GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Nov 2019, 18:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095
People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2019, 22:14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

90% (01:10) correct 10% (01:31) wrong based on 79 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Competition Mode Question



People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious dogs are morally and legally responsible for their pets actions. If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.

All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners.
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored.
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors.
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly.

_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 01 Mar 2019
Posts: 273
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '22, ISB '20, NUS '20
GPA: 4
Reviews Badge
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2019, 22:42
1
A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners......SUPPORTS
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.....SUPPORTS
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored.....SUPPORTS
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors......NO mention regarding conrol of pet behaviours
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly. .....supports

OA: D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 315
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2019, 22:42
1
Has to be D.

D weakens the argument by saying that the pets actions can not be controlled completely by their owners.

If so, they shouldn't be held responsible for actions that aren't in their hands

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 18 May 2019
Posts: 453
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Sep 2019, 23:14
1
Option D is the answer in my view. If a pet owner cannot completely control their pet's behavior, then it is unfair to say that they should be held 100% accountable for the harm the pets inflict on people. Let's consider for instance a pet owner keeps his snake pet within a space where humans are not exposed to it. Then someone out of the blue breaks into such confines or provokes the snake and got bitten in the process, it would be unfair to hold the snake owner accountable for such a scenario. The only justification out of the options given to support the pet owner in such a circumstance is that a pet owner cannot completely control their pet's behavior.

All the other options would strengthen the argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Posts: 226
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Healthcare
CAT Tests
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 00:08
1
Imo D.

People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious dogs are morally and legally responsible for their pets actions. If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.

All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners. - Place of pets are under control of their owners. So, its owner's responsibility if pet hurts someone. Strengthen.

B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property. - Pets are property of a person (which is under control of a person) and person (in general) is responsible if his property hurts someone. Strengthen.

C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored. - It's responsibility of parents to control their children's whereabouts. Strengthen.

D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors. -this option mentions that pet owner can't control pets completely. So, they are not fully blameworthy at all. Seems mild weakener, hence correct.

E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly.- dangerous pet is like a dangerous weapon and it must be cared accordingly. Strengthen.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5183
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 00:14
1
Top Contributor
People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious dogs are morally and legally responsible for their pets actions. If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.

All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners. - Strengthener.
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.-- strengthener
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored. -- strengthener
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors. -- does not strength
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly. -- strengthener

Ans: D
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 382
Location: India
GMAT 1: 580 Q43 V27
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
CAT Tests
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 02:37
1
Owners of dangerous pets such as snakes and ferocious dogs are responsible for their pets’ actions. Anything that even after all the preparations by owners is not under their control would either weaken or be neutral to above argument.

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners. WRONG. Since any actions of pets would be under the supervision of their owners, owners would be held responsible for letting those actions happen.
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property. – WRONG. Again a strengthener.
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored. – WRONG. Analogy drawn here would strengthen the argument.
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors. – CORRECT. If owners can’t control things they would not take any responsibility.
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly. – WRONG. Any weapon used either by owners or someone else makes owner accountable hence the option strengthens the argument.

IMO Answer (D).
_________________
Ephemeral Epiphany..!

GMATPREP1 590(Q48,V23) March 6, 2019
GMATPREP2 610(Q44,V29) June 10, 2019
GMATPREPSoft1 680(Q48,V35) June 26, 2019
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 778
Location: United States
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 05:34
1
Quote:
People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious dogs are morally and legally responsible for their pets actions. If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.

All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners.
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored.
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors.
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly.


ARGUMENT
[con] people who own dangerous pets are morally and legally responsible for their actions, and must be held 100% accountable.

A. this strengthens the premise that owners are accountable for their pets actions, out;
B. "pet is a property, and people are resp. for their prop" strengthens, out;
C. "must constantly be controlled and trained" strengthens, out;
E. "it must be cared for accordingly."

Answer (D): if owners cannot control their pets, how could they be responsible for their actions? this definitely doesn't strengthen.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 31
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 06:23
1
The question indicates that : Dangerous Dogs are the physical property of their owners and any act done by them is the responsibility of the owners
Question: EXCEPT It's vital to understand that more often than not, we end up not reading this word and end up screwing up because we're in a jiffy .
All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners.-Indicates a reason why owners should be responsible.


B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.-Here a relationship has been drawn between a person's dog and property.



C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored.-Indicates moral grounds on which the owner can be held responsible

D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors.-this is a probable answer choice, let's keep this option.

E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly.- Again, a relationship has been drawn between a weapon and a dog indicating that dangerous properties of a person, is that persons responsibility.


ANSWER:D
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
V
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5277
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 08:35
Conclusion ;
If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.
only option which weakens the arguement is pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors.
IMO D;

People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious dogs are morally and legally responsible for their pets actions. If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.

All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners.
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored.
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors.
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 20:56
Bunuel wrote:

Competition Mode Question



People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious dogs are morally and legally responsible for their pets actions. If someone is hurt by such a pet, the owner should be held 100% accountable.

All of the following statements, if true, would strengthen this argument EXCEPT

A. the physical whereabouts of pets are completely under the control of their owners.
B. a pet is the legal property of a person, and people are responsible for damages inflicted by their property.
C. a pet is like a young child in that its whereabouts must constantly be controlled and behaviors trained and monitored.
D. pet owners cannot completely control their pets’ behaviors.
E. a dangerous pet is no different from a dangerous weapon, and it must be cared for accordingly.


Official Explanation



Correct Answer: D

If pet owners cannot completely control their pets behaviors, then this undermines the conclusion that pet owners should be 100% accountable for their pets actions. The other choices, however, all make claims that support the argument for accountability.
_________________
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 42
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V38
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2019, 21:34
Selected D. the owners are responsible for their pets in every way irrespective of the moods or behaviour of their pets.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do   [#permalink] 01 Oct 2019, 21:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

People who own dangerous pets such as poisonous snakes or ferocious do

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne