Pankaj0901
In the Option C, can I not consider the list of elements as below? This makes the two "and" compulsory, where the last one is nested inside the main list.
Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, and compared with sport utility vehicles,
- most cost less,
- get better gas mileage,
and
-
allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and
have a smoother, more car-like ride.
The last item is nothing but:
allow passengers to get in and our more easily, and {allow passengers to} have a smoother, more car-like ride.
Why is this structure (Option C) wrong?
AndrewN request your thoughts.
MontrealLady
Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, and compared with sport utility vehicles, most cost less, get better gas mileage, and make it easy for passengers to get in and out, and have a smoother, more car-like ride.
(A) and make it easy for passengers to get in and out
(B) and allow passengers to get in and out easily
(C) and allow passengers to get in and out more easily
(D) make it easier for passengers when getting in and out
(E) allow passengers to get in and out more easily
Hello,
Pankaj0901. It is true that any item in a list may branch internally. But in such cases, we expect to see one of two stylistic options to cue us in on how to interpret the list:
1) No comma before
and within the last item—
minivans cost less, get better gas mileage, and make X and have YReason: A comma before the second
and, combined with the different verbs in
make and
have, would make the sentence appear to be adding a fourth item in the list, in which case we may wonder why
and was placed ahead of the third item.
2) Semicolons instead of commas to separate items in the list when any item within that list contains commas—
minivans cost less; get better gas mileage; and make X, and have YReason: A visual cue that each item in a list has been completed reduces the probability that a reader will become confused about the branching third item.
I am not going to tell you that in a standalone sentence, the usage of a comma plus
and to introduce a phrase, rather than a clause, is incorrect. If only grammatical conventions were so easy to pin down. But when the punctuation and a word as simple as
and seem to paint two equally valid yet different pictures of the same sentence (three items or four in the list?), then we should look for a way to add clarity to the writing. That consideration, ultimately, allows us to rule out (C).
I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask.
- Andrew