Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
20 Aug 2021, 08:51
Kudos
Bookmarks
Welcome to GMAT Club!
AWA Score: 4.5 out of 6!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 3.5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 2.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 3.5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 2.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
Click on the link below for the AWA guide
https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6 ... 64327.html
Click on the link below for the AWA forum rules (This is necessary)
https://gmatclub.com/forum/awa-forum-ru ... 64141.html
Good Luck
nimratgrewal
22 Sep 2021, 11:07
Kudos
Bookmarks
Would anyone mind to have look at mine please?
The assumption that Olympic Foods made to their stokholders in the latest report, that as time goes by they are able to minimize costs and increase profits, contains flaws that puts in risk the trust of the operations to their investors.
For example, it is inferred that time equals a good practice of knoledge management and investment in improvemetns, when they mention ¨ Overtime… organizations learn how to do things better.¨ but in reality there is no proof that this is the case for Olympic foods, shall there be an example of what processes they have improved compared to years back it would strenghthen the paragraph to indicate that they have a dedicated effort to update their standars resulting in tangilbe lower costs.
Second, although in principle the comparison between the film processing and the cold forzen food insdustry can be undestandable it does not represent the best comparison, as technology rapidly evolves it is wrong to assume that it does for all categories, therefore a 25th year gap between analogue film technology may not be the same as the advancements in the frozen food category.
Lastly, there is no records, proof or stadistics that the company has a dedicated department for proposing technological change or how flexible their leadership board is towards adopting new thecnologies that can reduce costs over time. There are also many ways to maximize profits that do not depend on techonolical redyness, perhaps closing branches, reducing prices, reconsider a economical restrucure, but time by itself is not a given.
Had the report provided solid examples of their holystic strategic decision making towards operational costs and increasing profits their statement would had been stronger towards maintiaing their stakeholders trust for the time to come.
The assumption that Olympic Foods made to their stokholders in the latest report, that as time goes by they are able to minimize costs and increase profits, contains flaws that puts in risk the trust of the operations to their investors.
For example, it is inferred that time equals a good practice of knoledge management and investment in improvemetns, when they mention ¨ Overtime… organizations learn how to do things better.¨ but in reality there is no proof that this is the case for Olympic foods, shall there be an example of what processes they have improved compared to years back it would strenghthen the paragraph to indicate that they have a dedicated effort to update their standars resulting in tangilbe lower costs.
Second, although in principle the comparison between the film processing and the cold forzen food insdustry can be undestandable it does not represent the best comparison, as technology rapidly evolves it is wrong to assume that it does for all categories, therefore a 25th year gap between analogue film technology may not be the same as the advancements in the frozen food category.
Lastly, there is no records, proof or stadistics that the company has a dedicated department for proposing technological change or how flexible their leadership board is towards adopting new thecnologies that can reduce costs over time. There are also many ways to maximize profits that do not depend on techonolical redyness, perhaps closing branches, reducing prices, reconsider a economical restrucure, but time by itself is not a given.
Had the report provided solid examples of their holystic strategic decision making towards operational costs and increasing profits their statement would had been stronger towards maintiaing their stakeholders trust for the time to come.
22 Sep 2021, 12:14
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 4.5 out of 6!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 4/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 3.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
I have used a GMATAWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.
Coherence and connectivity: 4/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 3.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
Good Luck
LuigiAguayo
