Your Verbal review will be much more useful if you stop logging only question type and start logging reasoning failure.
For each missed/slow Verbal question, write:
- What was the task? strengthen, weaken, inference, detail, etc.
- What did I think the conclusion/main idea was?
- Why did I choose my answer?
- Why is the correct answer better?
- What trap did I fall for?
Then tag the actual error:
- misunderstood conclusion/main point
- missed a key qualifier
- picked an answer that was too strong
- picked something true but irrelevant
- confused evidence with conclusion
- brought in outside assumptions
- lost track of scope
- fatigue/timing
That will reveal patterns faster than “CR inference” vs “RC detail.” Often the real issue is scope, extreme wording, or not anchoring the answer to the passage/argument.
For the next 6-7 days, I’d avoid burning another mock too quickly. Do this instead:
Days 1-2: Deep review Mock 2, especially DI and Verbal. Review slow correct answers too.
Days 3-4: Target DI timing. Do mixed DI sets and practice quitting earlier on dense questions. If DI is last and you’re tired, you need stricter pacing.
Days 5-6: Verbal timed sets: 8-12 mixed CR/RC questions, then deep review using the reasoning-error tags above.
Day 7: Light review/
error log, then take Mock 3 under exact test conditions.
For section order, Verbal → Quant → DI may be hurting DI if you arrive mentally drained. Try to choose the order that protects your weakest timing section, not just your weakest content section.
I built a free GMAT planning tool from real debrief patterns that may help map 615/645-to-700 paths and resource use: prepsignals.vercel.app
Main point: your jump to 700+ likely comes from DI pacing + cleaner Verbal reasoning review, not just more questions.