Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated to

Question

Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated to the periphery of the American canon. Jon A. Lauck, in his book From Warm Center to Ragged Edge, attributes this marginalization to a statement of literary critic Carl Van Doren published in The Nation in 1921, during a period when the hierarchies of aesthetic and social values to be embodied by the canon were first delineated. Van Doren described the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States as that which could be characterized as a "revolt from the village." He celebrated authors who portrayed local life as stifling rather than satisfying and considered them artistic innovators and political visionaries. Lauck argues that Van Doren and other Eastern critics not only completely ignored Midwestern writers whose work deviated from this pattern but also substantially misunderstood the work of the writers who had been assigned to the "revolt" school, resulting in the exclusion of most Midwestern works from the "rootless, urban, elite version of American literature that persists to this day." Although she finds Lauck's omission of a definition of "the Midwest" troubling, Stephanie Foote considers his book "a triumph of research . . . and a compelling narrative" that provokes the reader to "take seriously the debates about which cultures are valued and which are not."

Consider each of the following choices separately and select all that apply.

Which of the following statements about the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school can be inferred from the passage?

(I) Jon Lauck believes that some of the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school were misread by Eastern critics.
(II) When the American canon of literature was first discussed, some critics considered the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school the most important literature from that region.
(III) Stephanie Foote finds Lauck's omission of a definition of "the Midwest" sufficient to dismiss his assessment of the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. III Only
D. II and III only
E. I,II,and III

Which of the following statements about the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school can be inferred from the passage?

(I) Jon Lauck believes that some of the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school were misread by Eastern critics.
(II) When the American canon of literature was first discussed, some critics considered the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school the most important literature from that region.
(III) Stephanie Foote finds Lauck's omission of a definition of "the Midwest" sufficient to dismiss his assessment of the works of Midwestern literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. III Only
D. II and III only
E. I,II,and III

sachbash14 · Answer

Wondering why this is (B) and not (A)? 
I see why I. applies, but I am struggling with II. 
TYIA

Carcass · Answer

Van Doren described the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States as that which could be characterized as a "revolt from the village." He celebrated authors who portrayed local life as stifling rather than satisfying and considered them artistic innovators and political visionaries.

From this we infer the II

sachbash14

Wondering why this is (B) and not (A)?
I see why I. applies, but I am struggling with II.
TYIA

From this we infer the II

Carcass · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

B

(I) is supported by Lauck's opinion expressed in the fifth sentence and is correct. If the works were "misunderstood," then they were "misread." (II) is also correct. This choice is supported by the third sentence, where it's said that Van Doren, one of the critics responsible for the discussions that led to the formation of the American canon of literature, called these works "the most interesting literature from the middle of the United States." Since a canon of literature is a list of the most important or influential books, and since Van Doren's comment is cited in reference to the creation of the American canon, it is inferred that "Van Doren and other Eastern critics" thought the works of the "revolt" school were the most important literature from the Midwestern United States. (III) is not supported by the text. While Foote does criticize Lauck's omission of a crucial definition, she also considers Lauck's book "a triumph of research" and so likely supports his assessment of these works. Her criticism is directed toward an issue that is peripheral to the literature assigned to the "revolt from the village" school.

shubhim20 · Answer

didn't get how II is correct?

PSKhore · Answer

But how is interesting equivalent to important?
I rejected II because of this reasoning

Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated to

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Literature from the Midwestern United States is often relegated to

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards