I found this passage extremely tough and used Gemini to understand it and come to conclusions, if any of the explanations seem incorrect would request to correct my understanding.
1. The author of the passage develops her points about Johnson primarily by
A. Contrasting Johnson’s critical methods with those of his contemporaries
B. Citing specific illustrations drawn from Johnson’s work
C. Alluding to contemporary comments about Johnson’s theories
D. Quoting Johnson’s remarks about the critical approaches prevalent in his own day
E. Emphasizing the fallacies inherent in the most common view of Johnson
(B) because throughout the text, we have seen the author relying on specific examples from Johnson's writings to validate her arguments. She cites his argument against the "three unities," his defense of the "tragicomic" mode in Shakespeare, his critique of Addison’s Cato, and direct quotes from his Life of Dryden.
2. The passage implies that the judging of literary works according to preconceived rules
A. Tends to lessen the effectiveness of much modern literary criticism
B. Is the primary distinguishing mark of the neoclassical critic
C. Was the primary neoclassical technique against which the Romantics rebelled
D. Is the underlying basis of much of Johnson’s critical work
E. Characterizes examples of the worst neoclassical criticism
(E) because in paragraph 2, the author mentions that Johnson was well aware of the "sterility of literary criticism that is legalistic or pedantic, as was the case with the worst products of the neoclassical school." Legalistic and pedantic criticism is exactly what judging by preconceived rules refers to, mapping directly to "the worst products of the neoclassical school." (Legalistic and pedantic criticism means criticizing something by focusing strictly on rules, laws, procedures, or technicalities, often without considering the broader purpose, fairness, practical reality focusing on minor details, trivial errors, or unnecessary precision.)
3. The passage implies that the neoclassical critics generally condemned
A. Shakespeare’s use of the “tragicomic” (line 18) literary mode
B. The slavish following of the “three unities” (line 16) in drama
C. Attempts to judge literary merit on the basis of “correctness” (line 28)
D. Artificiality and abstraction in literary works
E. The use of a special diction in the writing of poetry
(A) because paragraph 2 notes Johnson’s defense of the "supposedly illegitimate 'tragicomic' mode of Shakespeare's latest plays." Because it was viewed as "illegitimate" by the standard rules of that era, it implies that mainstream neoclassical critics generally condemned it.
4. According to the author, Johnson’s defense of Shakespeare’s latest plays illustrates Johnson’s reliance on which of the following in his criticism?
A. The sentiments endorsed by the Romantics
B. The criteria set forth by Wordsworth in his 1800 preface to the Lyrical Ballads
C. The precedents established by the Greek and Roman playwrights of the Classical Age
D. The principles followed by the neoclassical school of criticism
E. His own experience and judgment
(E) because when defending Shakespeare, the author quotes Johnson directly: "there is always an appeal from criticism to nature." This empirical standard means relying on direct human experience and observation of real life (nature) rather than the rigid textbook laws of the neoclassical school.
5. According to the passage, Johnson’s opinion of Addison’s Cato was
A. Roundly condemnatory
B. Somewhat self-contradictory
C. Ultimately negative
D. Effusively adulatory
E. Uncharacteristically bold
(C) because to "damn with faint praise" means to praising a few superficial or minor qualities of something so weakly that it actually functions as a total rejection or criticism. While Johnson concedes that the play has elegant structure and noble sentiments, his final, decisive verdict is that it fails fundamentally as poetry because it leaves the reader cold ("communicate no vibration to the heart").
6. According to the passage, Johnson’s views on the use of a special diction in the writing of poetry were
A. “modern” in their rejection of a clear-cut division between the diction of poetry and that of prose
B. “neoclassical” in their emphasis on the use of language that appeals directly to the emotions of the reader
C. “Romantic” in their defense of the idea that a special diction for poetry could be stylistically effective
D. “modern” in their underlying concern for the impact of the literary work on the sensibility of the reader
E. “neoclassical” in their emphasis on ease of comprehension as a literary virtue
(D) because in the final paragraph, the text states that on the question of poetic diction, Johnson’s views are surprisingly "modern." The author then explains why: for Johnson, poetic diction should serve the ends of "direct emotional impact and ease of comprehension," aiming to put the reader in closer contact with the subject matter. This translates to an underlying concern for the impact of the work on the reader's sensibility.
7. It can be inferred from the passage that in addition to being a literary critic, Johnson was also a
A. Surprisingly modern poet
B. Poet in the Augustan mode
C. Dramatist
D. Biographer
E. Naturalist
(D) because in the final paragraph, the author writes: "In his Life of Dryden, he defends..." A work titled “The Life of [X]” is a biography, which means Johnson acted as a biographer when writing it.
8. Which one of the following statements best summarizes the main point of the passage?
A. Although many of Johnson’s critical opinions resemble those of the neoclassical critics, his basic concerns are closer to those of the Romantics.
B. The usual classification of Johnson as a member of the neoclassical school of criticism is based on an inaccurate evaluation of his critical theories and ideals.
C. The Romantic critics were mistaken in their belief that the critical ideas they formulated represented a departure from those propounded by Johnson.
D. Although many of Johnson’s critical opinions resemble those of the Romantic critics, his basic concerns are closer to those of the neoclassical critics.
E. Johnson’s literary criticism represents an attempt to unify the best elements of the neoclassical and the Romantic schools of criticism.
(A) because it is the perfect summary as
Paragraph 1: Sets up the premise that while readers look at Johnson as a neoclassical critic (who would normally prefer formal/regulated styles), his actual close readings show a profound appreciation for natural, vivid, and specific details.
Paragraph 2 & 3: Explains how his deep structural concerns (like arguing against the "three unities," defending Shakespeare's tragi-comedies, and appealing to "nature over rules") line up perfectly with Romantic values.
Paragraph 4: Shows that even his defense of poetic diction was not based on cold neoclassical rules, but rather on achieving a direct emotional impact for the reader—another fundamentally Romantic concern.
Thus, the passage continuously acknowledges his label/resemblance to the neoclassicists but argues that his core, underlying motivations and concerns mirror the Romantics.
9. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with
A. Defending a reputation
B. Reconciling conflicting views
C. Comparing two schools of thought
D. Challenging an assumption
E. Presenting new evidence in support of an established theory
(D) because the author introduces a widespread belief “Many readers assume that, as a neoclassical literary critic, Samuel Johnson would normally prefer the abstract, the formal, and the regulated to the concrete, the natural, and the spontaneous in a work of literature. Yet any close reading of Johnson’s criticism shows that..." (the "assumption" held by many readers that Johnson is rigidly neoclassical and anti-spontaneous) and spends the entire passage using text evidence to challenge, undermine, and disprove that viewpoint by highlighting his alignment with Romantic values.