Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
43%
(00:46)
correct 57%
(01:26)
wrong
based on 7
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Hi everyone,
I hope you are all having a great day! Question is as follows:
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.
(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,
(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,
(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,
(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,
(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,
Now, I did use the subject/verb agreement to eliminate all "have" statements i.e A and D. From there I eliminated A since "its focus" focus clearly showcases the focus of the discussion and eliminated E since "the extent that is" is unidiomatic. I went with the OA.
The explanation, however, states that "[...] the phrases whether... warmer and to what extent are parallel". How are these parallel? From my knowledge, parallel statements were ones with complementary ending suffixes, which in turn mean they are all happening at the same time (from a verb-tense point of view).
An explanation would be great! Thank you
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I hope you are all having a great day! Question is as follows:
Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might, but climatologists have indicated all along that precipitation, storminess, and temperature extremes are likely to have the greatest impact on people.
(A) Discussion of greenhouse effects have usually had as a focus the possibility of Earth growing warmer and to what extent it might,
(B) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually had as its focus whether Earth would get warmer and what the extent would be,
(C) Discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent,
(D) The discussion of greenhouse effects have usually focused on the possibility of Earth getting warmer and to what extent it might,
(E) The discussion of greenhouse effects has usually focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and the extent that is,
Now, I did use the subject/verb agreement to eliminate all "have" statements i.e A and D. From there I eliminated A since "its focus" focus clearly showcases the focus of the discussion and eliminated E since "the extent that is" is unidiomatic. I went with the OA.
The explanation, however, states that "[...] the phrases whether... warmer and to what extent are parallel". How are these parallel? From my knowledge, parallel statements were ones with complementary ending suffixes, which in turn mean they are all happening at the same time (from a verb-tense point of view).
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.