|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
01 Jul 2008, 21:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Now thought to have been an actual historical city, the ruins of which have recently been excavated, Nineveh was long dismissed as Biblical legend by archaeologists, having no physical evidence that it had ever existed.
A Nineveh was long dismissed as Biblical legend by archaeologists, having
B Nineveh was long dismissed as Biblical legend by archaeologists, who had
C archaeologists long dismissed Nineveh as a Biblical legend, having
D archaeologists long dismissed Nineveh as Biblical legend and had
E archaeologists long dismissed Nineveh as Biblical legend; they had
A Nineveh was long dismissed as Biblical legend by archaeologists, having
B Nineveh was long dismissed as Biblical legend by archaeologists, who had
C archaeologists long dismissed Nineveh as a Biblical legend, having
D archaeologists long dismissed Nineveh as Biblical legend and had
E archaeologists long dismissed Nineveh as Biblical legend; they had
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
01 Jul 2008, 21:33
Kudos
Bookmarks
IMO B.
Underlined part is modifier for the city. So D, C, and E are wrong.
It is not city having no evidence rather archeologist had no evidence.
Underlined part is modifier for the city. So D, C, and E are wrong.
It is not city having no evidence rather archeologist had no evidence.
01 Jul 2008, 23:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
C, D, E are out because they make the first clause “Now thought to have been an actual historical city” modify the archaeologists.
B is out because, here, the last clause refers to archaeologists.
A is correct. The first clause refers to Nineveh. The last clause refers to Biblical legend
B is out because, here, the last clause refers to archaeologists.
A is correct. The first clause refers to Nineveh. The last clause refers to Biblical legend
