It is currently 22 Feb 2018, 08:56

TODAY:

MIT Sloan Releasing 1st Wave of Interview Invites - Join GMATClub CHAT for Live Updates


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Posts: 271
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2017, 04:59
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:02) correct 44% (01:11) wrong based on 77 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse in the next earthquake. To meet
the building code, houses must contain structural stabilizers sufficient to withstand an earthquake
of 6 or lesser magnitude on the Richter scale.Dora’s house meets the building code , so
Dora’s house will survive the next earthquake.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second
portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.
B. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second portion
is evidence in support of that conclusion.
C. The first portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence; the
second portion is evidence in support of that conclusion.
D. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion
that is not necessarily true based on the evidence.
E. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion
that must be true based on the evidence.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Kudos-----> If my post was Helpful

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 891
CAT Tests
Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2017, 13:14
An easy "D"

Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse in the next earthquake. To meet
the building code, houses must contain structural stabilizers sufficient to withstand an earthquake
of 6 or lesser magnitude on the Richter scale.Dora’s house meets the building code , so
Dora’s house will survive the next earthquake.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second
portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence. - First is not a conclusion

B. The first portion is a conclusion that must be true based on the evidence; the second portion
is evidence in support of that conclusion. - First is not a conclusion

C. The first portion is a conclusion that is not necessarily true based on the evidence; the
second portion is evidence in support of that conclusion. - First is not a conclusion

D. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion
that is not necessarily true based on the evidence. - Correct

E. The first portion is evidence that supports the argument; the second portion is a conclusion
that must be true based on the evidence.- The premise states that houses will not collapse if they have a structure to withstand an earthquake of 6 or lesser magnitude. Consider a situation if an earthquake of magnitude >6 (say 10) occurs: in such a scenario Dora's house will collapse. Thus second part of the option is wrong
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC

Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 38
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.29
Reviews Badge
Re: Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2017, 07:48
This is not 700 level question.
Re: Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse   [#permalink] 30 Apr 2017, 07:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Many houses that do not meet the building code will collapse

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.