Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 05:59 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 05:59

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 466
Own Kudos [?]: 3903 [197]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 1150
Own Kudos [?]: 1737 [72]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6821
Own Kudos [?]: 29902 [41]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Posts: 241
Own Kudos [?]: 372 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
I think answer should be C.

From stem:
M-J = 2(M-K)
M-J = 2M-2K
M = 2K-J

what's M+J+K/3?

1) J = 30
M = 2K-30, insuff.

2) K = 40
M = 80-J, insuff.

1&2)
M = 80-30 = 50, suff.[/code]
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 697
Own Kudos [?]: 535 [4]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
im with B.

You can create an equation from stem of m-j=2(m-k), and you are looking for m+j+k/3

If you expand and plug in, you will see that average is just k, i.e. kates salary. B gives you this info
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 617
Own Kudos [?]: 2900 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
2
Kudos
ryguy904 wrote:
Data Sufficiency:

In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salary was twice the difference between Mary's and Kate's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salary is the highest of the three people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people last year?

1) Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year
2) Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year.


Clearly IMO B

consider the given condition=>say mary's sal =m,ken's=k,jim's=j
then given that => m-j = 2(m-k) =>m+j=2k
now consider Question :( m+j+k) /3 =? that is
3k/3=k =? hence knowig k is sufficient to answr but knowing j is not suffi.hence (1) is not suffi and (2) is sufficient
hence IMO B
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Posts: 972
Own Kudos [?]: 4927 [18]
Given Kudos: 690
Concentration: Accounting
Send PM
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
10
Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Given that,

\(M-J =2(M-K)\)

\(=>M-J =2M-2K\)

\(=>2K=2M-M+J\)

\(=>2K=M+J\)

Average of the three \(= \frac{(M+J+K)}{3}\)

Substituting M+J =2K

Then the average \(=\frac{2K+K}{3} =K\)

So K's salary is the average of the three.

Statement 1: gives J's salary. We need even K's salary to find the average. So insufficient

Statement 2: directly gives Kates's annual salary. Hence that is the average.

Sufficient

The answer is \(B\)

Originally posted by MHIKER on 21 Dec 2011, 11:37.
Last edited by MHIKER on 27 Dec 2020, 12:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 68
Own Kudos [?]: 410 [11]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.2
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
5
Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Let me try too clarify this one for you.

Let Mary's, Jim's and Kate's salaries be M,J and K respectively.
The question states that

(M-J)=2(M-K). This implies that -J=M-2K ==>M+J=2K
We also know that Mary's salary was the highest among the three people.
We need to find (M+K+J)/3=3K/3=K
Hence, all we need is Kate's Salary.

Now let us consider statement 1. It tells is about Jim's salary. However, we still do not know the difference between Mary's and Jim's salaries or Mary's salary. So, we cannot go further with this calculations.
INSUFFICIENT

Let us consider statement 2.
This gives us exactly what we want, so this is SUFFICIENT.

Hence, answer is B.
Hope this helped!

fozzzy wrote:
How do you solve this one? what's the answer?
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1345
Own Kudos [?]: 2391 [0]
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
alimad wrote:
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salaries was twice the difference between Mary's and Kat's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salry was the highest of the 3 people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people that year?

Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year
Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year


M + J + K / 3 = ?

Statement I

M - 30,000 = 2(M-K) - Plug in Numbers

50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 - 40000)
20,000 = 200000

50+30 + 40 = 120/3 = 40,000

60,000 - 30,000 = 2 (60,000 - 45,000)
30,000 = 30,000

60+30 + 45 = 135 /3 = 4..... - insufficient

Statement II

M - J = 2 (M - 40,000)

Plug Numbers
50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 = 40,000)
50 + 40 + 30 = 120 /3 = 40 average

60,000 - 20,000 = 2( 60,000 - 40,000)
40,000 = 40,000

60 + 20 + 40 = 120/3 = 40 average --- Answer is B

This approach takes a long time. Please provide an alternative solution. Thanks


Woah, slow down there killer. Thats too much work!

equation from stem: M-J=2(M-K) --> M-K=2M-2K --> M=2K-J

We want to know (M+J+K)/3

2K-J+J+K --> 3K/3 --> K is the average. If we know K then Suff.

So B is the answer.

Make sure to double check though to see if we can't get any others similar to 3K/3. ex/ maybe we can get 3J/3 or 4J/3 and so on... turns out we can't.


I think your rationale is good, however just wanted to know something.
When they mention the difference between Mark, Jane, etc. Don't we need to put it in Absolute Value?

Cheers
J
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618727 [3]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
jlgdr wrote:
GMATBLACKBELT wrote:
alimad wrote:
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salaries was twice the difference between Mary's and Kat's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salry was the highest of the 3 people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people that year?

Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year
Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year


M + J + K / 3 = ?

Statement I

M - 30,000 = 2(M-K) - Plug in Numbers

50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 - 40000)
20,000 = 200000

50+30 + 40 = 120/3 = 40,000

60,000 - 30,000 = 2 (60,000 - 45,000)
30,000 = 30,000

60+30 + 45 = 135 /3 = 4..... - insufficient

Statement II

M - J = 2 (M - 40,000)

Plug Numbers
50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 = 40,000)
50 + 40 + 30 = 120 /3 = 40 average

60,000 - 20,000 = 2( 60,000 - 40,000)
40,000 = 40,000

60 + 20 + 40 = 120/3 = 40 average --- Answer is B

This approach takes a long time. Please provide an alternative solution. Thanks


Woah, slow down there killer. Thats too much work!

equation from stem: M-J=2(M-K) --> M-K=2M-2K --> M=2K-J

We want to know (M+J+K)/3

2K-J+J+K --> 3K/3 --> K is the average. If we know K then Suff.

So B is the answer.

Make sure to double check though to see if we can't get any others similar to 3K/3. ex/ maybe we can get 3J/3 or 4J/3 and so on... turns out we can't.


I think your rationale is good, however just wanted to know something.
When they mention the difference between Mark, Jane, etc. Don't we need to put it in Absolute Value?

Cheers
J


Notice that we are told that "Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people", thus |M-J|=M-J and |M-K|=M-k, so no need of modulus here.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 137
Own Kudos [?]: 494 [0]
Given Kudos: 2412
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 5: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:

Notice that we are told that "Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people", thus |M-J|=M-J and |M-K|=M-k, so no need of modulus here.


Okay, I as wondering how that statement was helpful.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 65 [3]
Given Kudos: 12
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Deleted

Originally posted by ShannonWong on 16 May 2014, 03:47.
Last edited by ShannonWong on 25 Oct 2021, 03:26, edited 1 time in total.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618727 [5]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
1
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
ShannonWong wrote:
We don't need to use algebra for this right?

We know that:
A) the order is Mary --> Kate --> Jim
B) the difference between Mary and Kate is twice the difference between Mary and Jim - this is an arithmetic progression with 3 integers.

For statements:
1) We know Jim's annual salary but not the difference - meaning we do not know Kate or Mary's annual salary. We cannot find the average. (not sufficient)

2) We know Kate's annual salary. For an arithmetic progression of an odd number of integers, the average is the the middle integer. Kate's salary is the average. (sufficient)

What do you think?

Bunuel wrote:
Notice that we are told that "Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people", thus |M-J|=M-J and |M-K|=M-k, so no need of modulus here.


Yes, your approach is correct.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [4]
Given Kudos: 46
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
4
Kudos
My approach was as follows:

Kate = k
Jim = j
Mary = m

From the stem we can create the following equation:
m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

What we need to find is:

(m + j + k) / 3

Statement 1 gives us only j, which is clearly insufficient

Statement 2 gives us k = 40. So we can solve our equation:
2k = 80 => m + j = 80

So, (m + j + k) / 3 = (40 + 80) / 3 = 40. Sufficient.
ANSWER B.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618727 [0]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
Expert Reply
AnthonySS wrote:
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.


How do you get this ratio?

m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

We cannot get the ratio m:k:j from 2k = m + j.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
AnthonySS wrote:
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.


How do you get this ratio?

m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

We cannot get the ratio m:k:j from 2k = m + j.



---------------------------------------------------------------------

My apologies. I meant that 'M:K:J = 3a:2a:1a', therefore M-J=2a and M-K=a. The difference is twice.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92901
Own Kudos [?]: 618727 [0]
Given Kudos: 81586
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
Expert Reply
AnthonySS wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
AnthonySS wrote:
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.


How do you get this ratio?

m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

We cannot get the ratio m:k:j from 2k = m + j.



---------------------------------------------------------------------

My apologies. I meant that 'M:K:J = 3a:2a:1a', therefore M-J=2a and M-K=a. The difference is twice.


Again, from 2k = m + j we cannot get the ratio. It's not necessary the ratio to be 3:2:1.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
1
Kudos
With DS problems, I like to start by figuring out as much info as possible from the prompt. So, we know that
M-J=2(M-K) which we can simplify to M=2K-J

(because we know that Mary has the highest salary. We also know that M>K>J because the difference between mary and jim is bigger

We are looking for the average, so if we can figure out the sum (M+J+K), which we can substitute in the new M and get 2K-J+K+J, or 3K
so basically, all we need is J and we know the average.

(I) tells us that J=30,000, which doesn't really help us
(II) gives us K, which is 40,000, so we know the sum is 120,000 and the average is 40,000
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salaries was twice the difference between Mary's and Kate's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people that year7

(1) Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year.
(2) Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year.

Hi Bunuel,
I am also getting A as suff.

M-J=2(M-K)
Thus,K=2J
Now M-J-2(M-K)
Substitute K=2J
WE GET 3J=M
So M+J+K/3=3J+J+2J/3
2J=This is average,and we are given J,so suff
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual sala [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
92901 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne