Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 14:04 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 14:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatt1476
Joined: 04 Sep 2017
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 374
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Posts: 374
Kudos: 25,733
 [186]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
175
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,849
Own Kudos:
8,235
 [49]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,849
Kudos: 8,235
 [49]
33
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,712
Own Kudos:
26,989
 [29]
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,712
Kudos: 26,989
 [29]
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Jsound996
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 11 Sep 2023
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
128
 [10]
Given Kudos: 3,158
Products:
Posts: 104
Kudos: 128
 [10]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01

The question is asking if the Interest earned at 2% > than the Interest earned at 2.5%
Let's say that:
Interest Earned at 2% = x
Interest Earned at 2.5 = Y

Here's my approach, which requires little math and more reasoning/logic:

1.) Interested Earned at 2.5% = $25
If the initial investment is $1, we would know that the interested earned from 2% would be greater than Interest earned from 2.5% ($25) X>Y
If the initial investment is $999, we would know that the interest earned from 2% would be smaller than the Interest earned from 2.5% ($25) Y>X
Insufficient

2.) Time = 3 years
We don't know the starting values, if the initial investment is $1, in three years X>Y. If the initial investment is $999, then Y>X. Insufficient

1) + 2)
We know that time is 3 years, and that the interest earned at 2.5% is $25. This basically "locks" in the value of Y with a specific amount of time, so then we can directly solve for how much of the 3 years was the investment under $1000, and hence X. Sufficient

C is the Answer!
User avatar
RK007
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Last visit: 27 Feb 2020
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
48
 [2]
Given Kudos: 222
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Posts: 65
Kudos: 48
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nick1816
Suppose initial Principal amount=P
Assume, after x days, balance would be 1000

\(P(1+\frac{2}{365})^x=1000\)......(1)

Assume account was opened for N days
Balance after N days= B

\(1000(1+\frac{2.5}{365})^{N-x}= B\).....(2)

We need to figure out Both P and B.

Statement 1
Statement 1 gives us the value of B. We can figure out N-x, but P is still unknown.

Statement 2-
Statement gives us the value of N, but both P and B are unknown

Combining both Statements
From statement 1
we have value of B and with the help of equation (2), we can find out N-x

From statement 2 we have value of N; Hence, we can find the value of x. With the help of equation 1, we can find P.

Sufficient







gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01
Hey nick1816,
Which formula have u used for the C.I. equation?
I remember 1 formula - C.I. = P(1 + (r/n))^(n*t)
Where - n- no. of times/ year
t - no. of years
r - rate
But what you've used isn't analogous to this one...
Please help me understand your formula...
Thanks in advance... :)
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,849
Own Kudos:
8,235
 [2]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,849
Kudos: 8,235
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Brother if you're considering interest rate annually, convert the duration in years.
if you're considering interest rate monthly, convert the duration in months.
if you're considering interest rate daily, convert the duration in days.

Why it works.
Consider interest rate annually=r
time duration in years= 0.5 years

A=\(P(1+r/100)^{0.5}\)= \(P(1+\frac{0.5r}{100}+(0.5)(-0.5)(\frac{r}{100})^2/2!..........)\)=P(1+r/200)
or
A=\(P(1+r/1200)^6\)= \(P(1+\frac{6r}{1200}+6*5(\frac{r}{1200})^2/2!.........)\)= P(1+r/200)

As r/100 is very small, higher power of r/100 is almost negligible. Hence, you can neglect 3rd and higher terms.



RK007
nick1816
Suppose initial Principal amount=P
Assume, after x days, balance would be 1000

\(P(1+\frac{2}{365})^x=1000\)......(1)

Assume account was opened for N days
Balance after N days= B

\(1000(1+\frac{2.5}{365})^{N-x}= B\).....(2)

We need to figure out Both P and B.

Statement 1
Statement 1 gives us the value of B. We can figure out N-x, but P is still unknown.

Statement 2-
Statement gives us the value of N, but both P and B are unknown

Combining both Statements
From statement 1
we have value of B and with the help of equation (2), we can find out N-x

From statement 2 we have value of N; Hence, we can find the value of x. With the help of equation 1, we can find P.

Sufficient







gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01
Hey nick1816,
Which formula have u used for the C.I. equation?
I remember 1 formula - C.I. = P(1 + (r/n))^(n*t)
Where - n- no. of times/ year
t - no. of years
r - rate
But what you've used isn't analogous to this one...
Please help me understand your formula...
Thanks in advance... :)
User avatar
eka9045
Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Last visit: 07 Dec 2023
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 37
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jsound996
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01

The question is asking if the Interest earned at 2% > than the Interest earned at 2.5%
Let's say that:
Interest Earned at 2% = x
Interest Earned at 2.5 = Y

Here's my approach, which requires little math and more reasoning/logic:

1.) Interested Earned at 2.5% = $25
If the initial investment is $1, we would know that the interested earned from 2% would be greater than Interest earned from 2.5% ($25) X>Y
If the initial investment is $999, we would know that the interest earned from 2% would be smaller than the Interest earned from 2.5% ($25) Y>X
Insufficient

2.) Time = 3 years
We don't know the starting values, if the initial investment is $1, in three years X>Y. If the initial investment is $999, then Y>X. Insufficient

1) + 2)
We know that time is 3 years, and that the interest earned at 2.5% is $25. This basically "locks" in the value of Y with a specific amount of time, so then we can directly solve for how much of the 3 years was the investment under $1000, and hence X. Sufficient

C is the Answer!

Hey can you please help me understand your approach once again?
As per Statement 1, the account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate, how are we evaluating this value in context of 3 years? isn't this value primarily for 1 year? I think I am not able to understand this question.
Thanks.
User avatar
itspC
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Last visit: 04 Oct 2025
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
866
 [7]
Given Kudos: 108
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41 (Online)
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41 (Online)
Posts: 73
Kudos: 866
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
eka9045
jsound996
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01

The question is asking if the Interest earned at 2% > than the Interest earned at 2.5%
Let's say that:
Interest Earned at 2% = x
Interest Earned at 2.5 = Y

Here's my approach, which requires little math and more reasoning/logic:

1.) Interested Earned at 2.5% = $25
If the initial investment is $1, we would know that the interested earned from 2% would be greater than Interest earned from 2.5% ($25) X>Y
If the initial investment is $999, we would know that the interest earned from 2% would be smaller than the Interest earned from 2.5% ($25) Y>X
Insufficient

2.) Time = 3 years
We don't know the starting values, if the initial investment is $1, in three years X>Y. If the initial investment is $999, then Y>X. Insufficient

1) + 2)
We know that time is 3 years, and that the interest earned at 2.5% is $25. This basically "locks" in the value of Y with a specific amount of time, so then we can directly solve for how much of the 3 years was the investment under $1000, and hence X. Sufficient

C is the Answer!

Hey can you please help me understand your approach once again?
As per Statement 1, the account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate, how are we evaluating this value in context of 3 years? isn't this value primarily for 1 year? I think I am not able to understand this question.
Thanks.

Hi, this question basically is pretty simple as the value isn't asked. so this makes our work easy.
clearly each alone isn't sufficient.

Let's see the formula for C.I.=P[(1+r/n)^nt -1] (the -1 is for finding interest)

so now for

1) C.I=1000[((1+2.5/365*100)^365*t)-1]=25
from this equation we can somehow find the value of t in terms of a fraction which converts into days. i.e, days for which the 2.5% interest is calculated.

now from

2) 3 years minus t found from (1) gives no.of years at 2% interest. (Say T)
this converts the known equation: 1000=P(1+2/365*100)^365T.

where T = 3-t.

now on solving you can find the interest required and do the remaining. Thus its option(C)

HOPE THIS HELPS YOU SOLVE YOUR CONFUSION. HIT KUDOS IF YOU UNDERSTOOD.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,980
 [13]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,980
 [13]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01

This is what we know about compounding:

\(Amount = P(1 + \frac{r}{100})^n\)

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.

So \(1025 = 1000(1 + \frac{2.5}{365*100})^{365n}\)
We can get the value of n i.e. the number of years for which 2.5% rate was applicable.
But we don't know how long the account earned 2% interest so not sufficient alone.

(2) The account was open for exactly three years.
We don't know how long each interest rate was applicable. Not sufficient.

Both together,
We know the number of years the 2.5% rate was applicable. We also know that total for 3 years the account was open. So 2% rate was applicable for (3 - n) years which we get because we know n.

\(1000 = P(1 + \frac{2}{365*100})^{365(3-n)}\)
Since we know n, we can get P and hence we know the exact interest amount earned at 2% too. This can help us compare the interest amounts on the two rates. Sufficient.

Answer (C)


Method 2:

Here is a reasoning based solution:
User avatar
Saupayan
Joined: 30 May 2013
Last visit: 23 May 2025
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
137
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Status:Full-time employee
Affiliations: Apple Inc
Location: United States
Saupayan: Mazumdar
Concentration: Economics, Leadership
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
GRE 1: Q170 V160
GPA: 3.89
WE:Engineering (Computer Hardware)
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
GRE 1: Q170 V160
Posts: 108
Kudos: 137
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ScottTargetTestPrep
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01
Solution:

Statement One Only:

The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.

Since we don’t know the original amount deposited in the account, i.e., the principal, we can’t determine whether the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate is greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate. For example, if the principal is $970, then the interest earned at 2% will be $30, which is greater than the $25 interest earned at the 2.5% rate. However, if the principal is $980, then the interest earned at 2% will be $20, which is less than the $25 interest earned at the 2.5% rate.

Statement Two Only:
The account was open for exactly three years.

Since we don’t know the length of time it takes the principal to reach the $1000 benchmark, we can’t determine whether the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate is greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate. For example, if it takes 2 years for the principal to reach $1000, then certainly the interest earned at 2% (during the first 2 years) will be greater than the $25 interest earned at the 2.5% rate (during the last year). However, if it takes 1 year for the principal to reach $1000, then certainly the interest earned at 2% (during the first year) will be less than the $25 interest earned at the 2.5% rate (during the last 2 years).

Statements One and Two Together:

Using statement one, we can calculate the time necessary to earn an interest of $25 from a principal of $1,000 at 2.5% compounded daily. Using statement two, we can subtract the time we calculated in the previous step from three years to determine the amount of time the principal acquired interest at the 2% rate. Since we know the account was worth $1,000 at the end of this time, we can calculate the principal and the interest earned in this period. Finally, we can compare this interest to $25 and determine whether the account acquired more interest in the 2% period or the 2.5% period.

Recall that in a DS question, we only need to determine whether we have enough information to answer the question; we don’t have to perform the steps and find the actual answer. As we can see from above, statement one and statement two together provide sufficient information to answer the question.

Answer: C

I used the same method as you did, and got the "right" answer. But I wasn't convinced because I (and you) am making an assumption here (the highlighted text above). How do we know that the starting balance for the 2nd period is 1000$ exactly? It could be 1000.01 or 1000.1 (you get my point). Because we are told that compounded happens daily and the daily could take it from just below 1000$ to just above 1000$. Of course, we are simplifying here, and in this case, it leads us to the right answer. But will it always? Why is it OK to ignore this rounding error?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,980
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01

Saupayan Kavicogsci

Here is the video solution: https://youtu.be/PH_C7FsqLNU

Look at the question holistically - big picture. Those tiny approximations are irrelevant here and so are formulas and calculations.

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.

Starting at about $1000, we earned $25 at 2.5% compounded daily. $25 is 2.5% of $1000 which we would earn in a year without compounding.

At very low interest rates, compounding effect takes a long time. In any case, it would take slightly less than 1 year to get $25. So for slightly more than 2 years out of the total 3 years, the interest was being earned at 2% at least (compounding would make it a tad higher). Since we reached $1000 through 2% interest, we earned approximately $20 + $20 (i.e. we started with around $960)

So total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate (about $40) was greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate ($25)

Answer (C)
User avatar
Harshita2003
Joined: 08 Jul 2021
Last visit: 07 Nov 2025
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
GPA: 8.3
WE:Analyst (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 42
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This really doesn't feel like a 655-705 question. But regardless of that, I think one of the most important things to do is to not get swept away by the complexities like the decimals or "compounded daily" stuff and really just get into the basics. I got this question wrong because I really panicked seeing compounded daily :(
gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.


DS29931.01
User avatar
Emily1122
Joined: 25 Mar 2020
Last visit: 25 Sep 2025
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Products:
Posts: 26
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is very confusing, how do we know if the this balance earn 2% interest is not like $1?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,061
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Emily1122
This is very confusing, how do we know if the this balance earn 2% interest is not like $1?
If the starting balance had been something tiny like $1, it would take far longer than 3 years for the account to ever reach $1,000 at just 2% compounded daily. Statement (2) fixes the total time as 3 years, and statement (1) tells us the account actually did reach $1,000 and then earn exactly $25 at the 2.5% rate.

That $25 is basically what you get in about 1 year at 2.5% of $1,000. So the account must have spent roughly 2 years at the 2% rate before hitting $1,000. This means the starting balance had to be close to $960, not $1.

So the “what if it started at $1?” scenario isn’t possible under the given conditions.

gmatt1476
A bank account earned 2% annual interest, compounded daily, for as long as the balance was under $1,000, starting when the account was opened. Once the balance reached $1,000, the account earned 2.5% annual interest, compounded daily until the account was closed. No deposits or withdrawals were made. Was the total amount of interest earned at the 2% rate greater than the total amount earned at the 2.5% rate?

(1) The account earned exactly $25 in interest at the 2.5% rate.
(2) The account was open for exactly three years.

The compounding of these very small percentages over a short time doesn’t change the effective rate much. So 2.5% compounded daily over one year would be a little bit more than 2.5% (actually, approximately 2.53%). And 2% compounded daily over one year would give an effective rate a little bit more than 2% (actually, approximately 2.02%). So the compounding bit can be ignored in this question and we can just imagine that we have a simple interest. Statement (1) tells us that $25 interest at 2.5% corresponds to about one year, which leaves about two years at 2%. That means the initial account should have been about $960, which at 2% would give approximately $1,000. So the interest is $40, which is more than $25.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts