Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 04:00 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 04:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gmatbull
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Last visit: 04 Feb 2018
Posts: 336
Own Kudos:
2,533
 [29]
Given Kudos: 20
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Posts: 336
Kudos: 2,533
 [29]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mohnish104
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Last visit: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
901
 [11]
Given Kudos: 291
Posts: 144
Kudos: 901
 [11]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ramannanda9
Joined: 15 May 2013
Last visit: 22 Apr 2015
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
245
 [7]
Given Kudos: 34
Status:Persevering
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Posts: 110
Kudos: 245
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Marcab
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 856
Own Kudos:
4,666
 [2]
Given Kudos: 221
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 856
Kudos: 4,666
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A defender assumption question, though not much preferred by GMAT.

Bull,
Consider their metabolic rate 25kCal/hour. Now if the experts start consuming the calories at a rate higher than their metabloic rate, what will happen. These calories will start accumulating and hence will result in weight gain.
Negating D, yields you the same explanation.
The choice has mentioned the people who consider higher weight normal in order to emphasize that if these people will consider higher weight normal, then they will continue to consume more calories because they would be thinking that it is still not in excess. Now if the aerobic experts consume calories at a rate higher than the rate of the people who consider higher weight normal, then naturally aerobic experts too will gain weight.

+1D
avatar
dransa
Joined: 29 May 2013
Last visit: 06 Sep 2015
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 47
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ramannanda9
Hi,

Facts: 1) Aerobic experts have higher metabolic rates than normal people.
So to gain weight they need to consume more calories than the people for whom this weight is normal

Conclusion : "aerobics experts will ultimately lose the newly gained weight until their weight matches their high metabolic rate"

For the conclusion to hold true our assumption must support it.

(A) Physical trainers disagree over whether metabolic rates can be increased or decreased through the use of
targeted hormone treatments. What ? Out of Scope
(B) The metabolisms of people who are not aerobics experts are more variable than the metabolisms of people who
have been aerobic experts. Can we even say that, also how does this help me reach the conclusion
(C) People who are at their usual weights find it equally difficult to gain or to lose weight due to the constant speed
of their metabolisms. Not relevant, Not related to the conclusion, We don't know anything about whether they are equally difficult or is one thing more difficult than the other.
(D) Not many aerobics experts who have gained weight by increasing caloric intake continue to consume substantially
more calories than do people for whom the higher weight is normal.Correct, This option says that aerobic experts do eventually consume less or same amount of calories than people with higher weight, otherwise they won't be able to reduce their weight.
(E) The number of calories that an individual burns in a day is determined by the amount consumed that day and
not by the individual's current weight.Out of scope, irrelevant

Hope this helps.
I agree with you the explanation for D. But I disagree for E. E is relevant but incorrect option. It is and anti-assumption. If option E were true then the conclusion falls apart. That is why option E is wrong.
User avatar
ronr34
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2014
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 254
Kudos: 246
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm having a problem with D.
D says that "most aerobics experts..."
How do we determine if the question itself is only talking about some and not all of the aerobics experts?
User avatar
deya
Joined: 12 Sep 2012
Last visit: 08 Aug 2015
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
GMAT 1: 550 Q49 V17
GMAT 1: 550 Q49 V17
Posts: 23
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have also the same problem in determining whether the argument is talking about all aerobic experts or some aerobic experts. This is also to be considered that all other options are out of scope or irrelevant except "E". Option E seemed tempting to me. Kindly shed some light on this question.
avatar
rajarshee
Joined: 19 Jul 2013
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
107
 [2]
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 31
Kudos: 107
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatbull
What is the logic of the argument below?

Physical trainers have found that when aerobics experts, who tend to have relatively high metabolic rates, gain
weight by increasing the number of calories they consume, their metabolisms continue to be higher than average.
They will thus burn more calories at their new weight than do people for whom the new weight is normal. As a result,
aerobics experts will ultimately lose the newly gained weight until their weight matches their high metabolic rate.

The conclusion of the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Physical trainers disagree over whether metabolic rates can be increased or decreased through the use of
targeted hormone treatments.
(B) The metabolisms of people who are not aerobics experts are more variable than the metabolisms of people who
have been aerobic experts.
(C) People who are at their usual weights find it equally difficult to gain or to lose weight due to the constant speed
of their metabolisms.
(D) Not many aerobics experts who have gained weight by increasing caloric intake continue to consume substantially
more calories than do people for whom the higher weight is normal.
(E) The number of calories that an individual burns in a day is determined by the amount consumed that day and
not by the individual's current weight.

Arrived at D by elimination but then D is not a very easy choice to understand. All the question stem says is that aerobics experts have higher than average metabolic rate at any given weight. So if they have to maintain a higher weight consistently, they have to keep consuming more calories than normal folks. The question stem however says that it doesn't happen and aerobic experts fall back somewhere close to their original weights after a while. Which means that they don't keep consuming more calories consistently. Which is the same as D.
User avatar
Firdaus
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Last visit: 26 Sep 2022
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91
Status:Self Redemption
Affiliations: Open
Umar: Firdaus
GPA: 3.45
Products:
Posts: 9
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Physical trainers have found that when aerobics experts, who tend to have relatively high metabolic rates
=> Argument talks about those aerobic experts that have high MR not all aerobic experts.

When they gain weight, their MR tends to be higher than average. Hence if they gain weight their MR doesnt drop , their metabolism will be higher. Thus they will burn more calories and restore their weight to levels that matches their MR.

Now the conclusion is :> As a result, aerobics experts will ultimately lose the newly gained weight until their weight matches their high metabolic rate.
Conclusion will fall apart if they continues to put more gain by consuming more calories, which is only possible if their MR is below average or at average levels.

(D) Not many aerobics experts who have gained weight by increasing caloric intake continue to consume substantially
more calories than do people for whom the higher weight is normal.

Choice D defends the argument by rejecting the statement that not many aerobic experts who gained weight continue to consume more calories than do normal people.

I believe that another assumption could be true as well : aerobic experts who have high MR, their MR doesnt drop by gaining more weight.
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,070
Kudos: 2,058
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Physical trainers have found that when aerobics experts, who tend to have relatively high metabolic rates, gain
weight by increasing the number of calories they consume, their metabolisms continue to be higher than average.
They will thus burn more calories at their new weight than do people for whom the new weight is normal. As a result,
aerobics experts will ultimately lose the newly gained weight until their weight matches their high metabolic rate.

The conclusion of the argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Physical trainers disagree over whether metabolic rates can be increased or decreased through the use of
targeted hormone treatments. -Out of scope
(B) The metabolisms of people who are not aerobics experts are more variable than the metabolisms of people who
have been aerobic experts. -So what? This is just a fact set.
(C) People who are at their usual weights find it equally difficult to gain or to lose weight due to the constant speed
of their metabolisms. -Doesn't bother us. We need to talk about the aerobics experts.
(D) Not many aerobics experts who have gained weight by increasing caloric intake continue to consume substantially
more calories than do people for whom the higher weight is normal. -Correct. If they consume at a higher rate than the heavier people then thy wouldn't loose weight.
(E) The number of calories that an individual burns in a day is determined by the amount consumed that day and
not by the individual's current weight. -Out of scope.
User avatar
Mavisdu1017
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Last visit: 04 Jan 2023
Posts: 368
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 226
Posts: 368
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello expert,
Could you help on why D is correct and E is wrong? Thanks. Below is my reasoning:
Negate D:many aerobics experts who have gained weight by increasing caloric intake continue to consume substantially more calories than do people for whom the higher weight is normal.
As the premise says: the more calories they eat, the more calories they burn. So even if they continue to eat more calories, they can lose weight too. Thus negating D cannot weaken the conclusion.

While Negate E: calories burning is determined by current weight but not by the amount of calories one eats.
If so, Physical trainers will burn the same calories with people who are in the same weight. That means Physical trainers cannot burn more calories at their new weight than do people for whom the new weight is normal. So Physical trainers cannot lose weight to their original weight (weaken the conclusion).
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 17,991
Own Kudos:
Posts: 17,991
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts