vitorpteixeira
Hello Experts,
I am still not one hundred percent sure about this topic.
As we known Parallel clauses must begin with the same word, but there is one example on Manhattan 5th edition which is making me crazy about this topic. In which it said "The subordinators do not have to be identical". and shows the sentence below.
There are many people WHO speak english but WHOSE parents do not.
How can the subordinators do not have to be identical and the parallel clauses must begin with the same words?
Hi vitorpteixeira, it would be very
limiting to follow this as a
rule that parallel clauses
must begin with the same word.
In this regard, you might also want to read a
post I had made earlier.
Following is a similar officially correct sentence:
Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living, but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status.
Again, notice that one clause begins with
who while the other with
whose.
Hence, rather than looking for the same
word, our book
EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana recommends the following approach:
i) Always look to the
RHS of the
parallelism indicator. In this case, the parallelism indicator is
but and RHS is a
dependent clause (
whose reputation....).
ii)
LHS of the parallelism indicator must have similar structure (in this case,
dependent clause). In this case, since LHS
does have the same structure (
who receives...), the sentence is
correct from a parallelism perspective.
p.s. Our book
EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses
this parallelism approach, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.