Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:15 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
cfc198
User avatar
CAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 12 Apr 2020
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
801
 [6]
Given Kudos: 50
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Posts: 261
Kudos: 801
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NISHA098
Joined: 15 Apr 2025
Last visit: 27 Sep 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
napolean92728
User avatar
CAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Oct 2024
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 282
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 228
Status:Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.
Posts: 282
Kudos: 83
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
napolean92728
User avatar
CAT Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Oct 2024
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 282
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 228
Status:Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.
Posts: 282
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NISHA098
could you explain why option 4 is correct?
Correct Answer: (4) Defenders of the global economic status quo are posing as climate change champions.
This option most appropriately completes the paragraph by:
  • Connecting climate change rhetoric to protectionism (as mentioned earlier in the paragraph).
  • Implying hypocrisy: those defending the status quo are using climate change as a cover.
  • Fitting the tone of the paragraph, which is critical of industrialized countries' hidden motives.
It adds a conclusive layer of insight — the idea that climate activism is a guise for economic self-interest, which aligns with the paragraph's core argument.

Elimination of Other Options:
(1) "Climate change is evoked to bring trade protectionism through the back door."
  • Too literal and repetitive — the paragraph already implies this.
  • It doesn't add new insight or wrap up the idea effectively.
  • Sounds like a rewording of the earlier sentence, not a completion.

(2) "OECD countries are taking refuge in climate change issues to erect trade barriers against these two countries."
  • Too specific (China and India) when the paragraph's larger point is broader.
  • The paragraph mentions China and India, but the focus is on the strategy of OECD countries.
  • Not as elegant or general a conclusion as (4).

(3) "Climate change concerns have come as a convenient stick to beat the rising trade power of China and India."
  • Again, over-focus on China and India.
  • While this echoes the paragraph's content, it narrows the focus, whereas the paragraph is making a broader geopolitical-economic argument.
  • Also, "stick to beat" is a bit colloquial, not in tone with the rest of the paragraph.

(5) "Today’s climate change champions are the perpetrators of global economic inequity."
  • Slightly too accusatory and moralistic in tone.
  • "Perpetrators of global economic inequity" is a strong claim that shifts the focus toward inequality, not protectionism.
  • It deviates from the main theme of trade tactics disguised as climate concern.
Moderator:
CAT Forum Moderator
282 posts