Last visit was: 18 Jan 2025, 06:17 It is currently 18 Jan 2025, 06:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
alimad
Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 466
Own Kudos:
4,106
 [206]
Posts: 466
Kudos: 4,106
 [206]
20
Kudos
Add Kudos
186
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Last visit: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 1,141
Own Kudos:
1,798
 [75]
Posts: 1,141
Kudos: 1,798
 [75]
55
Kudos
Add Kudos
18
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,784
Own Kudos:
32,516
 [42]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert reply
Posts: 6,784
Kudos: 32,516
 [42]
19
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
asdert
Joined: 09 Oct 2007
Last visit: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
376
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 241
Kudos: 376
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think answer should be C.

From stem:
M-J = 2(M-K)
M-J = 2M-2K
M = 2K-J

what's M+J+K/3?

1) J = 30
M = 2K-30, insuff.

2) K = 40
M = 80-J, insuff.

1&2)
M = 80-30 = 50, suff.[/code]
avatar
pmenon
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Last visit: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 693
Own Kudos:
585
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 693
Kudos: 585
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
im with B.

You can create an equation from stem of m-j=2(m-k), and you are looking for m+j+k/3

If you expand and plug in, you will see that average is just k, i.e. kates salary. B gives you this info
User avatar
spriya
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 617
Own Kudos:
2,989
 [2]
Posts: 617
Kudos: 2,989
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ryguy904
Data Sufficiency:

In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salary was twice the difference between Mary's and Kate's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salary is the highest of the three people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people last year?

1) Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year
2) Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year.

Clearly IMO B

consider the given condition=>say mary's sal =m,ken's=k,jim's=j
then given that => m-j = 2(m-k) =>m+j=2k
now consider Question :( m+j+k) /3 =? that is
3k/3=k =? hence knowig k is sufficient to answr but knowing j is not suffi.hence (1) is not suffi and (2) is sufficient
hence IMO B
User avatar
MHIKER
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 950
Own Kudos:
5,255
 [18]
Given Kudos: 690
Status:No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Concentration: Accounting
Posts: 950
Kudos: 5,255
 [18]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given that,

\(M-J =2(M-K)\)

\(=>M-J =2M-2K\)

\(=>2K=2M-M+J\)

\(=>2K=M+J\)

Average of the three \(= \frac{(M+J+K)}{3}\)

Substituting M+J =2K

Then the average \(=\frac{2K+K}{3} =K\)

So K's salary is the average of the three.

Statement 1: gives J's salary. We need even K's salary to find the average. So insufficient

Statement 2: directly gives Kates's annual salary. Hence that is the average.

Sufficient

The answer is \(B\)
User avatar
Kris01
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Last visit: 14 Apr 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
427
 [11]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.2
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 67
Kudos: 427
 [11]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let me try too clarify this one for you.

Let Mary's, Jim's and Kate's salaries be M,J and K respectively.
The question states that

(M-J)=2(M-K). This implies that -J=M-2K ==>M+J=2K
We also know that Mary's salary was the highest among the three people.
We need to find (M+K+J)/3=3K/3=K
Hence, all we need is Kate's Salary.

Now let us consider statement 1. It tells is about Jim's salary. However, we still do not know the difference between Mary's and Jim's salaries or Mary's salary. So, we cannot go further with this calculations.
INSUFFICIENT

Let us consider statement 2.
This gives us exactly what we want, so this is SUFFICIENT.

Hence, answer is B.
Hope this helped!

fozzzy
How do you solve this one? what's the answer?
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,327
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,327
Kudos: 2,590
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATBLACKBELT
alimad
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salaries was twice the difference between Mary's and Kat's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salry was the highest of the 3 people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people that year?

Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year
Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year


M + J + K / 3 = ?

Statement I

M - 30,000 = 2(M-K) - Plug in Numbers

50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 - 40000)
20,000 = 200000

50+30 + 40 = 120/3 = 40,000

60,000 - 30,000 = 2 (60,000 - 45,000)
30,000 = 30,000

60+30 + 45 = 135 /3 = 4..... - insufficient

Statement II

M - J = 2 (M - 40,000)

Plug Numbers
50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 = 40,000)
50 + 40 + 30 = 120 /3 = 40 average

60,000 - 20,000 = 2( 60,000 - 40,000)
40,000 = 40,000

60 + 20 + 40 = 120/3 = 40 average --- Answer is B

This approach takes a long time. Please provide an alternative solution. Thanks


Woah, slow down there killer. Thats too much work!

equation from stem: M-J=2(M-K) --> M-K=2M-2K --> M=2K-J

We want to know (M+J+K)/3

2K-J+J+K --> 3K/3 --> K is the average. If we know K then Suff.

So B is the answer.

Make sure to double check though to see if we can't get any others similar to 3K/3. ex/ maybe we can get 3J/3 or 4J/3 and so on... turns out we can't.

I think your rationale is good, however just wanted to know something.
When they mention the difference between Mark, Jane, etc. Don't we need to put it in Absolute Value?

Cheers
J
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,773
Own Kudos:
694,744
 [3]
Given Kudos: 91,822
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,773
Kudos: 694,744
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jlgdr
GMATBLACKBELT
alimad
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salaries was twice the difference between Mary's and Kat's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salry was the highest of the 3 people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people that year?

Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year
Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year


M + J + K / 3 = ?

Statement I

M - 30,000 = 2(M-K) - Plug in Numbers

50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 - 40000)
20,000 = 200000

50+30 + 40 = 120/3 = 40,000

60,000 - 30,000 = 2 (60,000 - 45,000)
30,000 = 30,000

60+30 + 45 = 135 /3 = 4..... - insufficient

Statement II

M - J = 2 (M - 40,000)

Plug Numbers
50,000 - 30,000 = 2 (50,000 = 40,000)
50 + 40 + 30 = 120 /3 = 40 average

60,000 - 20,000 = 2( 60,000 - 40,000)
40,000 = 40,000

60 + 20 + 40 = 120/3 = 40 average --- Answer is B

This approach takes a long time. Please provide an alternative solution. Thanks


Woah, slow down there killer. Thats too much work!

equation from stem: M-J=2(M-K) --> M-K=2M-2K --> M=2K-J

We want to know (M+J+K)/3

2K-J+J+K --> 3K/3 --> K is the average. If we know K then Suff.

So B is the answer.

Make sure to double check though to see if we can't get any others similar to 3K/3. ex/ maybe we can get 3J/3 or 4J/3 and so on... turns out we can't.

I think your rationale is good, however just wanted to know something.
When they mention the difference between Mark, Jane, etc. Don't we need to put it in Absolute Value?

Cheers
J

Notice that we are told that "Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people", thus |M-J|=M-J and |M-K|=M-k, so no need of modulus here.
User avatar
TooLong150
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Last visit: 07 Feb 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,412
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V28
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GMAT 5: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Products:
GMAT 6: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 135
Kudos: 506
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Notice that we are told that "Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people", thus |M-J|=M-J and |M-K|=M-k, so no need of modulus here.

Okay, I as wondering how that statement was helpful.
avatar
ShannonWong
Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Last visit: 25 Oct 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
65
 [3]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 23
Kudos: 65
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deleted
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,773
Own Kudos:
694,744
 [5]
Given Kudos: 91,822
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,773
Kudos: 694,744
 [5]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ShannonWong
We don't need to use algebra for this right?

We know that:
A) the order is Mary --> Kate --> Jim
B) the difference between Mary and Kate is twice the difference between Mary and Jim - this is an arithmetic progression with 3 integers.

For statements:
1) We know Jim's annual salary but not the difference - meaning we do not know Kate or Mary's annual salary. We cannot find the average. (not sufficient)

2) We know Kate's annual salary. For an arithmetic progression of an odd number of integers, the average is the the middle integer. Kate's salary is the average. (sufficient)

What do you think?

Bunuel
Notice that we are told that "Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people", thus |M-J|=M-J and |M-K|=M-k, so no need of modulus here.

Yes, your approach is correct.
User avatar
Maksym
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
97
 [5]
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 16
Kudos: 97
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My approach was as follows:

Kate = k
Jim = j
Mary = m

From the stem we can create the following equation:
m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

What we need to find is:

(m + j + k) / 3

Statement 1 gives us only j, which is clearly insufficient

Statement 2 gives us k = 40. So we can solve our equation:
2k = 80 => m + j = 80

So, (m + j + k) / 3 = (40 + 80) / 3 = 40. Sufficient.
ANSWER B.
avatar
AnthonySS
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Last visit: 11 Sep 2021
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,773
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91,822
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,773
Kudos: 694,744
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnthonySS
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.

How do you get this ratio?

m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

We cannot get the ratio m:k:j from 2k = m + j.
avatar
AnthonySS
Joined: 14 Sep 2014
Last visit: 11 Sep 2021
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
AnthonySS
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.

How do you get this ratio?

m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

We cannot get the ratio m:k:j from 2k = m + j.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

My apologies. I meant that 'M:K:J = 3a:2a:1a', therefore M-J=2a and M-K=a. The difference is twice.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 98,773
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91,822
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 98,773
Kudos: 694,744
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnthonySS
Bunuel
AnthonySS
I agree of all your opinion.
But how do you think about my approach?

We can think that the ratio of Mary:Kate:Jim is 5a:4a:1a, because the difference of Mary and Jim is twice of that of Mary and Kate.
Then the answer could be 'D'.

How do you get this ratio?

m - j = 2 (m -k)
m - j = 2m - 2k
2k = m + j

We cannot get the ratio m:k:j from 2k = m + j.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

My apologies. I meant that 'M:K:J = 3a:2a:1a', therefore M-J=2a and M-K=a. The difference is twice.

Again, from 2k = m + j we cannot get the ratio. It's not necessary the ratio to be 3:2:1.
User avatar
elizaanne
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Last visit: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
86
 [1]
Posts: 32
Kudos: 86
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
With DS problems, I like to start by figuring out as much info as possible from the prompt. So, we know that
M-J=2(M-K) which we can simplify to M=2K-J

(because we know that Mary has the highest salary. We also know that M>K>J because the difference between mary and jim is bigger

We are looking for the average, so if we can figure out the sum (M+J+K), which we can substitute in the new M and get 2K-J+K+J, or 3K
so basically, all we need is J and we know the average.

(I) tells us that J=30,000, which doesn't really help us
(II) gives us K, which is 40,000, so we know the sum is 120,000 and the average is 40,000
avatar
ssriva2
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2015
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 96
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a certain year, the difference between Mary's and Jim's annual salaries was twice the difference between Mary's and Kate's annual salaries. If Mary's annual salary was the highest of the 3 people, what was the average (arithmetic mean) annual salary of the 3 people that year7

(1) Jim's annual salary was $30,000 that year.
(2) Kate's annual salary was $40,000 that year.

Hi Bunuel,
I am also getting A as suff.

M-J=2(M-K)
Thus,K=2J
Now M-J-2(M-K)
Substitute K=2J
WE GET 3J=M
So M+J+K/3=3J+J+2J/3
2J=This is average,and we are given J,so suff
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
98773 posts