickly! To get started, here is the original question with the major differences between each option highlighted in orange:

Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer the battery can be expected to last.

A) if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer
B) rating the watt-hour higher, it is that much longer
C) the higher the watt-hour rating, the longer
D) the higher the watt-hour rating, it is that much longer that
E) when the watt-hour rating is higher, the longer it is

After glancing over the options quickly, it's clear the only thing that's consistent between all the options is the words "higher" and "longer." It also looks like this sentence is attempting to use the following idiomatic structure:

The -er the X, the -er the Y.

For this structure to work, both X and Y need to be written using parallel format.

Since idiomatic structure is an easy way to knock out options quickly, let's see which options follow this format, and rule out those that don't:

A) if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer

B) rating the watt-hour higher, it is that much longer
(*This sentence also has a vague pronoun "it" in the second half of the phrase.)

C) the higher the watt-hour rating, the longer

D) the higher the watt-hour rating, it is that much longer that
(*This sentence also has a vague pronoun "it" with no clear antecedent.)

E) when the watt-hour rating is higher, the longer it is
(*This sentences also has a vague pronoun "it" with no clear antecedent.)

There you go - option C is the only one that follows the idiomatic structure correctly. If you familiarize yourself with common idiomatic structures, you will find these are some of the quickest to answer!

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________

Originally posted by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 04 Sep 2018, 10:09.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 11 Feb 2019, 18:03, edited 2 times in total.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 497
Re: Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2018, 10:10
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question, so we can narrow the options down to get the to right answer quickly! To get started, here is the original question with the major differences between each option highlighted in orange:

Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer the battery can be expected to last.

A) if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer
B) rating the watt-hour higher, it is that much longer
C) the higher the watt-hour rating, the longer
D) the higher the watt-hour rating, it is that much longer that
E) when the watt-hour rating is higher, the longer it is

After glancing over the options quickly, it's clear the only thing that's consistent between all the options is the words "higher" and "longer." It also looks like this sentence is attempting to use the following idiomatic structure:

The -er the X, the -er the Y.

For this structure to work, both X and Y need to be written using parallel format.

Since idiomatic structure is an easy way to knock out options quickly, let's see which options follow this format, and rule out those that don't:

A if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer

B rating the watt-hour higher, it is that much longer
(*This sentence also has a vague pronoun "it" in the second half of the phrase.)

C the higher the watt-hour rating, the longer

D the higher the watt-hour rating, it is that much longer that
(*This sentence also has a vague pronoun "it" with no clear antecedent.)

E when the watt-hour rating is higher, the longer it is
(*This sentences also has a vague pronoun "it" with no clear antecedent.)

There you go - option C is the only one that follows the idiomatic structure correctly.If you familiarize yourself with common idiomatic structures, you will find these are some of the quickest to answer!

Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
Manager
Status: wake up with a purpose
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Posts: 54
Concentration: Accounting, Entrepreneurship
Re: Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2019, 12:39
macjas wrote:
Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer the battery can be expected to last.

A if they rate the watt-hour higher, the longer
B rating the watt-hour higher, it is that much longer
C the higher the watt-hour rating, the longer
D the higher the watt-hour rating, it is that much longer that
E when the watt-hour rating is higher, the longer it is

The answers appear to vary significantly, signaling likely Structure, Meaning, Modifier, or Parallelism issues.

Issues

(1) Meaning / Pronoun: they

The pronoun they must be referring to manufacturers (before the semicolon) because batteries cannot rate things. The second
half, then, says: if manufacturers rate [batteries] higher, then the battery will last longer.

The manufacturers could make longer-lasting batteries, but answer (A) implies that simply changing the rating given to a
battery will cause it to last longer. That doesn't make any sense;
the actual battery would have to first last longer in order to
deserve the higher rating. Eliminate answer (A).

(2) Parallelism: higher X, longer Y

The sentence contains a cause-effect structure that needs to be parallel.

(A) if they rate X higher the longer the Y
(B) rating X higher it is that much longer the Y
(C) the higher the X the longer the Y
(D) the higher the X it is that much longer that the Y
(E) when the X is higher the longer it is the Y

Answers (A), (B), (D), and (E) are all wrong; not one offers a parallel structure for X and Y. Eliminate answers (A), (B), (D),
and (E).

The Correct Answer (C) offers the only parallel option: the higher the X, the longer the Y.
_________________
If people are NOT laughing at your GOALS, your goals are SMALL.
Re: Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the   [#permalink] 20 Mar 2019, 12:39

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Manufacturers rate batteries in watt-hours; if they rate the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne