Although I got this wrong but after realisation, here is the solution I come up with
Line 1 No senator spoke at the convention unless he or she was a Democrat
If Senator and spoke at convention, then a democrat
Line 2 No Democrat both spoke at the convention and was a senator.
If democrat, then no senator and spoke at the convention
Now evaluate options
(A) No one but senators spoke at the convention.- Too extreme "No one but senator"
(B) No Democrat spoke at the convention.- Incorrect logic, as per argument If democrat, then no senator and spoke at the convention
(C) Only Democrats spoke at the convention.- again "only" too extreme
(D) No senator spoke at the convention.- This logically follows, because we have to take both the statements correct
(E) Some Democrat senators spoke at the convention. if this is correct, then premise will not follow, since no democrat can be both.
Bunuel
No senator spoke at the convention unless he or she was a Democrat. No Democrat both spoke at the convention and was a senator.
Which one of the following conclusions can be correctly drawn from the statements above?
(A) No one but senators spoke at the convention.
(B) No Democrat spoke at the convention.
(C) Only Democrats spoke at the convention.
(D) No senator spoke at the convention.
(E) Some Democrat senators spoke at the convention.