Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
18 Mar 2004, 06:51
Kudos
Bookmarks
passage 37
japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of
manufacturing efficiency in the world automobile
industry. some observers of japan have assumed that
japanese firms use the same manufacturing equipment
(5) and techniques as united states firms but have bene-
fited from the unique characteristics of japanese
employees and the japanese culture. however, if this
were true, then one would expect japanese auto plants
in the united states to perform no better than factories
(10) run by united states companies. this is not the case,
japanese-run automobile plants located in the united
states and staffed by local workers have demonstrated
higher levels of productivity when compared with facto-
ries owned by united states companies.
(15) other observers link high japanese productivity to
higher levels of capital investment per worker. but a
historical perspective leads to a different conclusion.
when the two top japanese automobile makers
matched and then doubled united states productivity
(20) levels in the mid-sixties, capital investment per
employee was comparable to that of united states
firms. furthermore, by the late seventies, the amount of
fixed assets required to produce one vehicle was
roughly equivalent in japan and in the united states.
(25) since capital investment was not higher in japan, it had
to be other factors that led to higher productivity.
a more fruitful explanation may lie with japanese
production techniques. japanese automobile producers
did not simply implement conventional processes more
(30) effectively: they made critical changes in united states
procedures. for instance, the mass-production philos-
ophy of united states automakers encouraged the
production of huge lots of cars in order to utilize fully
expensive, component-specific equipment and to
(35) occupy fully workers who have been trained to execute
one operation efficiently. japanese automakers chose to
make small-lot production feasible by introducing
several departures from united states practices,
including the use of flexible equipment that could be
(40) altered easily to do several different production tasks
and the training of workers in multiple jobs.
automakers could schedule the production of different
components or models on single machines, thereby
eliminating the need to store the buffer stocks of extra
(45) components that result when specialized equipment
and workers are kept constantly active.
1. the primary purpose of the passage is to
(a) present the major steps of a process
(b) clarify an ambiguity
(c) chronicle a dispute
(d) correct misconceptions
(e) defend an accepted approach
2. the author suggests that if the observers of japan mentioned in line 3 were correct, which of the following would be the case?
(a) the equipment used in japanese automobile plants would be different from the equipment used in united states plants.
(b) japanese workers would be trained to do several different production jobs.
(c) culture would not have an influence on the productivity levels of workers.
(d) the workers in japanese-run plants would have higher productivity levels regardless of where they were located.
(e) the production levels of japanese-run plants located in the united states would be equal to those of plants run by united states companies.
3. which of the following statements concerning the productivity levels of automakers can be inferred from the passage?
(a) prior to the 1960's, the productivity levels of the top japanese automakers were exceeded by those of united states automakers.
(b) the culture of a country has a large effect on the productivity levels of its automakers.
(c) during the late 1970's and early 1980's, productivity levels were comparable in japan and the united states.
(d) the greater the number of cars that are produced in a single lot, the higher a plant's productivity level.
(e) the amount of capital investment made by automobile manufacturers in their factories determines the level of productivity.
4. according to the passage, which of the following statements is true of japanese automobile workers?
(a) their productivity levels did not equal those of united states automobile workers until the late seventies.
(b) their high efficiency levels are a direct result of cultural influences.
(c) they operate component-specific machinery.
(d) they are trained to do more than one job.
(e) they produce larger lots of cars than do workers in united states factories.
5. which of the following best describes the organization of the first paragraph?
(a) a thesis is presented and supporting examples are provided.
(b) opposing views are presented, classified, and then reconciled.
(c) a fact is stated, and an explanation is advanced and then refuted.
(d) a theory is proposed, considered, and then amended.
(e) an opinion is presented, qualified, and then reaffirmed.
6. it can be inferred from the passage that one problem associated with the production of huge lots of cars is which of the following?
(a) the need to manufacture flexible machinery and equipment
(b) the need to store extra components not required for immediate use
(c) the need for expensive training programs for workers, which emphasize the development of facility in several production jobs.
(d) the need to alter conventional mass-production processes
(e) the need to increase the investment per vehicle in order to achieve high productivity levels
7. which of the following statements is supported by information stated in the passage?
(a) japanese and united states automakers differ in their approach to production processes.
(b) japanese automakers have perfected the use of single-function equipment.
(c) japanese automakers invest more capital per employee than do united states automakers.
(d) united states-owned factories abroad have higher production levels than do japanese owned plants in the united states.
(e) japanese automakers have benefited from the cultural heritage of their workers.
8. with which of the following predictive statement regarding japanese automakers would the author most likely agree?
(a) the efficiency levels of the japanese automakers will decline if they become less flexible in their approach to production
(b) japanese automakers productivity levels double during the late 1990's.
(c) united states automakes will originate net production processes before japanese automakers do.
(d) japanese automakers will hire fewer workers than will united states automakers because each worker is required to perform several jobs.
(e) japanese automakers will spend less on equipment repairs than will united states automakers because japanese equipment can be easily altered.
japanese firms have achieved the highest levels of
manufacturing efficiency in the world automobile
industry. some observers of japan have assumed that
japanese firms use the same manufacturing equipment
(5) and techniques as united states firms but have bene-
fited from the unique characteristics of japanese
employees and the japanese culture. however, if this
were true, then one would expect japanese auto plants
in the united states to perform no better than factories
(10) run by united states companies. this is not the case,
japanese-run automobile plants located in the united
states and staffed by local workers have demonstrated
higher levels of productivity when compared with facto-
ries owned by united states companies.
(15) other observers link high japanese productivity to
higher levels of capital investment per worker. but a
historical perspective leads to a different conclusion.
when the two top japanese automobile makers
matched and then doubled united states productivity
(20) levels in the mid-sixties, capital investment per
employee was comparable to that of united states
firms. furthermore, by the late seventies, the amount of
fixed assets required to produce one vehicle was
roughly equivalent in japan and in the united states.
(25) since capital investment was not higher in japan, it had
to be other factors that led to higher productivity.
a more fruitful explanation may lie with japanese
production techniques. japanese automobile producers
did not simply implement conventional processes more
(30) effectively: they made critical changes in united states
procedures. for instance, the mass-production philos-
ophy of united states automakers encouraged the
production of huge lots of cars in order to utilize fully
expensive, component-specific equipment and to
(35) occupy fully workers who have been trained to execute
one operation efficiently. japanese automakers chose to
make small-lot production feasible by introducing
several departures from united states practices,
including the use of flexible equipment that could be
(40) altered easily to do several different production tasks
and the training of workers in multiple jobs.
automakers could schedule the production of different
components or models on single machines, thereby
eliminating the need to store the buffer stocks of extra
(45) components that result when specialized equipment
and workers are kept constantly active.
1. the primary purpose of the passage is to
(a) present the major steps of a process
(b) clarify an ambiguity
(c) chronicle a dispute
(d) correct misconceptions
(e) defend an accepted approach
2. the author suggests that if the observers of japan mentioned in line 3 were correct, which of the following would be the case?
(a) the equipment used in japanese automobile plants would be different from the equipment used in united states plants.
(b) japanese workers would be trained to do several different production jobs.
(c) culture would not have an influence on the productivity levels of workers.
(d) the workers in japanese-run plants would have higher productivity levels regardless of where they were located.
(e) the production levels of japanese-run plants located in the united states would be equal to those of plants run by united states companies.
3. which of the following statements concerning the productivity levels of automakers can be inferred from the passage?
(a) prior to the 1960's, the productivity levels of the top japanese automakers were exceeded by those of united states automakers.
(b) the culture of a country has a large effect on the productivity levels of its automakers.
(c) during the late 1970's and early 1980's, productivity levels were comparable in japan and the united states.
(d) the greater the number of cars that are produced in a single lot, the higher a plant's productivity level.
(e) the amount of capital investment made by automobile manufacturers in their factories determines the level of productivity.
4. according to the passage, which of the following statements is true of japanese automobile workers?
(a) their productivity levels did not equal those of united states automobile workers until the late seventies.
(b) their high efficiency levels are a direct result of cultural influences.
(c) they operate component-specific machinery.
(d) they are trained to do more than one job.
(e) they produce larger lots of cars than do workers in united states factories.
5. which of the following best describes the organization of the first paragraph?
(a) a thesis is presented and supporting examples are provided.
(b) opposing views are presented, classified, and then reconciled.
(c) a fact is stated, and an explanation is advanced and then refuted.
(d) a theory is proposed, considered, and then amended.
(e) an opinion is presented, qualified, and then reaffirmed.
6. it can be inferred from the passage that one problem associated with the production of huge lots of cars is which of the following?
(a) the need to manufacture flexible machinery and equipment
(b) the need to store extra components not required for immediate use
(c) the need for expensive training programs for workers, which emphasize the development of facility in several production jobs.
(d) the need to alter conventional mass-production processes
(e) the need to increase the investment per vehicle in order to achieve high productivity levels
7. which of the following statements is supported by information stated in the passage?
(a) japanese and united states automakers differ in their approach to production processes.
(b) japanese automakers have perfected the use of single-function equipment.
(c) japanese automakers invest more capital per employee than do united states automakers.
(d) united states-owned factories abroad have higher production levels than do japanese owned plants in the united states.
(e) japanese automakers have benefited from the cultural heritage of their workers.
8. with which of the following predictive statement regarding japanese automakers would the author most likely agree?
(a) the efficiency levels of the japanese automakers will decline if they become less flexible in their approach to production
(b) japanese automakers productivity levels double during the late 1990's.
(c) united states automakes will originate net production processes before japanese automakers do.
(d) japanese automakers will hire fewer workers than will united states automakers because each worker is required to perform several jobs.
(e) japanese automakers will spend less on equipment repairs than will united states automakers because japanese equipment can be easily altered.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Reading Comprehension (RC) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
