It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 03:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2009, 20:52
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

51% (02:04) correct 49% (02:55) wrong based on 110

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

Question Stats:

46% (00:38) correct 54% (00:24) wrong based on 99

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

Question Stats:

57% (00:36) correct 43% (00:22) wrong based on 97

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

Question Stats:

55% (00:27) correct 45% (00:40) wrong based on 100

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

Question Stats:

78% (00:32) correct 22% (00:31) wrong based on 91

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

Question Stats:

64% (00:29) correct 36% (00:26) wrong based on 90

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

Question Stats:

75% (00:26) correct 25% (00:24) wrong based on 83

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 8
00:00

Question Stats:

40% (00:34) correct 60% (00:53) wrong based on 86

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 9
00:00

Question Stats:

58% (00:36) correct 43% (00:13) wrong based on 80

### HideShow timer Statistics

Quote:
Part of New RC Series- Please check this link for more questions

Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.

Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United states. These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.

Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) refute the theory that the free market plays a useful role in the development of industrialized societies

(B) suggest methods by which economists and members of the government of the United States can recognize and combat price-fixing by large firms

(C) show that in industrialized societies price-fixing and the operation of the free market are not only compatible but also mutually beneficial

(D) explain the various ways in which industrialized societies can fix prices in order to stabilize the free market

(E) argue that price-fixing, in one form or another, is an inevitable part of and benefit to the economy of any industrialized society

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E

2. The passage provides information that would answer which of the following questions about price-fixing?

I. What are some of the ways in which prices can be fixed?
II. For what products is price-fixing likely to be more profitable that the operation of the free market?
III. Is price-fixing more common in socialist industrialized societies or in non-socialist industrialized societies?

(A) I only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
A

3. The author’s attitude toward “Most economists in the United States” (line 1) can best be described as

(A) spiteful and envious
(B) scornful and denunciatory
(C) critical and condescending
(D) ambivalent but deferential
(E) uncertain but interested

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C

4. It can be inferred from the author’s argument that a price fixed by the seller “seems pernicious” (line 7) because

(A) people do not have confidence in large firms
(B) people do not expect the government to regulate prices
(C) most economists believe that consumers as a group should determine prices
(D) most economists associate fixed prices with communist and socialist economies
(E) most economists believe that no one group should determine prices

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
C

5. The suggestion in the passage that price-fixing in industrialized societies is normal arises from the author’s statement that price-fixing is

(A) a profitable result of economic development
(B) an inevitable result of the industrial system
(C) the result of a number of carefully organized decisions
(D) a phenomenon common to industrialized and non-industrialized societies
(E) a phenomenon best achieved cooperatively by government and industry

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

6. According to the author, price-fixing in non-socialist countries is often

(A) accidental but productive
(B) illegal but useful
(C) legal and innovative

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
E

7. According to the author, what is the result of the Soviet Union’s change in economic policy in the 1970’s?

(A) Soviet firms show greater profit.
(B) Soviet firms have less control over the free market.
(D) Soviet firms have some authority to fix prices.
(E) Soviet firms are more responsive to the free market.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
D

8. With which of the following statements regarding the behavior of large firms in industrialized societies would the author be most likely to agree?

(A) The directors of large firms will continue to anticipate the demand for products.

(B) The directors of large firms are less interested in achieving a predictable level of profit than in achieving a large profit.

(C) The directors of large firms will strive to reduce the costs of their products.

(D) Many directors of large firms believe that the government should establish the prices that will be charged for products.

(E) Many directors of large firms believe that the price charged for products is likely to increase annually.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
A

9. In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

(A) predicting the consequences of a practice
(B) criticizing a point of view
(C) calling attention to recent discoveries
(D) proposing a topic for research
(E) summarizing conflicting opinions

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #1 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #2 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #3 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #4 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #5 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #6 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #7 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #8 OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: Question #9 OA

Last edited by Gnpth on 12 Oct 2017, 14:24, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Jamboree Discount Codes Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 317

Kudos [?]: 157 [1], given: 14

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2009, 15:12
1
KUDOS
1-E
2-A
3-B
4-D
5-b
6-E
7-D
8-C
9-B

_________________

Kudos [?]: 157 [1], given: 14

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 800

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2009, 15:51
tough passage

I got

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2009, 09:34
1 C 08:22
2 A 00:53
3 C 00:36
4 C 02:07
5 D 01:21
6 E 00:17
7 B 00:25
8 A 00:39
9 B 00:18

At the noise!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Location: Hungary
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2009, 04:40
E
A
C
C
B
E
E
A
B

OA?

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 3

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2009, 00:47
e a c c b e d a b

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 18

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 807

Kudos [?]: 383 [0], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2009, 10:57
e e c c b a d a e

----

(13:34)
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 383 [0], given: 106

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 547 [0], given: 6

Location: Manchester UK
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2009, 12:49
Man....I got just 3 correct. This seemed to be one of the toughest. Hope not to get this kind on D-Day.

Kudos [?]: 547 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2009, 13:24
EACCBEDAB

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 199

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 16

Schools: Sloan '14 (S)
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Dec 2009, 05:29
1. E
2. A
3. C
4. C
5. B
6. E
7. d
8. a
9. b

Kudos [?]: 128 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2009, 05:28
Wats the OA

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Schools: MIT Sloan, BU School of Management
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2009, 06:38
Here are the OAs.

EACCBEDAB
_________________

Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind. ----Russell

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 204

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 7

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2010, 08:31
pmenon wrote:
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that is concerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.

Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United states. These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.

Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) refute the theory that the free market plays a useful role in the development of industrialized societies
(B) suggest methods by which economists and members of the government of the United States can recognize and combat price-fixing by large firms
(C) show that in industrialized societies price-fixing and the operation of the free market are not only compatible but also mutually beneficial
(D) explain the various ways in which industrialized societies can fix prices in order to stabilize the free market
(E) argue that price-fixing, in one form or another, is an inevitable part of and benefit to the economy of any industrialized society

2. The passage provides information that would answer which of the following questions about price-fixing?
I. What are some of the ways in which prices can be fixed?
II. For what products is price-fixing likely to be more profitable that the operation of the free market?
III. Is price-fixing more common in socialist industrialized societies or in non-socialist industrialized societies?
(A) I only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) II and III only
(E) I, II, and III
3. The author’s attitude toward “Most economists in the United States”(line 1) can best be described as
(A) spiteful and envious
(B) scornful and denunciatory
(C) critical and condescending
(D) ambivalent but deferential
(E) uncertain but interested

4. It can be inferred from the author’s argument that a price fixed by the seller “seems pernicious” (line 7) because
(A) people do not have confidence in large firms
(B) people do not expect the government to regulate prices
(C) most economists believe that consumers as a group should determine prices
(D) most economists associate fixed prices with communist and socialist economies
(E) most economists believe that no one group should determine prices

5. The suggestion in the passage that price-fixing in industrialized societies is normal arises from the author’s statement that price-fixing is
(A) a profitable result of economic development
(B) an inevitable result of the industrial system
(C) the result of a number of carefully organized decisions
(D) a phenomenon common to industrialized and non-industrialized societies
(E) a phenomenon best achieved cooperatively by government and industry

6. According to the author, price-fixing in non-socialist countries is often
(A) accidental but productive
(B) illegal but useful
(C) legal and innovative

7. According to the author, what is the result of the Soviet Union’s change in economic policy in the 1970’s?
(A) Soviet firms show greater profit.
(B) Soviet firms have less control over the free market.
(D) Soviet firms have some authority to fix prices.
(E) Soviet firms are more responsive to the free market.

8. With which of the following statements regarding the behavior of large firms in industrialized societies would the author be most likely to agree?
(A) The directors of large firms will continue to anticipate the demand for products.
(B) The directors of large firms are less interested in achieving a predictable level of profit than in achieving a large profit.
(C) The directors of large firms will strive to reduce the costs of their products.
(D) Many directors of large firms believe that the government should establish the prices that will be charged for products.
(E) Many directors of large firms believe that the price charged for products is likely to increase annually.

9. In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) predicting the consequences of a practice
(B) criticizing a point of view
(C) calling attention to recent discoveries
(D) proposing a topic for research
(E) summarizing conflicting opinions
cooldude929 is offline
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Reddit!

14 mins
A
A
C
C
B
A
D
C
B

OE plz!!
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 7

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2010, 13:52
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.
Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United states. These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.
Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.

3. The author’s attitude toward “Most economists in the United States”(line 1) can best be described as
(A) spiteful and envious
(B) scornful and denunciatory
(C) critical and condescending
(D) ambivalent but deferential
(E) uncertain but interested
4. It can be inferred from the author’s argument that a price fixed by the seller “seems pernicious” (line 7) because
(A) people do not have confidence in large firms
(B) people do not expect the government to regulate prices
(C) most economists believe that consumers as a group should determine prices
(D) most economists associate fixed prices with communist and socialist economies
(E) most economists believe that no one group should determine prices
8. With which of the following statements regarding the behavior of large firms in industrialized societies would the author be most likely to agree?
(A) The directors of large firms will continue to anticipate the demand for products.
(B) The directors of large firms are less interested in achieving a predictable level of profit than in achieving a large profit.
(C) The directors of large firms will strive to reduce the costs of their products.
(D) Many directors of large firms believe that the government should establish the prices that will be charged for products.
(E) Many directors of large firms believe that the price charged for products is likely to increase annually.
..............................

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 416

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 04:09
c d b

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 112

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 06:45
gauravnagpal wrote:
c d b

Btw you got the last 2 wrong

Last edited by goalsnr on 01 Aug 2010, 06:31, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 151 [1], given: 33

GPA: 4
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 09:41
1
KUDOS
3) c.
4) E. => "A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious" in the first paragraph
8) b => "Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size."

What is the OA?
_________________

-If you like my post, consider giving KUDOS

Kudos [?]: 151 [1], given: 33

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 1

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 22:04
C,C,A IMO
Not too sure about the last one. Just guessed it.
OA?

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2010, 06:33
bibha wrote:
C,C,A IMO
Not too sure about the last one. Just guessed it.
OA?

What is the reasoning behind the answer choices?

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 1

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2010, 07:29
2. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter, established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious.
This means that price should be determined by the consumer group.

3.Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products
As i said, that was a guess....i don't have any reason...Just saw the word "demand" haha

Kudos [?]: 238 [0], given: 1

Re: Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2010, 07:29

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 31 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by