It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 12:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# one who (2 logic questions)

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 0

one who (2 logic questions) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 01:04
Questions 1—2
A physician who is too through in conducting a medical checkup is likely to subject the patient to the discomfort and expense of unnecessary tests. One who is not thorough enough is likely to miss some serious problem and therefore give the patient a false sense of security. It is difficult for physicians to judge exactly how thorough they should be. Therefore, it is generally unwise for patients to have medical checkups when they do not feel ill.

1. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument in the passage?

(A) Some serious diseases in their early stages have symptoms that physicians can readily detect.
(B) Under the pressure of reduced reimbursements, physicians have been reducing the average amount of time they spend on each medical checkup.
(C) Patients not medically trained are unable to judge foe themselves what degree of thoroughness is appropri-ate for physicians in conducting medical checkups.
(D) Many people are financially unable to afford regular medical checkups.
(E) Some physicians sometimes exercise exactly the right degree of thoroughness in performing a medical checkup.

2. Which one of the following, if true, would provide the most support for the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Not all medical tests entail significant discomfort.
(B) Sometimes unnecessary medical tests cause healthy people to become ill.
(C) Some patients refuse to accept a physician’s assurance that the patient is healthy.
(D) The more complete the series of tests performed in a medical checkup, the more likely it is that a rare dis-ease, if present, will be discovered.
(E) Physicians can eliminate the need to order certain tests by carefully questioning patients and rejecting some possibilities on that basis.

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 01:45

1) A
2) B (assuming that questioning patients is a part of medical checkup)

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 06:15
My ans are C & E
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 391

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: one who (2 logic questions) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 06:44
My answers are 1-E and 2-B

As per 1-E, if some physicians exactly the right degree of thoroughness in performing a medical checkup, then it makes sense for the patients to have medical checkups even if they donot feel ill. Thus, it clearly weakens the argument.

A - supports the (1st part of the) argument
B - 'time' makes it out of scope or vaguely supports (2nd part of the) argument and it is not affecting the argument in any way.
C - The argument does not talk about patient's judgement about physician's thoroughness. And the word 'training' makes it out of scope
D - Clearly out of scope as the argument is concerned about the finance.

As per 2-B, if ,sometimes, unnecessary medical tests cause healthy people to become ill, then it is better not to go for checkups if they donot feel ill.

A - vaguely supports but does not affect the conclusion much.
C - 'assurance' makes it out of scope.
D - Supports the first half of the argument than the conclusion.
E - Actually weakens the argument. Then the patients are already undergoing a 'kind of checkup'

stolyar wrote:
Questions 1â€”2
A physician who is too through in conducting a medical checkup is likely to subject the patient to the discomfort and expense of unnecessary tests. One who is not thorough enough is likely to miss some serious problem and therefore give the patient a false sense of security. It is difficult for physicians to judge exactly how thorough they should be. Therefore, it is generally unwise for patients to have medical checkups when they do not feel ill.

1. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument in the passage?

(A) Some serious diseases in their early stages have symptoms that physicians can readily detect.
(B) Under the pressure of reduced reimbursements, physicians have been reducing the average amount of time they spend on each medical checkup.
(C) Patients not medically trained are unable to judge foe themselves what degree of thoroughness is appropri-ate for physicians in conducting medical checkups.
(D) Many people are financially unable to afford regular medical checkups.
(E) Some physicians sometimes exercise exactly the right degree of thoroughness in performing a medical checkup.

2. Which one of the following, if true, would provide the most support for the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Not all medical tests entail significant discomfort.
(B) Sometimes unnecessary medical tests cause healthy people to become ill.
(C) Some patients refuse to accept a physicianâ€™s assurance that the patient is healthy.
(D) The more complete the series of tests performed in a medical checkup, the more likely it is that a rare dis-ease, if present, will be discovered.
(E) Physicians can eliminate the need to order certain tests by carefully questioning patients and rejecting some possibilities on that basis.

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 957

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 08:42
C and
E

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2003
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Location: Manhattan

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 10:29
1) conclusion states that we shouldn't visit doctors unless we get sick.

(A) Some serious diseases in their early stages have symptoms that physicians can readily detect.

Ability to prevent seriuos diseases from entering into a late stage is reason enough for us to visit doctors w/t being sick.

2)
(B) Sometimes unnecessary medical tests cause healthy people to become ill.
That's reason enough not to go to a doctor -- some of the tests run by some physicians who run too many unnecessary test may harm you!

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 14:51
1. A
2. B

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 19:19
A and B and agree with iatoshka's explanation
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 19:27
1- C would have been good if it did not talk about the "the patient's knowledge about the level of thoroughness that a physician should apply". That is clearly out of scope.
2- E --> conclusion says that patients should not see physicians. However, even though the doctor can eliminate certain tests by asking questions, does that support the effectiveness of any of the performed ones? E is out.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 957

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 20:10
ye, you are right, Paul. I was just thinking wayward.

Kudos [?]: 178 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 01:08
A and B are the official answers

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: Cary,NC
Re: one who (2 logic questions) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 13:30
stolyar wrote:
Questions 1â€”2
A physician who is too through in conducting a medical checkup is likely to subject the patient to the discomfort and expense of unnecessary tests. One who is not thorough enough is likely to miss some serious problem and therefore give the patient a false sense of security. It is difficult for physicians to judge exactly how thorough they should be. Therefore, it is generally unwise for patients to have medical checkups when they do not feel ill.

1. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument in the passage?

(A) Some serious diseases in their early stages have symptoms that physicians can readily detect.
(B) Under the pressure of reduced reimbursements, physicians have been reducing the average amount of time they spend on each medical checkup.
(C) Patients not medically trained are unable to judge foe themselves what degree of thoroughness is appropri-ate for physicians in conducting medical checkups.
(D) Many people are financially unable to afford regular medical checkups.
(E) Some physicians sometimes exercise exactly the right degree of thoroughness in performing a medical checkup.

2. Which one of the following, if true, would provide the most support for the conclusion in the passage?

(A) Not all medical tests entail significant discomfort.
(B) Sometimes unnecessary medical tests cause healthy people to become ill.
(C) Some patients refuse to accept a physicianâ€™s assurance that the patient is healthy.
(D) The more complete the series of tests performed in a medical checkup, the more likely it is that a rare dis-ease, if present, will be discovered.
(E) Physicians can eliminate the need to order certain tests by carefully questioning patients and rejecting some possibilities on that basis.

Can anyone explain how A is better than E in Q1.
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 13:48
E is just a very weak assertion. So what if some physicians sometimes exercise exactly the right degree of thoroughness? You still don't directly attack the claim that it's not worth to see doctors
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 19:22
Agree with Paul's explanation but "Some serious diseases" in A and "Sometimes" in B make me think.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Melbourne

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2004, 21:27
1C
2B
_________________

everyday is a new endeavor

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

16 Jul 2004, 21:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by