Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 08:18 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 08:18 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
13 Aug 2023, 08:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
89% (01:38) correct
11%
(02:11)
wrong
based on 926
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Most economists agree that an international trade agreement that was recently signed will strengthen the economies of those countries participating in it. This benefit is expected to be noticeable even in the short term. Nevertheless, despite the fact that the number of business bankruptcies generally declines in a country when its economic performance improves, these same economists expect that countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the economists' expectation about business bankruptcies?
A. In the years before the new trade agreement was signed, major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed it had opposed it.
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
C. More countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement in the years after it takes effect.
D. Improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement is unlikely to have a significant impact on their near neighbors that are not participating.
E. The economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are much stronger than the economies of most other countries in the world.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the economists' expectation about business bankruptcies?
A. In the years before the new trade agreement was signed, major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed it had opposed it.
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
C. More countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement in the years after it takes effect.
D. Improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement is unlikely to have a significant impact on their near neighbors that are not participating.
E. The economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are much stronger than the economies of most other countries in the world.
Trying to understand why the right answer is right?
GMAT Club Tests explanations walk through concepts, shortcuts, and common traps on many questions.
See how →
13 Aug 2023, 08:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
The economists' expectation that countries participating in the trade agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect can be best justified by option:
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
This option provides a plausible reason for the increase in business bankruptcies. When tariffs that protect domestic businesses from foreign competition are eliminated, businesses may face tougher competition from international counterparts. This can lead to a higher likelihood of bankruptcy for businesses that were previously shielded by the tariffs. The increased competition could impact their ability to compete effectively in the international market, potentially leading to financial distress and bankruptcies.
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
This option provides a plausible reason for the increase in business bankruptcies. When tariffs that protect domestic businesses from foreign competition are eliminated, businesses may face tougher competition from international counterparts. This can lead to a higher likelihood of bankruptcy for businesses that were previously shielded by the tariffs. The increased competition could impact their ability to compete effectively in the international market, potentially leading to financial distress and bankruptcies.
General Discussion
13 Aug 2023, 08:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Paradox: The International Trade Agreement will strengthen the economies of those countries participating in it. Despite the fact that the number of business bankruptcies generally declines in a country when its economic performance improves, the countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect.
We have to find an option that resolves the paradox.
Answer choice elimination:
A. In the years before the new trade agreement was signed, major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed it had opposed it.
Two issues with this option-
1) The information presented in option A targets only a subset of the countries (...major political parties in some of the countries...), while the conclusion is regarding all the countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect.
2) The option doesn't present us with any valuable information that points out why the countries will experience an increase in business bankruptcies. Hence we can eliminate Option A.
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
Alright, so after the new trade agreement comes into effect, domestic businesses will experience increased competition. Hence, it is likely that because of this change, businesses may experience bankruptcy. We can keep this option.
C. More countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement in the years after it takes effect.
Not relevant to the paradox that we are trying to resolve. We need a piece of information that helps us understand whether something changes as a part of the international trade agreement for which the businesses may experience bankruptcy. We can eliminate this option.
D. Improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement is unlikely to have a significant impact on their near neighbors that are not participating.
The paradox is centered around the countries participating in the new agreement. The effect on their neighbors is irrelevant. Eliminate D.
E. The economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are much stronger than the economies of most other countries in the world.
This option deepens the paradox. We need a piece of information that helps us understand whether something changes as a part of the international trade agreement for which the businesses may experience bankruptcy. We can eliminate this option.
Option B
13 Aug 2023, 08:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
The question asks us to find the choice that "most helps to justify the economists' expectation about business bankruptcies."
That expectation is the following:
countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect
The passage provides no support for that expectation. So, the correct answer will provide a reason why "countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect" even though, as the passage says, economists agree that the agreement "will strengthen the economies of those countries participating in it," "this benefit is expected to be noticeable even in the short term," and "the number of business bankruptcies generally declines in a country when its economic performance improves."
A. In the years before the new trade agreement was signed, major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed it had opposed it.
It could be that the reason why major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed the agreement had opposed it was that members of those parties expected the agreement to cause an increase in business bankruptcies.
At the same time, we have no clear reason to believe that that reasoning underlies the opposition to the agreement by the major political parties.
Furthermore, even if members of those parties expected signing the agreement to result in bankruptcies, the simple fact that they expected that outcome does not justify that expectation. After all, the fact that someone expects something does not mean that that expectation is valid.
Eliminate.
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
This choice justifies the economists' expectation. After all, if the agreement will "eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries," then, even though the agreement "will strengthen the economies of those countries participating in it" overall, it makes sense that it will also cause some businesses in those countries to go bankrupt. After all, if a business is no longer protected from foreign competition, it may lose it's ability to operate profitably.
So, this choice provides reason to believe that economists' expectation is correct.
Keep.
C. More countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement in the years after it takes effect.
The fact that "more countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement " does not indicate that the agreement will cause business bankruptcies.
Eliminate.
D. Improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement is unlikely to have a significant impact on their near neighbors that are not participating.
The fact that "neighbors that are not participating" are unlikely to be impacted by "improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement" does not indicate that business bankruptcies will result from the new agreement.
Simply put, a lack of impact would not cause bankruptcies or anything else.
Eliminate.
E. The economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are much stronger than the economies of most other countries in the world.
Simply put, the fact that the economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are stronger than others clearly would not cause business bankruptcies in those countries.
If anything this choice is a reason why the economists' expectation would not be justified.
Eliminate.
The correct answer is
That expectation is the following:
countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect
The passage provides no support for that expectation. So, the correct answer will provide a reason why "countries participating in the agreement will experience an increase in business bankruptcies shortly after it takes effect" even though, as the passage says, economists agree that the agreement "will strengthen the economies of those countries participating in it," "this benefit is expected to be noticeable even in the short term," and "the number of business bankruptcies generally declines in a country when its economic performance improves."
A. In the years before the new trade agreement was signed, major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed it had opposed it.
It could be that the reason why major political parties in some of the countries that eventually signed the agreement had opposed it was that members of those parties expected the agreement to cause an increase in business bankruptcies.
At the same time, we have no clear reason to believe that that reasoning underlies the opposition to the agreement by the major political parties.
Furthermore, even if members of those parties expected signing the agreement to result in bankruptcies, the simple fact that they expected that outcome does not justify that expectation. After all, the fact that someone expects something does not mean that that expectation is valid.
Eliminate.
B. The new trade agreement will eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries from foreign competition.
This choice justifies the economists' expectation. After all, if the agreement will "eliminate tariffs that have protected businesses in participating countries," then, even though the agreement "will strengthen the economies of those countries participating in it" overall, it makes sense that it will also cause some businesses in those countries to go bankrupt. After all, if a business is no longer protected from foreign competition, it may lose it's ability to operate profitably.
So, this choice provides reason to believe that economists' expectation is correct.
Keep.
C. More countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement in the years after it takes effect.
The fact that "more countries are expected to sign the new trade agreement " does not indicate that the agreement will cause business bankruptcies.
Eliminate.
D. Improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement is unlikely to have a significant impact on their near neighbors that are not participating.
The fact that "neighbors that are not participating" are unlikely to be impacted by "improved economic performance among the countries participating in the new agreement" does not indicate that business bankruptcies will result from the new agreement.
Simply put, a lack of impact would not cause bankruptcies or anything else.
Eliminate.
E. The economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are much stronger than the economies of most other countries in the world.
Simply put, the fact that the economies of the countries participating in the new trade agreement are stronger than others clearly would not cause business bankruptcies in those countries.
If anything this choice is a reason why the economists' expectation would not be justified.
Eliminate.
The correct answer is
