Many people dislike being criticized by others, so a frequent response to criticism is to impugn the critic’s own behavior. This response is foolish, though, because the critic’s own behavior has little bearing on the validity of the critique being offered.
The reasoning in the argument above most closely parallels which of the following?
A. If someone is a smoker, it is foolish for that person to argue that smoking is unhealthy. If the individual truly believed that smoking was unhealthy, he or she would not smoke.
B. It would be foolish to criticize a philosopher’s argument that free will doesn’t exist simply because the philosopher acts as if there is free will.
C. In a situation where both parties are at fault, it would be foolish to admit wrongdoing first because neither party has the moral high ground.
D. It is silly to get upset when an individual lies to you. Everybody lies at some point or another, so there is no reason to get upset over such a common failing.
E. A critic should not attack a person for a fault the critic himself possesses. To do so would be foolish because it would reveal the critic as a hypocrite.
Source: McGraw Hills GMAT
Difficulty Level: 700