Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 29 Mar 2017, 02:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Pedro: Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 154
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Pedro: Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 13:03
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:57) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Pedro: Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat to the environment. Sixteen billion disposable diapers are discarded annually, filling up landfills at an alarming rate. So people must stop buying disposable diapers and use cloth diapers.

Maria: But you forget that cloth diapers must be washed in hot water, which requires energy. Moreover, the resulting wastewater pollutes our rivers. When families use diaper services, diapers

must be delivered by fuel-burning trucks that pollute the air and add to traffic congestion.

Maria objects to Pedro's argument by

(A) claiming that Pedro overstates the negative evidence about disposable diapers in the course of his argument in favor of cloth diapers.

(B) indicating that Pedro draws a hasty conclusion, based on inadequate evidence about cloth diapers.

(C) pointing out that there is an ambiguous use of the word "disposable" in Pedro's argument

(D) demonstrating that cloth diapers are a far more serious threat to the environment than disposable diapers are

(E) suggesting that the economic advantages of cloth diapers outweigh whatever environmental damage they may cause
_________________

A 750 aspirant.

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 13:18
D
aspire, is there missing in the empty space ?
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 14:08
Would go for D.

He cites examples to show that it has many disadvantages too and it also causes environmental damges.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 18:04
This is tough. Contenders are B and D.

Choosing D would need an implicit assumption. I will go with B because of the word "but you forget" meaning something related to haste.
I am sure GMAT will not hav such a question as B also can be refuted.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 451 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 19:28
This is a subtle question.
I would go with D because B says that Pedro provides inadequate evidence about cloth diapers. However, Pedro does not give any evidence as to cloth diapers. He only mentions the cons of disposable diapers. Therefore, B can be refuted in that sense
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 154
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 20:07
Guys, this is going to disappoint most of you and is sure to generate lots of debate.

Even I selected D. But seems now Anandnk has to explain us where we went wrong.
_________________

A 750 aspirant.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 451 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 20:43
D can also be negated because Maria does not really mention how cloth diapers are far more serious a threat than disposable diapers are. She just mentions that cloth diapers represent a threat to the environment but never establishes the magnitude of one's danger over another. Yet, as I previously mentioned, Pedro never mentioned any evidence about cloth diapers. Both B and D can each be refuted and this means that actually none of the answer should really be good.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 21:21
No way I can explain it. I just wanted to be different ( I can do that on the forum ) but believe me I would have chosen D in the test. I think Paul did a good job explaining it.

What is the source of this question ?
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 154
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 21:31
Actually this is an LSAT question. I got this question on the web when I searched for LSAT questions.
_________________

A 750 aspirant.

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3460
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 871 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 21:51
aspire wrote:
Actually this is an LSAT question. I got this question on the web when I searched for LSAT questions.

Its great that you are working on LSAT's. LSAT's are great practice. the idea is to develop the logic of analyzing arguments and to understand what the questions is really about.

I recommend LSAT's as they complement the CR and RC's of the OG. Practice will improve these skills.

regards
praetorian
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 451 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2004, 21:56
praetorian123 wrote:
aspire wrote:
Actually this is an LSAT question. I got this question on the web when I searched for LSAT questions.

Its great that you are working on LSAT's. LSAT's are great practice. the idea is to develop the logic of analyzing arguments and to understand what the questions is really about.

I recommend LSAT's as they complement the CR and RC's of the OG. Practice will improve these skills.

regards
praetorian

After doing LSAT CR, you sure will find GMAT CR so much easier. I'm also quoting Vicky on this
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 08:43
I understand OA is B. But still I am not getting convinced between B and D.

Reasons :
1. D is wrong because as Paul said, there doesnt seem to be any indication of comparison . Maira is just stating facts.

2. B is wrong because when Pedro says 'Unlike clothe diapers', he seems to know about clothe diapers and 'inadequate evidence' is surely not appropriate.

If someone can find a much convincing explanation, please put forward.

Thanks
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1808
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 09:02
Well my final answer is B. In drawing conclusion Pedro uses insufficient evidence and hence B should be correct. There is nothing mentioed about the threat or comparitive threat. Both the answers mention negatives about the both types of uses but we cannot realize that one diaper is a threat and the other is not.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 273
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 13:07
Pedro draws a hasty conclusion insofar as he concludes they are not a threat to the environment, without considering all the evidence (which is conveniently supplied by Mary). Hence his evidence (of which none was supplied) was insufficient.
10 Aug 2004, 13:07
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Analyst: Creative professionals, such as clothing designers, 0 07 Nov 2009, 11:30
14 CR Cloth Diapers 22 21 Mar 2008, 14:07
Most disposable plastic containers are now labeled with a 9 24 Sep 2007, 13:51
Analyst: Creative professionals, such as clothing designers, 0 29 Jun 2007, 13:14
Pedro: Unlike cloth diapers, disposable diapers are a threat 9 12 Apr 2007, 07:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by